Life cycle cost optimization for schools energy retrofit under climate change: Methodological approach and analyses in five different climates

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Energy and Buildings Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115561
Ludovica Maria Campagna, Francesco Carlucci, Francesco Fiorito
{"title":"Life cycle cost optimization for schools energy retrofit under climate change: Methodological approach and analyses in five different climates","authors":"Ludovica Maria Campagna,&nbsp;Francesco Carlucci,&nbsp;Francesco Fiorito","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The energy renovation of existing schools has become a priority, to address which cost-effective retrofit strategies should be identified, considering the unavoidable climatic changes, to maximize the benefits during the whole service life. This paper presents a methodology useful for comparing different retrofit proposals by adopting a cost-optimal approach, in which the effects of future climate variations on energy needs were also considered. The methodology was applied to school buildings located in Italy, considering 5 different cities, with the aim of assessing whether an over-performing building − exceeding the minimum regulatory requirements − could provide economic benefits, considering future climatic evolutions and consequent energy needs variations. Different retrofit measures (active and passive) were identified, each of which was associated with different performance targets, starting with those required by the current national energy standard. Accordingly, 900 retrofit proposals were compared against a baseline retrofit option, that brings the building into compliance with current regulations. Optimal solutions were found through a single-objective optimization, performed combining Python and EnergyPlus, which aimed to minimise the global cost of the intervention over a 30-year time horizon. The evolution of climate conditions was also considered in this time interval, generating future weather files on the basis of the most recent SSP5-8.5 scenario. Results highlighted the importance of careful selection of retrofit measures, showing that exceeding regulatory standards does not automatically lead to economic benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"335 ","pages":"Article 115561"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825002919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The energy renovation of existing schools has become a priority, to address which cost-effective retrofit strategies should be identified, considering the unavoidable climatic changes, to maximize the benefits during the whole service life. This paper presents a methodology useful for comparing different retrofit proposals by adopting a cost-optimal approach, in which the effects of future climate variations on energy needs were also considered. The methodology was applied to school buildings located in Italy, considering 5 different cities, with the aim of assessing whether an over-performing building − exceeding the minimum regulatory requirements − could provide economic benefits, considering future climatic evolutions and consequent energy needs variations. Different retrofit measures (active and passive) were identified, each of which was associated with different performance targets, starting with those required by the current national energy standard. Accordingly, 900 retrofit proposals were compared against a baseline retrofit option, that brings the building into compliance with current regulations. Optimal solutions were found through a single-objective optimization, performed combining Python and EnergyPlus, which aimed to minimise the global cost of the intervention over a 30-year time horizon. The evolution of climate conditions was also considered in this time interval, generating future weather files on the basis of the most recent SSP5-8.5 scenario. Results highlighted the importance of careful selection of retrofit measures, showing that exceeding regulatory standards does not automatically lead to economic benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候变化下学校能源改造的生命周期成本优化:五种不同气候条件下的方法和分析
考虑到不可避免的气候变化,现有学校的能源改造已经成为一个优先事项,为了解决这些问题,应该确定具有成本效益的改造策略,以最大限度地提高整个使用寿命的效益。本文提出了一种方法,通过采用成本最优的方法来比较不同的改造建议,其中还考虑了未来气候变化对能源需求的影响。该方法被应用于意大利的学校建筑,考虑了5个不同的城市,目的是评估一个表现过度的建筑-超过最低监管要求-是否可以提供经济效益,考虑到未来的气候演变和随之而来的能源需求变化。确定了不同的改造措施(主动和被动),每一种都与不同的性能目标相关联,从当前国家能源标准要求的目标开始。因此,900个改造方案与基线改造方案进行了比较,使建筑符合现行法规。通过结合Python和EnergyPlus进行单目标优化,找到了最佳解决方案,旨在在30年的时间范围内将全球干预成本降至最低。气候条件的演变也被考虑在这个时间间隔内,在最近的SSP5-8.5情景的基础上生成未来的天气文件。结果强调了谨慎选择改造措施的重要性,表明超过监管标准并不会自动带来经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Computational analysis of passive radiative cooling for building thermal comfort in hot climates Comparative thermo-environ-economic analysis of solar-assisted and conventional ejector-compression heat pump systems for space heating Human-centered energy modeling: integrating occupant behavior in simulation workflows Synergistic control of cold source and comfort thresholds in active phase change envelope systems: A multi-strategy comparative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1