Experiences, Attitudes and Preferences of Postpartum Cisgender Women for HIV Prevention and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Education during Routine Postpartum Care.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AIDS and Behavior Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1007/s10461-025-04663-5
Caroline E Mullis, Jessica McWalters, Alison J Goldberg, Aloke Maity, Karina Avila, Sarit A Golub, Marla J Keller
{"title":"Experiences, Attitudes and Preferences of Postpartum Cisgender Women for HIV Prevention and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Education during Routine Postpartum Care.","authors":"Caroline E Mullis, Jessica McWalters, Alison J Goldberg, Aloke Maity, Karina Avila, Sarit A Golub, Marla J Keller","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04663-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The postpartum period presents an opportunity to deliver comprehensive sexual health education. Understanding preferences of postpartum cisgender women (CGW) towards integration of HIV prevention education into postpartum care is necessary to support acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Postpartum CGW were recruited during their postpartum hospital stay in Bronx, NY. Participants completed a survey including two best-worst scaling exercises that elicited preferences for receiving HIV prevention information and PrEP messaging. Utility scores were estimated using a hierarchical Bayes multinomial logit model and mathematically transformed into a probability scale presented as preference scores (PS), with higher numbers representing greater preference. Among 259 participants, 53% had never heard of PrEP before. Receiving information from a doctor was most preferred (13.4, 95%CI 12.7-14.0) followed by receiving information about HIV prevention combined with taking care of their health after having a baby (11.6, 95% CI 10.9-12.3). Latent class analysis revealed three classes: participants with greater preference for high touch services (e.g., in-person visits, doctor providing information), integrated information (e.g., HIV prevention information given in combination with sexual or maternal health information) and high technology services (e.g., a mobile phone application, telehealth visit). Participants preferred PrEP messaging related to themes of effectiveness, motherhood, safety and autonomy. Latent class analysis of PrEP messaging revealed two classes: one with participants preferring messages related to motherhood and safety and another preferring messages related to control and autonomy. The heterogeneity in preferences for receiving information at the patient level suggests a need for patient-centered, differentiated service delivery to support maximum receptivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04663-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The postpartum period presents an opportunity to deliver comprehensive sexual health education. Understanding preferences of postpartum cisgender women (CGW) towards integration of HIV prevention education into postpartum care is necessary to support acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Postpartum CGW were recruited during their postpartum hospital stay in Bronx, NY. Participants completed a survey including two best-worst scaling exercises that elicited preferences for receiving HIV prevention information and PrEP messaging. Utility scores were estimated using a hierarchical Bayes multinomial logit model and mathematically transformed into a probability scale presented as preference scores (PS), with higher numbers representing greater preference. Among 259 participants, 53% had never heard of PrEP before. Receiving information from a doctor was most preferred (13.4, 95%CI 12.7-14.0) followed by receiving information about HIV prevention combined with taking care of their health after having a baby (11.6, 95% CI 10.9-12.3). Latent class analysis revealed three classes: participants with greater preference for high touch services (e.g., in-person visits, doctor providing information), integrated information (e.g., HIV prevention information given in combination with sexual or maternal health information) and high technology services (e.g., a mobile phone application, telehealth visit). Participants preferred PrEP messaging related to themes of effectiveness, motherhood, safety and autonomy. Latent class analysis of PrEP messaging revealed two classes: one with participants preferring messages related to motherhood and safety and another preferring messages related to control and autonomy. The heterogeneity in preferences for receiving information at the patient level suggests a need for patient-centered, differentiated service delivery to support maximum receptivity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
期刊最新文献
Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the HIV Care Continuum and Associated Factors in High-Income Nations: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. An Integrated Intervention to Reduce HIV Risk Behaviors Among Heterosexual HIV-Negative, African American Couples: Pilot Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usefulness Study. Experiences, Attitudes and Preferences of Postpartum Cisgender Women for HIV Prevention and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Education during Routine Postpartum Care. HIV Testing Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Among Persons who Inject Drugs - National HIV Behavioral Surveillance, 19 Cities, 2018 and 2022. HPV Vaccine Uptake and its Predictors among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Living with HIV-in Central Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1