Diversity of dietary protein patterns across Europe – Impact on nutritional quality and environmental sustainability

IF 7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Current Research in Food Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.crfs.2025.101019
Merel C. Daas , Pieter van 't Veer , Elisabeth H.M. Temme , Anneleen Kuijsten , Mirjana Gurinović , Sander Biesbroek
{"title":"Diversity of dietary protein patterns across Europe – Impact on nutritional quality and environmental sustainability","authors":"Merel C. Daas ,&nbsp;Pieter van 't Veer ,&nbsp;Elisabeth H.M. Temme ,&nbsp;Anneleen Kuijsten ,&nbsp;Mirjana Gurinović ,&nbsp;Sander Biesbroek","doi":"10.1016/j.crfs.2025.101019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transitioning from animal-based to plant-rich diets could potentially improve both human and planetary health, but a thorough understanding of the protein component in the diet is essential. This research aimed to identify dietary protein patterns in the European adult population and evaluate differences in nutritional quality and environmental sustainability. Individual-level food consumption data were obtained from 25 European countries (40,101 participants, 18–64 years), available from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database. We applied statistical clustering to classify individuals according to their consumption of 24 protein source food groups. The patterns were evaluated for nutrient requirements, the Nutrient Rich Diet (NRD) 15.3 score, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and land use (LU). Six patterns emerged: <em>Common</em> (42.2%), <em>Fast-food</em> (19.5%), <em>Traditional</em> (14.8%), <em>Health-conscious</em> (12.0%), <em>Milk-rich</em> (9.8%) and <em>Plant-forward</em> (1.6%), with country-specific variations. Most patterns obtained 64–69% of their protein intake from animal products, except for the <em>Plant-forward</em> pattern (52%). The <em>Plant-forward</em> pattern achieved the highest NRD15.3 (+11%), and lowest GHGE (−20%) and LU (−25%) compared to the population average and was most commonly consumed in Austria, Finland, Spain, Portugal and Belgium (4.1–4.5%). The <em>Health-conscious</em> pattern also scored high in nutritional quality (NRD15.3: +9%), whereas the <em>Traditional</em> pattern showed higher environmental impacts (GHGE: +5%, LU: +7%). These findings highlight the diversity of dietary protein patterns across Europe, each with unique nutritional profiles and varying environmental impacts. The <em>Plant-forward</em> pattern provides a promising example for healthier, more sustainable diets, but tailored approaches that consider the cultural and demographic contexts of individual countries are needed to optimize health and environmental outcomes for all patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10939,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Food Science","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 101019"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665927125000504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transitioning from animal-based to plant-rich diets could potentially improve both human and planetary health, but a thorough understanding of the protein component in the diet is essential. This research aimed to identify dietary protein patterns in the European adult population and evaluate differences in nutritional quality and environmental sustainability. Individual-level food consumption data were obtained from 25 European countries (40,101 participants, 18–64 years), available from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database. We applied statistical clustering to classify individuals according to their consumption of 24 protein source food groups. The patterns were evaluated for nutrient requirements, the Nutrient Rich Diet (NRD) 15.3 score, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and land use (LU). Six patterns emerged: Common (42.2%), Fast-food (19.5%), Traditional (14.8%), Health-conscious (12.0%), Milk-rich (9.8%) and Plant-forward (1.6%), with country-specific variations. Most patterns obtained 64–69% of their protein intake from animal products, except for the Plant-forward pattern (52%). The Plant-forward pattern achieved the highest NRD15.3 (+11%), and lowest GHGE (−20%) and LU (−25%) compared to the population average and was most commonly consumed in Austria, Finland, Spain, Portugal and Belgium (4.1–4.5%). The Health-conscious pattern also scored high in nutritional quality (NRD15.3: +9%), whereas the Traditional pattern showed higher environmental impacts (GHGE: +5%, LU: +7%). These findings highlight the diversity of dietary protein patterns across Europe, each with unique nutritional profiles and varying environmental impacts. The Plant-forward pattern provides a promising example for healthier, more sustainable diets, but tailored approaches that consider the cultural and demographic contexts of individual countries are needed to optimize health and environmental outcomes for all patterns.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲膳食蛋白质模式的多样性——对营养质量和环境可持续性的影响
从动物性饮食过渡到植物性饮食可能会改善人类和地球的健康,但对饮食中蛋白质成分的全面了解是至关重要的。这项研究旨在确定欧洲成年人的膳食蛋白质模式,并评估营养质量和环境可持续性的差异。个人层面的食品消费数据来自25个欧洲国家(40,101名参与者,18-64岁),可从欧洲食品安全局欧洲食品消费综合数据库获得。我们采用统计聚类方法对24种蛋白质源食物进行分类。采用养分需要量、营养丰富日粮(NRD) 15.3分、温室气体排放(GHGE)和土地利用(LU)评价模式。出现了六种模式:普通(42.2%)、快餐(19.5%)、传统(14.8%)、注重健康(12.0%)、富含牛奶(9.8%)和纯植物(1.6%),各国存在具体差异。大多数模式从动物产品中获得64-69%的蛋白质摄入量,除了植物向前模式(52%)。与人口平均水平相比,植物正向模式的NRD15.3(+11%)最高,GHGE(- 20%)和LU(- 25%)最低,最常见于奥地利、芬兰、西班牙、葡萄牙和比利时(4.1-4.5%)。健康意识模式的营养质量得分较高(NRD15.3: +9%),而传统模式的环境影响较高(GHGE: +5%, LU: +7%)。这些发现突出了欧洲各地饮食蛋白质模式的多样性,每种模式都有独特的营养概况和不同的环境影响。“向前种植植物”模式为更健康、更可持续的饮食提供了一个有希望的榜样,但需要考虑到各个国家的文化和人口背景的量身定制的方法,以优化所有模式的健康和环境结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Food Science
Current Research in Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
232
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Current Research in Food Science is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the breadth of knowledge in the field of food science. It serves as a platform for publishing original research articles and short communications that encompass a wide array of topics, including food chemistry, physics, microbiology, nutrition, nutraceuticals, process and package engineering, materials science, food sustainability, and food security. By covering these diverse areas, the journal aims to provide a comprehensive source of the latest scientific findings and technological advancements that are shaping the future of the food industry. The journal's scope is designed to address the multidisciplinary nature of food science, reflecting its commitment to promoting innovation and ensuring the safety and quality of the food supply.
期刊最新文献
Genotypic and phenotypic strategies to detect antibiotic resistance in foodborne pathogens along the food processing chain. Gut microbiota dysbiosis and depression: Bidirectional interactions, mediating pathways, and microecological therapeutics. Factors influencing gut microbial colonization: A host-microbe-environment interaction perspective. Corrigendum to "Preservation of duck eggs through glycerol monolaurate nanoemulsion coating" [Curr. Res. Food Sci. 4 (2021) 752-757]. Emerging inorganic nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors for heavy metal detection in food: Advances, challenges, and prospects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1