Driving risks assessment and in-vehicle warning design for improving work zone safety

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2025.107991
Junyu Hang , Xiaomeng Li , Xuedong Yan , Ke Duan , Qingchun Wang , Qingwan Xue
{"title":"Driving risks assessment and in-vehicle warning design for improving work zone safety","authors":"Junyu Hang ,&nbsp;Xiaomeng Li ,&nbsp;Xuedong Yan ,&nbsp;Ke Duan ,&nbsp;Qingchun Wang ,&nbsp;Qingwan Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.107991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Work zones present unique risks to both workers and road users due to its complex and dynamic nature. This study developed a two-stage in-vehicle warning system aimed at refining driver behavior when approaching work zones and mitigating lane-changing risks. To accurately capture the thorough behavioral processes of drivers near work zones, a driving simulation experiment was conducted involving 38 participants of diverse genders and occupations. Different warning modes (baseline vs. two-stage warning), speed limits (60 km/h vs. 80 km/h), and visibility conditions (clear vs. fog) were incorporated into the experimental design. The entire behavioral performance was segmented into approaching and lane-changing processes. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models were employed to analyze behavioral changes during the approaching process under different conditions, and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering algorithm was utilized for risk assessments. Influencing analysis was then applied to examine the relationship between behavioral changes during the approaching process and lane-changing risk levels. The findings reveal that, compared to the baseline group, the two-stage warning effectively reduced the average approaching speed by 2.25 %, increased the headway distance by 19.02 %, and advanced the starting point of lane-changing maneuvers by approximately 42.8 m on average, all of which contributed to a decrease in overall lane-changing risks. Under high speed limits, despite all drivers adhering to the speed limit, the phenomenon of relatively higher deceleration still persists, leading to unsafe and uncomfortable conditions.<!--> <!-->Additionally, the risk faced by drivers is significantly heightened when traveling at higher speeds in dense fog, further corroborating the necessity of the two-stage warning. The findings provide a theoretical foundation for the development of in-vehicle warning systems for work zone areas, offering practical implications for safe and efficient operations within work zones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107991"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525000776","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work zones present unique risks to both workers and road users due to its complex and dynamic nature. This study developed a two-stage in-vehicle warning system aimed at refining driver behavior when approaching work zones and mitigating lane-changing risks. To accurately capture the thorough behavioral processes of drivers near work zones, a driving simulation experiment was conducted involving 38 participants of diverse genders and occupations. Different warning modes (baseline vs. two-stage warning), speed limits (60 km/h vs. 80 km/h), and visibility conditions (clear vs. fog) were incorporated into the experimental design. The entire behavioral performance was segmented into approaching and lane-changing processes. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models were employed to analyze behavioral changes during the approaching process under different conditions, and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering algorithm was utilized for risk assessments. Influencing analysis was then applied to examine the relationship between behavioral changes during the approaching process and lane-changing risk levels. The findings reveal that, compared to the baseline group, the two-stage warning effectively reduced the average approaching speed by 2.25 %, increased the headway distance by 19.02 %, and advanced the starting point of lane-changing maneuvers by approximately 42.8 m on average, all of which contributed to a decrease in overall lane-changing risks. Under high speed limits, despite all drivers adhering to the speed limit, the phenomenon of relatively higher deceleration still persists, leading to unsafe and uncomfortable conditions. Additionally, the risk faced by drivers is significantly heightened when traveling at higher speeds in dense fog, further corroborating the necessity of the two-stage warning. The findings provide a theoretical foundation for the development of in-vehicle warning systems for work zone areas, offering practical implications for safe and efficient operations within work zones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善施工区安全的驾驶风险评估和车载预警设计
由于工作区的复杂性和动态性,它给工人和道路使用者带来了独特的风险。本研究开发了一种两阶段的车内预警系统,旨在改善驾驶员在接近工作区域时的行为,并降低变道风险。为了准确地捕捉驾驶员在工作区域附近的行为过程,对38名不同性别和职业的驾驶员进行了驾驶模拟实验。不同的预警模式(基线预警与两阶段预警)、限速(60公里/小时vs 80公里/小时)和能见度条件(晴空vs大雾)被纳入实验设计。整个行为表现被划分为接近和变道过程。采用广义估计方程(GEE)模型分析不同条件下趋近过程中的行为变化,采用模糊c均值(FCM)聚类算法进行风险评估。采用影响分析的方法,考察了接近过程中行为改变与变道风险水平之间的关系。结果表明,与基线组相比,两阶段预警有效降低了平均接近速度2.25%,提高了车头时距19.02%,并将变道机动的起始点平均提前了约42.8 m,所有这些都有助于降低整体变道风险。在高速限制下,尽管所有驾驶员都遵守限速,但相对较高的减速现象仍然存在,导致不安全和不舒服的情况。此外,在浓雾中高速行驶时,驾驶员面临的风险显著增加,进一步证实了两级预警的必要性。研究结果为工作区域车载预警系统的开发提供了理论基础,为工作区域内的安全高效运行提供了实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
期刊最新文献
A doubly robust estimation framework to quantify potential bias in linked crash-EMS-trauma data with multi-cohort overlap. Injury severity analysis of e-bike crashes: An age-stratified study of riders aged 40 and above Street vitality and traffic risk: a multiscale analysis of Barcelona and Warsaw Exploring novel surrogate safety indicators measuring conflict riskiness and severity: a case study in Sacramento, United States Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1