Hoping to mine: The nascent critical materials industry in the United States

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105528
Kelly Lynn Anderson, Shannon Halinski, Khoi Hua, John A. Rupp, John D. Graham
{"title":"Hoping to mine: The nascent critical materials industry in the United States","authors":"Kelly Lynn Anderson,&nbsp;Shannon Halinski,&nbsp;Khoi Hua,&nbsp;John A. Rupp,&nbsp;John D. Graham","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The surge in demand for lithium-ion batteries, driven by the increase in production of electric vehicles, necessitates a robust supply of critical materials. At present, there is no efficient way for scholars or practitioners to access project-specific information about policy-aspects of the critical-material mining sector in the U.S. To address this gap, this article presents the Database of EV Critical Material Projects (DEV-CaMP), a comprehensive and publicly accessible resource to analyze the state of the EV-specific critical material mining sector in the U.S. The database describes planned and active U.S. mines and processing facilities for seven key EV-related materials: cobalt, copper, graphite, lithium, manganese, nickel, and neodymium. Included are 91 project sites, chiefly located in Nevada, Arizona, California, and Idaho. Most developers are headquartered outside the U.S., primarily in Canada and Australia. Lithium and copper projects dominate, with 32 and 31 sites respectively, while fewer projects focus on the other five minerals. Key findings include (1) only thirteen sites are currently active (mostly for copper), with 24 projects delayed indefinitely; most projects [54] are in the exploration or development stages; (2) regulatory and public opposition challenges – like conflicts over water rights, land ownership, and environmental concerns – have impacted 27 sites; (3) federal financial support from the Department of Energy, the Department of Defense, and the Export–Import Bank of the United States has been awarded to 21 projects, mostly for processing rather than mining. Overall, the pioneering database reveals that the U.S. mining sector for EV-related critical materials is emergent yet vulnerable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 105528"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The surge in demand for lithium-ion batteries, driven by the increase in production of electric vehicles, necessitates a robust supply of critical materials. At present, there is no efficient way for scholars or practitioners to access project-specific information about policy-aspects of the critical-material mining sector in the U.S. To address this gap, this article presents the Database of EV Critical Material Projects (DEV-CaMP), a comprehensive and publicly accessible resource to analyze the state of the EV-specific critical material mining sector in the U.S. The database describes planned and active U.S. mines and processing facilities for seven key EV-related materials: cobalt, copper, graphite, lithium, manganese, nickel, and neodymium. Included are 91 project sites, chiefly located in Nevada, Arizona, California, and Idaho. Most developers are headquartered outside the U.S., primarily in Canada and Australia. Lithium and copper projects dominate, with 32 and 31 sites respectively, while fewer projects focus on the other five minerals. Key findings include (1) only thirteen sites are currently active (mostly for copper), with 24 projects delayed indefinitely; most projects [54] are in the exploration or development stages; (2) regulatory and public opposition challenges – like conflicts over water rights, land ownership, and environmental concerns – have impacted 27 sites; (3) federal financial support from the Department of Energy, the Department of Defense, and the Export–Import Bank of the United States has been awarded to 21 projects, mostly for processing rather than mining. Overall, the pioneering database reveals that the U.S. mining sector for EV-related critical materials is emergent yet vulnerable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Do disaggregated natural resources foster financial development? Evidence from linear and non-linear approaches Quarrying CSR index: Social, economic and environmental factors in the analysis of the quarrying industry The role of political stability on crude oil production in Cameroon: Evidence from the ARDL and NARDL models Adaptive simultaneous stochastic optimization of mining complexes: Where is the value coming from? Green finance and privatization of green projects in the fossil fuels industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1