Exploring the Synergy of Cognitive Dissonance and Computational Chemistry─A Task Design for Supporting Learning in Organic Chemistry

IF 3 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01483
Leonie S. Lieber*, Nicole Graulich, Giulia Licini and Laura Orian*, 
{"title":"Exploring the Synergy of Cognitive Dissonance and Computational Chemistry─A Task Design for Supporting Learning in Organic Chemistry","authors":"Leonie S. Lieber*,&nbsp;Nicole Graulich,&nbsp;Giulia Licini and Laura Orian*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Organic and computational chemistry are increasingly interconnected, with computational methods now being essential for understanding complex reaction mechanisms. Thus, integrating computational chemistry into organic chemistry is crucial for supporting students in arguing with evidence and gaining a deeper understanding of chemical concepts that traditional experimental approaches have struggled to elucidate. This integration of computational methods is now essential in modern organic chemistry and should be introduced to the classrooms of students. An authentic learning experience that uses data from computational chemistry calculations and allows students to make a claim about structure–property relationships can bridge the gap between theoretical and experimental approaches, fostering students’ understanding of chemical concepts and enhancing their problem-solving skills. This study investigates how integrating organic chemical problems into a computational chemistry course can be achieved by a task design that aims to induce cognitive dissonance. In this task design, eight students first build written arguments for the most stable conformation of simple disubstituted ethanes, i.e., 1,2-difluoroethane and 1,2-dichloroethane, followed by computational calculations to verify or revise their arguments. The study examined how cognitive dissonance affects students’ perceived confidence, their written argumentation, and their overall task evaluation. The results indicated that the task design successfully induced cognitive dissonance, leading to a drop in confidence after computational results contradicted students’ arguments. The evaluation revealed that students rated the task design to be cognitively demanding but also to be engaging and beneficial for understanding chemical concepts. The study’s implications emphasize the potential for integrating computational data into organic chemistry as a means to critically evaluate one’s arguments and gain a deeper understanding of chemical phenomena.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 3","pages":"1129–1137 1129–1137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01483","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic and computational chemistry are increasingly interconnected, with computational methods now being essential for understanding complex reaction mechanisms. Thus, integrating computational chemistry into organic chemistry is crucial for supporting students in arguing with evidence and gaining a deeper understanding of chemical concepts that traditional experimental approaches have struggled to elucidate. This integration of computational methods is now essential in modern organic chemistry and should be introduced to the classrooms of students. An authentic learning experience that uses data from computational chemistry calculations and allows students to make a claim about structure–property relationships can bridge the gap between theoretical and experimental approaches, fostering students’ understanding of chemical concepts and enhancing their problem-solving skills. This study investigates how integrating organic chemical problems into a computational chemistry course can be achieved by a task design that aims to induce cognitive dissonance. In this task design, eight students first build written arguments for the most stable conformation of simple disubstituted ethanes, i.e., 1,2-difluoroethane and 1,2-dichloroethane, followed by computational calculations to verify or revise their arguments. The study examined how cognitive dissonance affects students’ perceived confidence, their written argumentation, and their overall task evaluation. The results indicated that the task design successfully induced cognitive dissonance, leading to a drop in confidence after computational results contradicted students’ arguments. The evaluation revealed that students rated the task design to be cognitively demanding but also to be engaging and beneficial for understanding chemical concepts. The study’s implications emphasize the potential for integrating computational data into organic chemistry as a means to critically evaluate one’s arguments and gain a deeper understanding of chemical phenomena.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索认知失调与计算化学的协同作用──支持有机化学学习的任务设计
有机化学和计算化学日益相互联系,计算方法现在是理解复杂反应机制的必要条件。因此,将计算化学整合到有机化学中,对于支持学生用证据辩论和对传统实验方法难以阐明的化学概念有更深的理解是至关重要的。这种计算方法的整合在现代有机化学中是必不可少的,应该引入学生的课堂。使用计算化学计算数据的真实学习体验,允许学生对结构-性质关系做出声明,可以弥合理论和实验方法之间的差距,培养学生对化学概念的理解,提高他们解决问题的能力。本研究探讨了如何通过旨在诱导认知失调的任务设计将有机化学问题整合到计算化学课程中。在本次任务设计中,8名学生首先为简单二取代乙烷(即1,2-二氟乙烷和1,2-二氯乙烷)最稳定的构象建立书面论证,然后通过计算计算来验证或修改他们的论证。该研究考察了认知失调如何影响学生的感知自信、他们的书面论证和他们的整体任务评估。结果表明,任务设计成功地诱导了认知失调,导致计算结果与学生的论点相矛盾后信心下降。评估显示,学生们认为任务设计对认知要求很高,但也很有吸引力,有利于理解化学概念。这项研究的意义强调了将计算数据整合到有机化学中的潜力,作为一种批判性评估论点和对化学现象有更深理解的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Using Chalk Sticks to Illustrate How Surface Area Affects Reaction Rate Kakemongen Mapu Mew (The Other Forms of Life): Translation of the Periodic Table of Elements into Mapudungun Beyond the Ideal Gas Behavior: Using a Sampling Valve to Determine the Fugacity of CO2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1