Provider, staff, and parent perspectives on the feasibility, utility, and implementation of the Family Health Scale in primary care pediatrics.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000944
Nomi Weiss-Laxer, Rheanna Platt, AliceAnn Crandall, Jerica M Berge, Alexandria Wahler, Shirley Ann Russ, Dennis Z Kuo
{"title":"Provider, staff, and parent perspectives on the feasibility, utility, and implementation of the Family Health Scale in primary care pediatrics.","authors":"Nomi Weiss-Laxer, Rheanna Platt, AliceAnn Crandall, Jerica M Berge, Alexandria Wahler, Shirley Ann Russ, Dennis Z Kuo","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Improving child health involves focusing on family capacities and resources, including family health. This study aimed to assess (a) current practices for collecting family information in pediatric primary care settings, and (b) the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of a validated Family Health Scale-Short Form (FHS-SF) to screen for family health from clinic staff and parent perspectives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We piloted the FHS-SF in two urban pediatric clinics in 2022. We interviewed four pediatricians and six staff members and piloted the survey with 25 parents. We employed an exploratory qualitative design that included data from provider and staff interviews and a descriptive quantitative component, including surveys with parents/caregivers. We analyzed interview transcripts with the Framework Analysis method and presented survey results with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinic providers and staff endorsed the importance of the family context in pediatric care and regularly asked household economic questions but did not routinely assess interpersonal health except during transitions (e.g., newborn/infancy and adolescent visits) and in the context of a custody change. Caregivers were, on average, 34 years old, primarily mothers (92%) and Black/African American (56%) or white (20%). Providers, staff, and caregivers found the FHS-SF questions to be acceptable. Providers suggested using the FHS-SF as a \"conversation starter\" or a tool to identify referrals. Staff provided suggestions for implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The FHS-SF could be an effective tool in primary care pediatric settings, contributing to more family-focused care as a foundation for well-being early in the life course. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Improving child health involves focusing on family capacities and resources, including family health. This study aimed to assess (a) current practices for collecting family information in pediatric primary care settings, and (b) the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of a validated Family Health Scale-Short Form (FHS-SF) to screen for family health from clinic staff and parent perspectives.

Method: We piloted the FHS-SF in two urban pediatric clinics in 2022. We interviewed four pediatricians and six staff members and piloted the survey with 25 parents. We employed an exploratory qualitative design that included data from provider and staff interviews and a descriptive quantitative component, including surveys with parents/caregivers. We analyzed interview transcripts with the Framework Analysis method and presented survey results with descriptive statistics.

Results: Clinic providers and staff endorsed the importance of the family context in pediatric care and regularly asked household economic questions but did not routinely assess interpersonal health except during transitions (e.g., newborn/infancy and adolescent visits) and in the context of a custody change. Caregivers were, on average, 34 years old, primarily mothers (92%) and Black/African American (56%) or white (20%). Providers, staff, and caregivers found the FHS-SF questions to be acceptable. Providers suggested using the FHS-SF as a "conversation starter" or a tool to identify referrals. Staff provided suggestions for implementation.

Discussion: The FHS-SF could be an effective tool in primary care pediatric settings, contributing to more family-focused care as a foundation for well-being early in the life course. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Provider, staff, and parent perspectives on the feasibility, utility, and implementation of the Family Health Scale in primary care pediatrics. Marital adjustment and quality of life in fibromyalgia. Multigenerational health-related turning points and impact on health and social outcomes: A systematic review. Pain and mental health variables for youth with chronic pain: The role of caregiver stress, pain, and resilience. In our words: Patient reports of the utility of primary care behavioral health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1