Comparative analysis of thermal management systems in electric vehicles at extreme weather conditions: Case study on Nissan Leaf 2019 Plus, Chevrolet Bolt 2020 and Tesla Model 3 2020

IF 10.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119706
Rabih Al Haddad , Charbel Mansour , Namdoo Kim , Jigu Seo , Kevin Stutenberg , Maroun Nemer
{"title":"Comparative analysis of thermal management systems in electric vehicles at extreme weather conditions: Case study on Nissan Leaf 2019 Plus, Chevrolet Bolt 2020 and Tesla Model 3 2020","authors":"Rabih Al Haddad ,&nbsp;Charbel Mansour ,&nbsp;Namdoo Kim ,&nbsp;Jigu Seo ,&nbsp;Kevin Stutenberg ,&nbsp;Maroun Nemer","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the surge in electric vehicle (EV) adoption and the need for extended driving ranges, optimizing energy efficiency, particularly through thermal management, is critical, especially in extreme weather. Managing the substantial energy needed for cabin climate control and battery temperature regulation can increase energy demands by over 50 %, severely limiting range. This study conducts a comparative analysis of thermal management systems (TMS) in three popular EV vehicles, 2020 Chevrolet Bolt, 2019 Nissan Leaf Plus, and 2020 Tesla Model 3, evaluating their distinct TMS configurations and performance under varied weather conditions. Using both numerical simulations and experimental data collected on a controlled test bench at Argonne National Laboratory, we assess how TMS architecture and operational modes influence energy consumption and range. A comprehensive TMS model was developed, integrating cabin and battery thermal sub-models in the Autonomie software platform, to simulate temperature fluctuations and range impacts. Cabin climate was modeled using a mono-zonal approach, while battery cell temperature distribution was estimated through a 2D nodal structure. Each vehicle’s distinct TMS setup was evaluated: the Chevrolet Bolt and Tesla Model 3 use a dual evaporator vapor compression cycle with a PTC heater for the cabin and a coolant loop for battery thermal management; the Nissan Leaf Plus employs a heat pump with a PTC heater for the cabin and air-cooling for the battery. Tests conducted at ambient temperatures of 35 °C, 22 °C, −7°C, and −18 °C reveal significant differences in energy use and range reduction across both configurations and conditions. At 35 °C, the Tesla Model 3, Chevrolet Bolt, and Nissan Leaf Plus have a range reduction of 8 %, 9 %, and 13 %, respectively, due to air conditioning. In winter, heating technology is paramount; at −7°C, the Nissan Leaf’s heat pump configuration achieves a lower range reduction (19.3 %) compared to the Tesla and Chevrolet Bolt PTC heaters, which reduce range by 28.3 % and 31 %, respectively. This study provides valuable insights for automotive engineers, EV technology researchers, and thermal management system designers aiming to enhance electric vehicle performance by understanding how different weather conditions and TMS architectures impact energy consumption and driving range.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 119706"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425002298","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the surge in electric vehicle (EV) adoption and the need for extended driving ranges, optimizing energy efficiency, particularly through thermal management, is critical, especially in extreme weather. Managing the substantial energy needed for cabin climate control and battery temperature regulation can increase energy demands by over 50 %, severely limiting range. This study conducts a comparative analysis of thermal management systems (TMS) in three popular EV vehicles, 2020 Chevrolet Bolt, 2019 Nissan Leaf Plus, and 2020 Tesla Model 3, evaluating their distinct TMS configurations and performance under varied weather conditions. Using both numerical simulations and experimental data collected on a controlled test bench at Argonne National Laboratory, we assess how TMS architecture and operational modes influence energy consumption and range. A comprehensive TMS model was developed, integrating cabin and battery thermal sub-models in the Autonomie software platform, to simulate temperature fluctuations and range impacts. Cabin climate was modeled using a mono-zonal approach, while battery cell temperature distribution was estimated through a 2D nodal structure. Each vehicle’s distinct TMS setup was evaluated: the Chevrolet Bolt and Tesla Model 3 use a dual evaporator vapor compression cycle with a PTC heater for the cabin and a coolant loop for battery thermal management; the Nissan Leaf Plus employs a heat pump with a PTC heater for the cabin and air-cooling for the battery. Tests conducted at ambient temperatures of 35 °C, 22 °C, −7°C, and −18 °C reveal significant differences in energy use and range reduction across both configurations and conditions. At 35 °C, the Tesla Model 3, Chevrolet Bolt, and Nissan Leaf Plus have a range reduction of 8 %, 9 %, and 13 %, respectively, due to air conditioning. In winter, heating technology is paramount; at −7°C, the Nissan Leaf’s heat pump configuration achieves a lower range reduction (19.3 %) compared to the Tesla and Chevrolet Bolt PTC heaters, which reduce range by 28.3 % and 31 %, respectively. This study provides valuable insights for automotive engineers, EV technology researchers, and thermal management system designers aiming to enhance electric vehicle performance by understanding how different weather conditions and TMS architectures impact energy consumption and driving range.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极端天气条件下电动汽车热管理系统的对比分析——以日产Leaf 2019 Plus、雪佛兰Bolt 2020和特斯拉Model 3 2020为例
随着电动汽车(EV)的普及和对续航里程的需求激增,优化能源效率(尤其是通过热管理)至关重要,尤其是在极端天气下。管理客舱气候控制和电池温度调节所需的大量能源可以使能源需求增加50%以上,严重限制了续航里程。本研究对三款流行的电动汽车(2020款雪佛兰Bolt、2019款日产Leaf Plus和2020款特斯拉Model 3)的热管理系统(TMS)进行了比较分析,评估了它们在不同天气条件下的不同TMS配置和性能。利用数值模拟和在Argonne国家实验室的受控测试台上收集的实验数据,我们评估了TMS架构和操作模式如何影响能耗和范围。开发了一个综合的TMS模型,在Autonomie软件平台中集成了座舱和电池热子模型,以模拟温度波动和里程影响。机舱气候采用单区方法建模,而电池温度分布通过二维节点结构估计。评估了每辆车不同的TMS设置:雪佛兰Bolt和特斯拉Model 3采用双蒸发器蒸汽压缩循环,机舱采用PTC加热器,电池热管理采用冷却剂循环;尼桑Leaf Plus采用了带有PTC加热器的热泵,用于机舱,空气冷却用于电池。在35°C、22°C、- 7°C和- 18°C的环境温度下进行的测试显示,在两种配置和条件下,能源使用和续航里程减少存在显著差异。在35°C时,由于空调的影响,特斯拉Model 3、雪佛兰Bolt和日产Leaf Plus的续航里程分别减少了8%、9%和13%。在冬季,供暖技术至关重要;与特斯拉和雪佛兰Bolt PTC加热器(分别减少28.3%和31%)相比,日产Leaf的热泵配置在- 7°C时的减程率(19.3%)较低。这项研究为汽车工程师、电动汽车技术研究人员和热管理系统设计师提供了有价值的见解,旨在通过了解不同天气条件和TMS架构如何影响能源消耗和行驶里程来提高电动汽车的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning framework for prediction of plasma-based carbon dioxide conversion: Balancing computational efficiency with experimental efforts Integrative and systematic review on biomass and waste co-gasification: challenges, trends, and future perspectives Design and CFD driven preheating thermal performance analysis of the primary chamber of plasma pyrolysis plant for biomedical waste disposal: From experimental validation to 200 kg/h scale-up Performance and feasibility of integrated microgrid and microalgae hybrid systems for net-zero energy solutions Decarbonisation strategy for district heating based on an existing gas-turbine combined heat and power plant: A novel approach with long-term scenario techno-economic optimisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1