A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of remdesivir to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized patients: have the guidelines evolved with the evidence?

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Clinical Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaf111
Michele Bartoletti, Essy Mozaffari, Alpesh N Amin, Yohei Doi, Paul Loubet, Christina G Rivera, Michael Roshon, Aaditya Rawal, Emily Kaiser, Maria Vutcovici Nicolae, Shuai Fu, Thomas F Oppelt, Mel Chiang, Paul E Sax, Andre C Kalil
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of remdesivir to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized patients: have the guidelines evolved with the evidence?","authors":"Michele Bartoletti, Essy Mozaffari, Alpesh N Amin, Yohei Doi, Paul Loubet, Christina G Rivera, Michael Roshon, Aaditya Rawal, Emily Kaiser, Maria Vutcovici Nicolae, Shuai Fu, Thomas F Oppelt, Mel Chiang, Paul E Sax, Andre C Kalil","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background With progressive accumulation of knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 infection clinical management, treatment guidelines recommended several options including remdesivir (RDV), a broad-spectrum antiviral. Given the evolving nature of COVID-19, capturing the totality of scientific evidence from clinical trials and observational studies is critical to inform clinical decision making. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) with meta-analysis (MA) to summarize RDV effectiveness among hospitalized adults. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for interventional and observational studies examining RDV efficacy. A rigorous double-reviewer approach was used for source identification, screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. A hierarchical random-effects model MA was used, with subgroup analyses for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and real-world (RW) studies. Results From January 2019 to December 2023 over 18,000 sources were screened and 122 unique studies were identified, reporting on 25,174 participants in RCTs and 1,279,859 in RW studies. Remdesivir significantly increased survival in the overall population [OR: 0.69 (0.55-0.86); p=0.001] across SARS-CoV-2 variants and disease severity levels: no supplemental oxygen [OR: 0.81 (0.75-0.88)], low-flow oxygen [OR: 0.71 (0.64-0.79)], high-flow oxygen [OR: 0.87 (0.83-0.91)] and invasive mechanical ventilation [OR: 0.78 (0.68-0.90)]. Rehospitalization risk was significantly reduced in patients receiving remdesivir [OR: 0.72 (0.64-0.81)]. Conclusion Our comprehensive SLR, capturing the totality of evidence, showed a significant survival benefit among patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection receiving RDV across all disease severity levels. To assure that healthcare providers are aware of and deploy evidence-based optimal care, recommendations should rely on both RCT and RW data.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background With progressive accumulation of knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 infection clinical management, treatment guidelines recommended several options including remdesivir (RDV), a broad-spectrum antiviral. Given the evolving nature of COVID-19, capturing the totality of scientific evidence from clinical trials and observational studies is critical to inform clinical decision making. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) with meta-analysis (MA) to summarize RDV effectiveness among hospitalized adults. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for interventional and observational studies examining RDV efficacy. A rigorous double-reviewer approach was used for source identification, screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. A hierarchical random-effects model MA was used, with subgroup analyses for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and real-world (RW) studies. Results From January 2019 to December 2023 over 18,000 sources were screened and 122 unique studies were identified, reporting on 25,174 participants in RCTs and 1,279,859 in RW studies. Remdesivir significantly increased survival in the overall population [OR: 0.69 (0.55-0.86); p=0.001] across SARS-CoV-2 variants and disease severity levels: no supplemental oxygen [OR: 0.81 (0.75-0.88)], low-flow oxygen [OR: 0.71 (0.64-0.79)], high-flow oxygen [OR: 0.87 (0.83-0.91)] and invasive mechanical ventilation [OR: 0.78 (0.68-0.90)]. Rehospitalization risk was significantly reduced in patients receiving remdesivir [OR: 0.72 (0.64-0.81)]. Conclusion Our comprehensive SLR, capturing the totality of evidence, showed a significant survival benefit among patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection receiving RDV across all disease severity levels. To assure that healthcare providers are aware of and deploy evidence-based optimal care, recommendations should rely on both RCT and RW data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雷米替韦治疗住院病人 SARS-CoV-2 感染疗效的系统回顾和荟萃分析:指南是否与时俱进?
随着对SARS-CoV-2感染临床管理知识的逐步积累,治疗指南推荐了几种选择,包括瑞德西韦(remdesivir, RDV),一种广谱抗病毒药物。鉴于COVID-19不断变化的性质,从临床试验和观察性研究中获取全部科学证据对于为临床决策提供信息至关重要。我们进行了系统文献综述(SLR)和荟萃分析(MA)来总结住院成人RDV的有效性。方法系统地检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索有关RDV疗效的介入性和观察性研究。采用严格的双重审查方法进行来源识别、筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。采用分层随机效应模型MA,并对随机对照试验(RCT)和现实世界研究(RW)进行亚组分析。从2019年1月至2023年12月,筛选了超过18,000个来源,确定了122项独特的研究,报告了25,174名随机对照试验参与者和1,279,859名RW研究参与者。Remdesivir显著提高了整体人群的生存率[OR: 0.69 (0.55-0.86);p=0.001]:无补充氧[OR: 0.81(0.75-0.88)]、低流量氧[OR: 0.71(0.64-0.79)]、高流量氧[OR: 0.87(0.83-0.91)]和有创机械通气[OR: 0.78(0.68-0.90)]。接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者再住院风险显著降低[OR: 0.72(0.64-0.81)]。我们的综合单反分析(SLR)囊括了所有证据,显示在所有疾病严重程度的SARS-CoV-2感染住院患者中,接受RDV治疗的患者的生存获益显著。为了确保医疗保健提供者了解并采用基于证据的最佳护理,建议应同时依赖RCT和RW数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
When Switching Antiretroviral Therapy Is Not Enough. A 48-week, Randomized Controlled Trial of Doravirine for Individuals with HIV and Obesity on Integrase Inhibitors and Tenofovir Alafenamide: The Do IT Study (ACTG A5391). Limited durability of improvements in infection prevention and control practices following reactive interventions leaves healthcare facilities vulnerable to Ebola virus transmission. Comparison of ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of MDR/DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effectiveness of Updated 2023-2024 (Monovalent XBB.1.5) COVID-19 Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB and BA.2.86/JN.1 Lineage Hospitalization and a Comparison of Clinical Severity-IVY Network, 26 Hospitals, 18 October 2023-9 March 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1