Interfractional body surface monitoring using daily cone-beam computed tomography imaging for pediatric adaptive proton therapy

Ozgur Ates, Hoyeon Lee, Jinsoo Uh, Matthew J. Krasin, Thomas E. Merchant, Chia-ho Hua
{"title":"Interfractional body surface monitoring using daily cone-beam computed tomography imaging for pediatric adaptive proton therapy","authors":"Ozgur Ates,&nbsp;Hoyeon Lee,&nbsp;Jinsoo Uh,&nbsp;Matthew J. Krasin,&nbsp;Thomas E. Merchant,&nbsp;Chia-ho Hua","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>A novel method was developed to detect body surface changes on daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and estimate the impact on proton plan quality for pediatric patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Simulation CT, daily CBCT, and repeat CT images were collected for 21 pediatric non-central nervous system (CNS) patients. Changes in the body surface in the proton beam path (ΔSurface<sub>CBCT</sub>) were calculated for each spot by comparing simulation CT with daily CBCT. Subsequently, changes in water equivalent path length (WEPL) (ΔWEPL<sub>Synthetic CT</sub>) were calculated for each spot by comparing the simulation CT with the synthetic CT converted from daily CBCT. The ground truth surface (ΔSurface<sub>Repeat CT</sub>) and WEPL changes (ΔWEPL<sub>Repeat CT</sub>) were calculated by comparing the simulation CT with the repeat CT taken on the same day as the CBCT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The root-mean-square (RMS) error between the ΔSurface<sub>CBCT</sub> and ΔSurface<sub>Repeat CT</sub> was 1.3 mm, while the RMS error between ΔWEPL<sub>Synthetic CT</sub> and ΔWEPL<sub>Repeat CT</sub> was 1.6 mm. A strong linear correlation was determined between ΔSurface<sub>CBCT</sub> and ΔWEPL<sub>Synthetic CT</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.97). The non-linear regression analysis of the dose volume parameters indicated that a 5 % decrease in clinical target volume (CTV) D<sub>min</sub> and D<sub>99%</sub> was caused by 3.9 mm and 6.3 mm of ΔSurface<sub>CBCT</sub>, and 4.0 mm and 6.6 mm of ΔWEPL<sub>Synthetic CT</sub>, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings revealed that a 5 mm change in body surface can lead to a significant degradation of plan quality, reducing CTV D<sub>min</sub> by 11.7 % and underscoring the need for adapting treatment plan.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100746"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162500051X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

A novel method was developed to detect body surface changes on daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and estimate the impact on proton plan quality for pediatric patients.

Materials and methods

Simulation CT, daily CBCT, and repeat CT images were collected for 21 pediatric non-central nervous system (CNS) patients. Changes in the body surface in the proton beam path (ΔSurfaceCBCT) were calculated for each spot by comparing simulation CT with daily CBCT. Subsequently, changes in water equivalent path length (WEPL) (ΔWEPLSynthetic CT) were calculated for each spot by comparing the simulation CT with the synthetic CT converted from daily CBCT. The ground truth surface (ΔSurfaceRepeat CT) and WEPL changes (ΔWEPLRepeat CT) were calculated by comparing the simulation CT with the repeat CT taken on the same day as the CBCT.

Results

The root-mean-square (RMS) error between the ΔSurfaceCBCT and ΔSurfaceRepeat CT was 1.3 mm, while the RMS error between ΔWEPLSynthetic CT and ΔWEPLRepeat CT was 1.6 mm. A strong linear correlation was determined between ΔSurfaceCBCT and ΔWEPLSynthetic CT (R2 = 0.97). The non-linear regression analysis of the dose volume parameters indicated that a 5 % decrease in clinical target volume (CTV) Dmin and D99% was caused by 3.9 mm and 6.3 mm of ΔSurfaceCBCT, and 4.0 mm and 6.6 mm of ΔWEPLSynthetic CT, respectively.

Conclusions

The findings revealed that a 5 mm change in body surface can lead to a significant degradation of plan quality, reducing CTV Dmin by 11.7 % and underscoring the need for adapting treatment plan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景和目的开发了一种新方法来检测每日锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)上的体表变化,并估计其对儿科患者质子计划质量的影响。材料和方法收集了 21 名儿科非中枢神经系统(CNS)患者的模拟 CT、每日 CBCT 和重复 CT 图像。通过比较模拟 CT 和日常 CBCT,计算出每个点的质子束路径中体表的变化(ΔSurfaceCBCT)。随后,通过比较模拟 CT 和从每日 CBCT 转换而来的合成 CT,计算出每个点的水等效路径长度 (WEPL) 变化(ΔWEPLSynthetic CT)。通过比较模拟 CT 和 CBCT 同一天拍摄的重复 CT,计算出地面真实表面(ΔSurfaceRepeat CT)和 WEPL 变化(ΔWEPLRepeat CT)。结果 ΔSurfaceCBCT 与 ΔSurfaceRepeat CT 之间的均方根误差为 1.3 毫米,而 ΔWEPLSynthetic CT 与 ΔWEPLRepeat CT 之间的均方根误差为 1.6 毫米。ΔSurfaceCBCT 和 ΔWEPLS 合成 CT 之间具有很强的线性相关性(R2 = 0.97)。剂量体积参数的非线性回归分析表明,ΔSurfaceCBCT 和 ΔWEPLSynthetic CT 分别增加 3.9 毫米和 6.3 毫米,ΔWEPLSynthetic CT 分别增加 4.0 毫米和 6.6 毫米,临床目标体积 (CTV) Dmin 和 D99% 就会减少 5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physics-based data augmentation for improved training of cone-beam computed tomography auto-segmentation of the female pelvis A novel moving phantom insert for image quality assessment in magnetic resonance imaging Interfractional body surface monitoring using daily cone-beam computed tomography imaging for pediatric adaptive proton therapy A dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy treatment delivery with real-time adaption and no motion correction Deep learning-based prediction of Monte Carlo dose distribution for heavy ion therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1