Policy contention and the movement-party relationship: Pro-choice mobilization in Poland, 2020–21

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Womens Studies International Forum Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103083
Olga Zelinska
{"title":"Policy contention and the movement-party relationship: Pro-choice mobilization in Poland, 2020–21","authors":"Olga Zelinska","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policy contention occurs when social movements and political parties struggle over a specific policy, e.g. regarding reproductive rights. Yet, the empirical literature on movement-party relationships focuses on general social change and not on contention over specific policies. To address this gap, I analyze the 2020 Women's Strike protests in Poland using newspaper data and interviews with liberal politicians. Ideological alignment proved crucial to movement-party relations, as Polish conservative politicians and pro-choice activists displayed mutual hostility. Hostility within the movements and liberal parties was rooted in reciprocal distrust over past conflicts between pro-choice activists and liberal parties. To strengthen alliances beyond the moment of policy contention, activists forged relationships with individual politicians and urged parties to clarify their stance on reproductive rights. The 2020 protests also prompted some liberal parties to adopt a clearer pro-choice position.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 103083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525000329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy contention occurs when social movements and political parties struggle over a specific policy, e.g. regarding reproductive rights. Yet, the empirical literature on movement-party relationships focuses on general social change and not on contention over specific policies. To address this gap, I analyze the 2020 Women's Strike protests in Poland using newspaper data and interviews with liberal politicians. Ideological alignment proved crucial to movement-party relations, as Polish conservative politicians and pro-choice activists displayed mutual hostility. Hostility within the movements and liberal parties was rooted in reciprocal distrust over past conflicts between pro-choice activists and liberal parties. To strengthen alliances beyond the moment of policy contention, activists forged relationships with individual politicians and urged parties to clarify their stance on reproductive rights. The 2020 protests also prompted some liberal parties to adopt a clearer pro-choice position.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策争论和运动-政党关系:波兰支持选择的动员,2020-21
当社会运动和政党就一项具体政策(例如关于生育权利)进行斗争时,就会发生政策争论。然而,关于运动-政党关系的实证文献关注的是一般的社会变革,而不是对具体政策的争论。为了解决这一差距,我使用报纸数据和对自由派政治家的采访来分析2020年波兰的妇女罢工抗议活动。意识形态的一致对运动党关系至关重要,因为波兰保守派政治家和支持堕胎的活动人士表现出相互敌意。这些运动和自由派政党之间的敌意源于过去支持堕胎的活动人士和自由派政党之间的冲突,双方互不信任。为了在政策争论之后加强联盟,活动人士与个别政客建立了关系,并敦促各政党澄清他们在生育权利方面的立场。2020年的抗议活动也促使一些自由派政党采取了更明确的支持堕胎的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
期刊最新文献
Religious identity, national sovereignty, and sexual minority rights in the 2024 and 2025 Romanian presidential elections: A qualitative study of candidate discourses and voter alignments Stigma, surveillance, and feminized aftermaths: An intersectional feminist inquiry into the lives of women and children in former terrorist families in Indonesia ‘Is Romania ready for a female president?’: Motherhood, nation and gender in the performance of women presidential candidates (2024–2025) Reframing folklore: Women's desire, duty, and agency in Paheli Friendship as feminist resistance across seven decades: How three Kibbutz women navigated community collectivism, 1920s–1990s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1