Knowledge exchange in peripheral coworking spaces: A study of proximities using social network analysis

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104264
Mikel Oleaga
{"title":"Knowledge exchange in peripheral coworking spaces: A study of proximities using social network analysis","authors":"Mikel Oleaga","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As coworking spaces expand beyond large urban centres into more peripheral regions, they are emerging as potential entrepreneurial hubs, fostering knowledge exchange networks among entrepreneurs, self-employed individuals and other relevant economic actors. However, the factors influencing the formation of these networks and the role that different actors play remain underexplored. This study analyses the structure of the network of a coworking space and identifies the variables that influence knowledge exchanges, measuring the effect of different proximity dimensions. Using a case study of a well-established coworking in Petrer, a small ‘left-behind’ city in Eastern Spain, the study employs a social network analysis approach to analyse the knowledge-sharing network. In contrast to previous studies, it includes a full-network survey of the community, including not only coworkers but also coworking managers, ex-coworkers, and other collaborators of the space. Additional interviews, a focus group, and participatory observation contribute to providing deeper insights. By mapping and analysing the knowledge exchange network, the study sheds light on the behaviour of the different groups in knowledge sharing, highlighting the relevance of the coworking managers in building these networks. Furthermore, the study employs a multivariate exponential random graph model to demonstrate that while more frequent co-location strengthens social ties, temporary proximity is sufficient to stimulate knowledge exchanges. Moreover, non-geographical dimensions of proximity, such as organisational, social, and, to a lesser extent, institutional, are found to have an effect on knowledge sharing, while cognitive proximity does not appear to be significant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As coworking spaces expand beyond large urban centres into more peripheral regions, they are emerging as potential entrepreneurial hubs, fostering knowledge exchange networks among entrepreneurs, self-employed individuals and other relevant economic actors. However, the factors influencing the formation of these networks and the role that different actors play remain underexplored. This study analyses the structure of the network of a coworking space and identifies the variables that influence knowledge exchanges, measuring the effect of different proximity dimensions. Using a case study of a well-established coworking in Petrer, a small ‘left-behind’ city in Eastern Spain, the study employs a social network analysis approach to analyse the knowledge-sharing network. In contrast to previous studies, it includes a full-network survey of the community, including not only coworkers but also coworking managers, ex-coworkers, and other collaborators of the space. Additional interviews, a focus group, and participatory observation contribute to providing deeper insights. By mapping and analysing the knowledge exchange network, the study sheds light on the behaviour of the different groups in knowledge sharing, highlighting the relevance of the coworking managers in building these networks. Furthermore, the study employs a multivariate exponential random graph model to demonstrate that while more frequent co-location strengthens social ties, temporary proximity is sufficient to stimulate knowledge exchanges. Moreover, non-geographical dimensions of proximity, such as organisational, social, and, to a lesser extent, institutional, are found to have an effect on knowledge sharing, while cognitive proximity does not appear to be significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
周边联合办公空间的知识交换:基于社会网络分析的邻近性研究
随着联合办公空间从大型城市中心扩展到更外围的地区,它们正在成为潜在的创业中心,促进企业家、个体经营者和其他相关经济参与者之间的知识交流网络。然而,影响这些网络形成的因素以及不同参与者所起的作用仍未得到充分探讨。本研究分析了共同工作空间的网络结构,识别了影响知识交换的变量,测量了不同接近度维度的影响。本研究以西班牙东部一个“落后”的小城市彼得的一个成熟的联合办公为例,采用社会网络分析方法来分析知识共享网络。与以前的研究相比,它包括对社区的全网络调查,不仅包括同事,还包括共同工作的经理,前同事和空间的其他合作者。额外的访谈、焦点小组和参与性观察有助于提供更深入的见解。通过绘制和分析知识交换网络,该研究揭示了不同群体在知识共享中的行为,强调了共同工作管理者在构建这些网络中的相关性。此外,该研究采用多元指数随机图模型来证明,虽然更频繁的共址加强了社会联系,但暂时的接近足以刺激知识交流。此外,非地理维度的接近性,如组织、社会和(在较小程度上)制度,被发现对知识共享有影响,而认知接近性似乎并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Pearls of Influence: The Interactive Dynamics of Influencer and Place Branding in Shanxia Lake Town Pearl Cluster Platform Necropolitics: Digital Media Representations of Climate Change in the Pacific Islands Region Strategic dissonance: REDD+ implementation narratives and practices in Colombia Immobile mobility: Iranian migrant women between “here” and “there” Stakeholders’ conflicting orders and classifications of the environment and land use as drivers of environmental conflicts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1