Policy strategies for inclusion of pregnant and lactating women in vaccine research.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf035
Danielle E Serota, Chelsea M Crooks, Emma E McGinty, Sallie R Permar, Laura Riley
{"title":"Policy strategies for inclusion of pregnant and lactating women in vaccine research.","authors":"Danielle E Serota, Chelsea M Crooks, Emma E McGinty, Sallie R Permar, Laura Riley","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pregnant and lactating women (PLW) have historically been excluded from vaccine research, creating inequities in vaccine access and uptake for PLW. US federal research policies create the framework for inclusion of diverse populations, including PLW, in research. We conducted a policy analysis and interviews (<i>n</i> = 29) with experts in vaccine research for PLW to characterize the existing policy landscape and to identify policy strategies to promote inclusion of PLW in vaccine trials. We integrated policy analysis and interview results to inform 5 policy recommendations. Current federal policy does not require or incentivize the inclusion of PLW in vaccine trials. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance on inclusion of PLW in vaccine and other clinical research is nonbinding and lacks clarity. Extant policies do not adequately allay liability concerns among vaccine developers. To address these concerns, we recommend that US Congress pass legislation authorizing the FDA to require inclusion of PLW in vaccine research; incentivize sponsors to complete timely vaccine studies in PLW; create a national no-fault compensation program for clinical research participants, including PLW; remove pregnancy from the \"vulnerable population\" designation in FDA human subjects regulations; and clarify existing federal regulations pertaining to clinical research with PLW.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pregnant and lactating women (PLW) have historically been excluded from vaccine research, creating inequities in vaccine access and uptake for PLW. US federal research policies create the framework for inclusion of diverse populations, including PLW, in research. We conducted a policy analysis and interviews (n = 29) with experts in vaccine research for PLW to characterize the existing policy landscape and to identify policy strategies to promote inclusion of PLW in vaccine trials. We integrated policy analysis and interview results to inform 5 policy recommendations. Current federal policy does not require or incentivize the inclusion of PLW in vaccine trials. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance on inclusion of PLW in vaccine and other clinical research is nonbinding and lacks clarity. Extant policies do not adequately allay liability concerns among vaccine developers. To address these concerns, we recommend that US Congress pass legislation authorizing the FDA to require inclusion of PLW in vaccine research; incentivize sponsors to complete timely vaccine studies in PLW; create a national no-fault compensation program for clinical research participants, including PLW; remove pregnancy from the "vulnerable population" designation in FDA human subjects regulations; and clarify existing federal regulations pertaining to clinical research with PLW.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将孕妇和哺乳期妇女纳入疫苗研究的政策战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Controversies in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis
IF 1.8 4区 医学Orthopedic Clinics of North AmericaPub Date : 2006-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.09.003
Randall T. Loder MD
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Diagnosis and Management.
IF 4 3区 医学American family physicianPub Date : 2017-06-15 DOI:
David M Peck, Lisa M Voss, Tyler T Voss
Controversies in management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
IF 1.9 World Journal of OrthopedicsPub Date : 2016-02-18 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i2.78
A. Johari, R. Pandey
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Medicaid-covered health care visits during the postpartum year: Variation by enrollee characteristics and state. Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers. Correction to: What happens behind closed doors? Investigating care practices in nursing home and assisted living memory care units. The fundamental importance of social insurance for health equity. Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1