Toward a personalized chronotherapy of blood pressure.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Biomedical Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.bj.2025.100849
Germaine Cornelissen, Yoshihiko Watanabe, Larry A Beaty, Kuniaki Otsuka
{"title":"Toward a personalized chronotherapy of blood pressure.","authors":"Germaine Cornelissen, Yoshihiko Watanabe, Larry A Beaty, Kuniaki Otsuka","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A consensus regarding the optimal time to administer anti-hypertensive medications has not been reached. Possible differential effects of different anti-hypertensive drugs on the circadian pattern of blood pressure (BP) and differential responses of individual patients receiving the same treatment at different times of the day may partly account for the controversy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data available at 30-minute intervals for 7 days from previous studies are reanalyzed to compare the effect of five drugs (amlodipine, atenolol, captopril retard, long-acting carteolol, and nilvadipine) taken 1.5 hours after awakening or twice a day on the 24-hour profile of BP from 7 to 13 conventionally diagnosed patients per treatment group. Similar data from 30 patients receiving losartan/hydrochlorothiazide for at least one month at each of six different times in relation to their time of awakening serve to compare the effect of treatment time in different patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Some but not all drugs affected the 24-hour amplitude and/or phase of BP or the contribution of the 12-hour harmonic term to modify the circadian waveform of BP. While evening dosing increased the 24-hour amplitude of BP in some patients, other patients achieved such a desired effect with morning dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Personalized optimization of treatment timing to best match a healthy circadian BP pattern is recommended, guided by chronobiological analyses of ABPM data collected over several days in view of the large day-to-day variability in all features of the 24-hour BP rhythm.</p>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"100849"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A consensus regarding the optimal time to administer anti-hypertensive medications has not been reached. Possible differential effects of different anti-hypertensive drugs on the circadian pattern of blood pressure (BP) and differential responses of individual patients receiving the same treatment at different times of the day may partly account for the controversy.

Methods: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data available at 30-minute intervals for 7 days from previous studies are reanalyzed to compare the effect of five drugs (amlodipine, atenolol, captopril retard, long-acting carteolol, and nilvadipine) taken 1.5 hours after awakening or twice a day on the 24-hour profile of BP from 7 to 13 conventionally diagnosed patients per treatment group. Similar data from 30 patients receiving losartan/hydrochlorothiazide for at least one month at each of six different times in relation to their time of awakening serve to compare the effect of treatment time in different patients.

Results: Some but not all drugs affected the 24-hour amplitude and/or phase of BP or the contribution of the 12-hour harmonic term to modify the circadian waveform of BP. While evening dosing increased the 24-hour amplitude of BP in some patients, other patients achieved such a desired effect with morning dosing.

Conclusion: Personalized optimization of treatment timing to best match a healthy circadian BP pattern is recommended, guided by chronobiological analyses of ABPM data collected over several days in view of the large day-to-day variability in all features of the 24-hour BP rhythm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Journal
Biomedical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs. Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology. A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Toward a personalized chronotherapy of blood pressure. Elastase Reduces Background Autofluorescence in ALK Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assays for Lung Cancers. A panel of miRNAs in the serum extracellular vesicles serve as novel diagnostic biomarkers for MASLD. A newly designed Flexible Hydrated-Hardening Bone Graft (FHBG) promotes bone regeneration and in vivo calvarial repair. Increased risk of incident alopecia areata among patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A multicenter cohort study in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1