“Beyond material recovery: Exergy and environmental analysis of silicon solar panel recycling”

IF 6.3 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113561
Šimon Jech , Neill Bartie , Gulsah Tas , Kati Miettunen , Rodrigo Serna-Guerrero , Annukka Santasalo-Aarnio
{"title":"“Beyond material recovery: Exergy and environmental analysis of silicon solar panel recycling”","authors":"Šimon Jech ,&nbsp;Neill Bartie ,&nbsp;Gulsah Tas ,&nbsp;Kati Miettunen ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Serna-Guerrero ,&nbsp;Annukka Santasalo-Aarnio","doi":"10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The recycling of silicon solar panels is vital to ensure critical material recovery and to sustain the manufacturing of new panels in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. While various recycling methods based on thermal, chemical, or mechanical separation of the solar panel layers have been studied, a comprehensive thermodynamic and environmental analysis is required to allow holistic comparison within the circular economy framework. Here, such an analysis is performed for four different silicon solar panel recycling processes. First, the processes were simulated in HSC chemistry<sup>TM</sup> to analyse the flows of exergy. Subsequently, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted to understand the environmental benefits and drawbacks of each method. Combined Exergy-LCA analysis showed that a slightly less exergy-efficient process, namely pyrolysis can ultimately has the lowest environmental impact out of the four processes. In contrast chemical treatment of the encapsulant exhibited comparably worse performance due to its increased resource consumption. On the material level, high-value material recovery, if realized, could be thermodynamically and environmentally advantageous. The recovery methods presented here could be further improved if heat integration or the use of natural solvents would be considered. These unique findings demonstrate that weighing exergy - Life Cycle Analysis trade-offs across different recycling approaches could navigate future developments towards more sustainable solar panel recycling. Therefore, such an approach is recommended over solely focusing on material recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":429,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","volume":"286 ","pages":"Article 113561"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092702482500162X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recycling of silicon solar panels is vital to ensure critical material recovery and to sustain the manufacturing of new panels in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. While various recycling methods based on thermal, chemical, or mechanical separation of the solar panel layers have been studied, a comprehensive thermodynamic and environmental analysis is required to allow holistic comparison within the circular economy framework. Here, such an analysis is performed for four different silicon solar panel recycling processes. First, the processes were simulated in HSC chemistryTM to analyse the flows of exergy. Subsequently, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted to understand the environmental benefits and drawbacks of each method. Combined Exergy-LCA analysis showed that a slightly less exergy-efficient process, namely pyrolysis can ultimately has the lowest environmental impact out of the four processes. In contrast chemical treatment of the encapsulant exhibited comparably worse performance due to its increased resource consumption. On the material level, high-value material recovery, if realized, could be thermodynamically and environmentally advantageous. The recovery methods presented here could be further improved if heat integration or the use of natural solvents would be considered. These unique findings demonstrate that weighing exergy - Life Cycle Analysis trade-offs across different recycling approaches could navigate future developments towards more sustainable solar panel recycling. Therefore, such an approach is recommended over solely focusing on material recovery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越材料回收:硅太阳能电池板回收的能源和环境分析
硅太阳能电池板的回收对于确保关键材料的回收和维持符合联合国可持续发展目标的新电池板的制造至关重要。虽然已经研究了基于热、化学或机械分离太阳能电池板层的各种回收方法,但需要进行全面的热力学和环境分析,以便在循环经济框架内进行整体比较。在这里,对四种不同的硅太阳能电池板回收过程进行了这样的分析。首先,在HSC化学tm中模拟了这些过程,分析了火用的流动。随后,进行了生命周期评估(LCA),以了解每种方法的环境效益和缺点。结合Exergy-LCA分析表明,在四种工艺中,火用效率略低的热解工艺最终对环境的影响最低。相比之下,化学处理的封装剂表现出相对较差的性能,由于其增加的资源消耗。在材料层面,高价值的材料回收,如果实现,可能是热力学和环境有利的。如果考虑热集成或使用天然溶剂,本文提出的回收方法可以进一步改进。这些独特的发现表明,权衡不同回收方法之间的能量-生命周期分析权衡可以引导未来发展走向更可持续的太阳能电池板回收。因此,建议采用这种方法,而不是只关注材料回收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
11.60%
发文量
513
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells is intended as a vehicle for the dissemination of research results on materials science and technology related to photovoltaic, photothermal and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Materials science is taken in the broadest possible sense and encompasses physics, chemistry, optics, materials fabrication and analysis for all types of materials.
期刊最新文献
Utilizing benzothiadiazole-linked viologen and ionic liquid to fabricate aqueous gel-based electrochromic devices with broad absorption Simulation study on rapid and reversible structural coloration in two-dimensional photonic crystals enabled by low-voltage dielectric elastomer actuators with annular interdigital electrodes Design and application of a visible-light-driven Bi2O3-BiOBr dual-photoelectrode photocatalytic fuel cell Durable graphene oxide modified chitosan/waterborne polyurethane aerogel for solar-driven interfacial evaporation Performance enhancement of Hitec molten salt through TiB2 and ZrB2 nanoadditives for High-Temperature TES and CSP applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1