Investigation of Suitable, Readily Available, Sources of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inoculum, and Evaluation of Sulfate Reduction Rates Achieved at Different pHs
Janet Smith, Craig Sheridan, Lizelle van Dyk, Kevin G. Harding
{"title":"Investigation of Suitable, Readily Available, Sources of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inoculum, and Evaluation of Sulfate Reduction Rates Achieved at Different pHs","authors":"Janet Smith, Craig Sheridan, Lizelle van Dyk, Kevin G. Harding","doi":"10.1111/1758-2229.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the suitability of readily available and naturally occurring sources of microorganisms (inoculum) to use for the cultivation of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) for acid mine drainage (AMD) remediation. The selected inocula included AMD water (AMD), mud (MUD) and reed-bed mud (RM) from the AMD surrounds, mealworms (MW), cow dung (CD) and raw sewage sludge (RS). The suitability of the different inoculum sources was evaluated by comparing the SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction and sulfide (S<sup>2−</sup>) production rates at three different pHs. Experimental results showed that the AMD, MW, MUD and CD inoculum did not produce appreciable reduction of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> to S<sup>2−</sup> and were unsuitable sources of SRB inoculum. The inoculum evaluated in pH 2 media did not achieve SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction. Of the inoculum assessed in pH 4 media, only the RM inoculum achieved SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction (40%) with S<sup>2−</sup> production (36 mg/L). In contrast, a notable S<sup>2−</sup> production, RS (114 mg/L) and RM (99 mg/L), accompanied the SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction achieved in the pH 7.5 RS (44%) and RM (30%) samples. The improved S<sup>2−</sup><sub>produced</sub>/SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup><sub>removed</sub> conversion ratios for samples pH 7.5 RS (0.14) and pH 7.5 RM (0.17) are indicative of increased SRB activity and the suitability of these inoculum as SRB sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":163,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-2229.70081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated the suitability of readily available and naturally occurring sources of microorganisms (inoculum) to use for the cultivation of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) for acid mine drainage (AMD) remediation. The selected inocula included AMD water (AMD), mud (MUD) and reed-bed mud (RM) from the AMD surrounds, mealworms (MW), cow dung (CD) and raw sewage sludge (RS). The suitability of the different inoculum sources was evaluated by comparing the SO42− reduction and sulfide (S2−) production rates at three different pHs. Experimental results showed that the AMD, MW, MUD and CD inoculum did not produce appreciable reduction of SO42− to S2− and were unsuitable sources of SRB inoculum. The inoculum evaluated in pH 2 media did not achieve SO42− reduction. Of the inoculum assessed in pH 4 media, only the RM inoculum achieved SO42− reduction (40%) with S2− production (36 mg/L). In contrast, a notable S2− production, RS (114 mg/L) and RM (99 mg/L), accompanied the SO42− reduction achieved in the pH 7.5 RS (44%) and RM (30%) samples. The improved S2−produced/SO42−removed conversion ratios for samples pH 7.5 RS (0.14) and pH 7.5 RM (0.17) are indicative of increased SRB activity and the suitability of these inoculum as SRB sources.
期刊介绍:
The journal is identical in scope to Environmental Microbiology, shares the same editorial team and submission site, and will apply the same high level acceptance criteria. The two journals will be mutually supportive and evolve side-by-side.
Environmental Microbiology Reports provides a high profile vehicle for publication of the most innovative, original and rigorous research in the field. The scope of the Journal encompasses the diversity of current research on microbial processes in the environment, microbial communities, interactions and evolution and includes, but is not limited to, the following:
the structure, activities and communal behaviour of microbial communities
microbial community genetics and evolutionary processes
microbial symbioses, microbial interactions and interactions with plants, animals and abiotic factors
microbes in the tree of life, microbial diversification and evolution
population biology and clonal structure
microbial metabolic and structural diversity
microbial physiology, growth and survival
microbes and surfaces, adhesion and biofouling
responses to environmental signals and stress factors
modelling and theory development
pollution microbiology
extremophiles and life in extreme and unusual little-explored habitats
element cycles and biogeochemical processes, primary and secondary production
microbes in a changing world, microbially-influenced global changes
evolution and diversity of archaeal and bacterial viruses
new technological developments in microbial ecology and evolution, in particular for the study of activities of microbial communities, non-culturable microorganisms and emerging pathogens.