Biases and nudges in the circular economy: A review

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108579
Luca Congiu , Enrico Botta , Mariangela Zoli
{"title":"Biases and nudges in the circular economy: A review","authors":"Luca Congiu ,&nbsp;Enrico Botta ,&nbsp;Mariangela Zoli","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The circular economy transition requires consumers to make efforts in their waste disposal behaviors by increasing waste sorting, repairing and reusing products, and reducing the amount of waste produced. The literature has identified several barriers to consumers’ adoption of these practices. In this article, we posit that such barriers can be ultimately linked to well-known decisional biases and proceed to offer a review. In doing so, we categorize biases into “cognitive”, referring to deviations from judgment and behavior that would be “correct” according to the rules of logic and mathematics, and “motivational”, encompassing judgment and behavior driven by desirability concerns. We also survey the existing behavioral policies addressing the identified biases, focusing on “nudges”, that is, interventions leveraging biases to improve welfare. In our review, we call attention to the importance of recognizing the relevant bias behind specific behaviors to identify the best interventions to implement. By offering a conceptual link between biases and circular economy practices, we also lay the groundwork for future experimental investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108579"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180092500062X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The circular economy transition requires consumers to make efforts in their waste disposal behaviors by increasing waste sorting, repairing and reusing products, and reducing the amount of waste produced. The literature has identified several barriers to consumers’ adoption of these practices. In this article, we posit that such barriers can be ultimately linked to well-known decisional biases and proceed to offer a review. In doing so, we categorize biases into “cognitive”, referring to deviations from judgment and behavior that would be “correct” according to the rules of logic and mathematics, and “motivational”, encompassing judgment and behavior driven by desirability concerns. We also survey the existing behavioral policies addressing the identified biases, focusing on “nudges”, that is, interventions leveraging biases to improve welfare. In our review, we call attention to the importance of recognizing the relevant bias behind specific behaviors to identify the best interventions to implement. By offering a conceptual link between biases and circular economy practices, we also lay the groundwork for future experimental investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环经济转型要求消费者在废物处理行为方面做出努力,增加废物分类、维修和重复使用产品,并减少产生的废物量。文献指出了消费者采用这些做法的若干障碍。在本文中,我们认为这些障碍最终都与众所周知的决策偏差有关,并对其进行了综述。在此过程中,我们将偏差分为 "认知偏差 "和 "动机偏差"。"认知偏差 "是指偏离根据逻辑和数学规则 "正确 "的判断和行为,而 "动机偏差 "则包括受欲望驱动的判断和行为。我们还调查了针对已识别偏差的现有行为政策,重点关注 "点拨",即利用偏差改善福利的干预措施。在我们的综述中,我们呼吁大家注意认识到特定行为背后的相关偏差对于确定最佳干预措施的重要性。通过提供偏见与循环经济实践之间的概念联系,我们还为未来的实验研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Public support for climate policies and its ideological predictors across countries of the Global North and Global South Salience and information avoidance in voluntary carbon offsetting decisions: Evidence from online experiments Carbon taxes in Europe do not hurt the poor: Evidence from existing taxation schemes Snowmaking's slippery slope: The effect of mountain reservoirs on water demand Over-capitalization in fisheries with irreversible investment and factor substitution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1