Using Dynamic and Static Techniques to Establish Traceability Links Between Production Code and Test Code on Python Projects: A Replication Study

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Journal of Software-Evolution and Process Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1002/smr.70011
Zhifei Chen, Chiheng Jia, Yanhui Li, Lin Chen
{"title":"Using Dynamic and Static Techniques to Establish Traceability Links Between Production Code and Test Code on Python Projects: A Replication Study","authors":"Zhifei Chen,&nbsp;Chiheng Jia,&nbsp;Yanhui Li,&nbsp;Lin Chen","doi":"10.1002/smr.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The relationship between test code and production code, that is, test-to-code traceability, plays an essential role in the verification, reliability, and certification of software systems. Prior work on test-to-code traceability focuses mainly on Java. However, as Python allows more flexible testing styles, it is still unknown whether existing traceability approaches work well on Python projects. In order to address this gap in knowledge, this paper evaluates whether existing traceability approaches can accurately identify test-to-code links in Python projects. We collected seven popular Python projects and carried out an exploratory study at both the method and module levels (involving a total of 3198 test cases). On these projects, we evaluated 15 individual traceability techniques along with cross-level information propagation and four combining resolution strategies. The results reveal that the performance of test-to-code traceability approaches on Python has many differences with Java: (1) most of the existing techniques have poor effectiveness for Python; (2) after augmenting with cross-level information, the recall surprisingly drops; and (3) machine learning based combination approach achieves the best recall but the worst precision. These findings shed light on the best traceability approaches for Python projects, and also provide guidelines for researchers and the Python community.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48898,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between test code and production code, that is, test-to-code traceability, plays an essential role in the verification, reliability, and certification of software systems. Prior work on test-to-code traceability focuses mainly on Java. However, as Python allows more flexible testing styles, it is still unknown whether existing traceability approaches work well on Python projects. In order to address this gap in knowledge, this paper evaluates whether existing traceability approaches can accurately identify test-to-code links in Python projects. We collected seven popular Python projects and carried out an exploratory study at both the method and module levels (involving a total of 3198 test cases). On these projects, we evaluated 15 individual traceability techniques along with cross-level information propagation and four combining resolution strategies. The results reveal that the performance of test-to-code traceability approaches on Python has many differences with Java: (1) most of the existing techniques have poor effectiveness for Python; (2) after augmenting with cross-level information, the recall surprisingly drops; and (3) machine learning based combination approach achieves the best recall but the worst precision. These findings shed light on the best traceability approaches for Python projects, and also provide guidelines for researchers and the Python community.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
自引率
10.00%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
A Multi-Perspective Review on Embedded Systems Quality: State of the Field, Challenges, and Research Directions Using Dynamic and Static Techniques to Establish Traceability Links Between Production Code and Test Code on Python Projects: A Replication Study Multilabeled Emotions Classification in Software Engineering Text Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Word Embeddings Issue Information BET-BiLSTM Model: A Robust Solution for Automated Requirements Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1