Multi-objective Bayesian optimisation on the textural properties of plant-based meat analogues through high-moisture extrusion

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Food Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2025.112566
Alicia Hui Ping Theng , Madhavkrishnan Lakshminarayanan , Dayna Shu Min Ong , Xin Yi Hua , Chuan Sheng Foo , Edwin Khoo , Jie Hong Chiang
{"title":"Multi-objective Bayesian optimisation on the textural properties of plant-based meat analogues through high-moisture extrusion","authors":"Alicia Hui Ping Theng ,&nbsp;Madhavkrishnan Lakshminarayanan ,&nbsp;Dayna Shu Min Ong ,&nbsp;Xin Yi Hua ,&nbsp;Chuan Sheng Foo ,&nbsp;Edwin Khoo ,&nbsp;Jie Hong Chiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2025.112566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plant-based high-moisture meat analogues (HMMA) have gained market traction as sustainable alternatives to conventional meat. However, broader consumer adoption hinges on their ability to closely mimic the textural and sensory properties of real meat. While textural characterisation of HMMA, including hardness, springiness, chewiness, and cutting force, has been reported, optimising HMMA production to achieve these properties remains a challenge. This study presents a human-guided multi-objective Bayesian optimisation (MOBO) framework to optimise the textural properties of HMMAs that were produced by high-moisture extrusion cooking. A Gaussian process surrogate model was employed to map the relationship between extrusion parameters (moisture content, barrel temperature, and screw speed) and HMMA textural properties, and the MOBO framework used this surrogate model to generate promising candidates for the subsequent trials. The objective was for HMMAs to attain the texture of cooked chicken breast meat. Our results demonstrated the effectiveness of MOBO in guiding the optimisation process. The Pareto front, a set comprising optimal trade-off values of hardness and cutting force such that improving one necessarily degrades another, was monitored across multiple trials, converging towards the desired target values for hardness and cutting force with a range of difference between −5.23% and −7.10% and −14.67%–7.33%, respectively. This proof-of-concept framework lays the groundwork for future studies exploring more complex extrusion parameters and expanding the range of targeted meat analogues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Engineering","volume":"396 ","pages":"Article 112566"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260877425001013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-based high-moisture meat analogues (HMMA) have gained market traction as sustainable alternatives to conventional meat. However, broader consumer adoption hinges on their ability to closely mimic the textural and sensory properties of real meat. While textural characterisation of HMMA, including hardness, springiness, chewiness, and cutting force, has been reported, optimising HMMA production to achieve these properties remains a challenge. This study presents a human-guided multi-objective Bayesian optimisation (MOBO) framework to optimise the textural properties of HMMAs that were produced by high-moisture extrusion cooking. A Gaussian process surrogate model was employed to map the relationship between extrusion parameters (moisture content, barrel temperature, and screw speed) and HMMA textural properties, and the MOBO framework used this surrogate model to generate promising candidates for the subsequent trials. The objective was for HMMAs to attain the texture of cooked chicken breast meat. Our results demonstrated the effectiveness of MOBO in guiding the optimisation process. The Pareto front, a set comprising optimal trade-off values of hardness and cutting force such that improving one necessarily degrades another, was monitored across multiple trials, converging towards the desired target values for hardness and cutting force with a range of difference between −5.23% and −7.10% and −14.67%–7.33%, respectively. This proof-of-concept framework lays the groundwork for future studies exploring more complex extrusion parameters and expanding the range of targeted meat analogues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Engineering
Journal of Food Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
5.50%
发文量
275
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research and review papers on any subject at the interface between food and engineering, particularly those of relevance to industry, including: Engineering properties of foods, food physics and physical chemistry; processing, measurement, control, packaging, storage and distribution; engineering aspects of the design and production of novel foods and of food service and catering; design and operation of food processes, plant and equipment; economics of food engineering, including the economics of alternative processes. Accounts of food engineering achievements are of particular value.
期刊最新文献
A novel phase optimization method to improve microwave heating uniformity Generic insights into the softening-related biopolymer changes during cooking of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions of different market classes Impact of specific power input and treatment chamber design on product-process-interactions during ohmic baking of wheat bread Editorial Board Conceptualizing and advancing on Extended Reality applications in food science and technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1