An intelligent multi-attribute decision-making system for clinical assessment of spinal cord disorder using fuzzy hypersoft rough approximations.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1186/s12911-025-02946-4
Muhammad Abdullah, Khuram Ali Khan, Atiqe Ur Rahman
{"title":"An intelligent multi-attribute decision-making system for clinical assessment of spinal cord disorder using fuzzy hypersoft rough approximations.","authors":"Muhammad Abdullah, Khuram Ali Khan, Atiqe Ur Rahman","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02946-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The data for diagnosing spinal cord disorder (SCD) are complex and often confusing, making it difficult for established diagnostic techniques to yield reliable results. This issue frequently necessitates expensive testing to get an accurate diagnosis. However, the diagnostic process can be enhanced by integrating theoretical frameworks that resemble fuzzy sets, which better manage complexity and uncertainty. This integration reduces the frequency of expensive diagnostic procedures, improving the effectiveness of decision-making. The goal of this work is to present lower and upper approximations for fuzzy hypersoft sets, which employ multi-argument-based parameters to improve the traditional lower and upper approximations of fuzzy sets and soft sets. An intelligent mechanism for decision assistance is established by proposing a robust algorithm, that is based on the proposed approximations. To validate the proposed algorithm, a prototype case study for the clinical diagnosis of SCD is discussed. The criteria are further refined by using pertinent sub-criteria, such as functional ability, imaging data, and neurological status criteria. Medical professionals would find the suggested approximations to be a very helpful tool as the results indicate that they could greatly improve diagnosis. This study contributes to the field of medical diagnostics by providing a sophisticated multi-criteria analytical tool that can manage the complexity and inherent ambiguity of SCD diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02946-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The data for diagnosing spinal cord disorder (SCD) are complex and often confusing, making it difficult for established diagnostic techniques to yield reliable results. This issue frequently necessitates expensive testing to get an accurate diagnosis. However, the diagnostic process can be enhanced by integrating theoretical frameworks that resemble fuzzy sets, which better manage complexity and uncertainty. This integration reduces the frequency of expensive diagnostic procedures, improving the effectiveness of decision-making. The goal of this work is to present lower and upper approximations for fuzzy hypersoft sets, which employ multi-argument-based parameters to improve the traditional lower and upper approximations of fuzzy sets and soft sets. An intelligent mechanism for decision assistance is established by proposing a robust algorithm, that is based on the proposed approximations. To validate the proposed algorithm, a prototype case study for the clinical diagnosis of SCD is discussed. The criteria are further refined by using pertinent sub-criteria, such as functional ability, imaging data, and neurological status criteria. Medical professionals would find the suggested approximations to be a very helpful tool as the results indicate that they could greatly improve diagnosis. This study contributes to the field of medical diagnostics by providing a sophisticated multi-criteria analytical tool that can manage the complexity and inherent ambiguity of SCD diagnosis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模糊超软粗糙近似的脊髓疾病临床评估智能多属性决策系统。
诊断脊髓疾病(SCD)的数据复杂且常常令人困惑,使得现有的诊断技术难以产生可靠的结果。这个问题经常需要昂贵的测试才能得到准确的诊断。然而,可以通过整合类似模糊集的理论框架来增强诊断过程,从而更好地管理复杂性和不确定性。这种整合减少了昂贵的诊断程序的频率,提高了决策的有效性。本文的目标是提出模糊超软集的上下近似,它采用基于多参数的参数来改进传统的模糊集和软集的上下近似。提出了一种基于所提近似的鲁棒算法,建立了一种智能的决策辅助机制。为了验证所提出的算法,讨论了SCD临床诊断的原型案例研究。通过使用相关的子标准,如功能能力、成像数据和神经状态标准,进一步完善了标准。医学专业人员会发现建议的近似是一个非常有用的工具,因为结果表明它们可以大大提高诊断。这项研究通过提供一个复杂的多标准分析工具来管理SCD诊断的复杂性和固有的模糊性,为医学诊断领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
期刊最新文献
A mobile app (mWITH ME) for family caregivers of persons living with Alzheimer's disease: development and initial evaluation. Comparing routine health information quality and associated factors among health facilities in the eastern zone of Tigray, Ethiopia, 2019/20: a cross-sectional study. Machine learning algorithms for identifying tuberculous pericardial effusion: insights from a retrospective study in Vietnam. A dual-modal machine learning framework integrating red blood indices and smartphone-captured microscopic images for β-thalassemia screening. AI-assisted tumor board decision-making in pancreatic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1