Beware of Plant DNA in Animal Dietary Metabarcoding: Lessons From a Strictly Insectivorous Bat.

IF 5.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular Ecology Resources Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1111/1755-0998.14100
Luis P da Silva, Miguel Porto, Francisco Amorim, Pedro Beja, Vanessa A Mata
{"title":"Beware of Plant DNA in Animal Dietary Metabarcoding: Lessons From a Strictly Insectivorous Bat.","authors":"Luis P da Silva, Miguel Porto, Francisco Amorim, Pedro Beja, Vanessa A Mata","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.14100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DNA metabarcoding is increasingly used in dietary studies, but it has limitations, such as detecting nonfood taxa. This issue is frequently mentioned in the literature but poorly understood, limiting interpretation of results and mitigation strategies. We evaluate the extent and sources of nonfood plant DNA in dietary metabarcoding, based on 281 faecal samples of a strictly insectivorous bat. We modelled plant taxa detections in relation to pollination syndromes, flowering and fruiting phenology and habitat associations, and we estimated co-occurrences between plants and arthropods. The bat arthropod diet was consistent with previous studies. Plants were detected in 82.9% of samples, representing 148 taxa, and all pollination syndromes evaluated. Plant detections were more frequent during their flowering periods, particularly for those with mixed pollination syndromes, suggesting a relationship between flowering and detectability. Fruiting had a positive, albeit weaker, effect. There was a tendency for more frequent detection of forest plants and less frequent detection of plants associated with riparian and agricultural habitats. Co-occurrences between arthropods and plants were weak and inconsistent. Our results highlight the potential for widespread detection of nonfood plant DNA in metabarcoding studies, calling for great care when analysing the plant component of diets. Specifically, we recommend: (i) implementing strategies for reducing plant contamination during field sampling; (ii) using multiple field and lab negative controls; and (iii) using ancillary information (e.g., sample visual inspection and literature review) to aid interpretation of metabarcoding results. Moreover, we recommend that studies reporting plant consumption results greatly diverging from dietary patterns obtained through other methods should include detailed explanations of methodological steps taken to exclude the confounding effects of nonfood plant DNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":" ","pages":"e14100"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.14100","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DNA metabarcoding is increasingly used in dietary studies, but it has limitations, such as detecting nonfood taxa. This issue is frequently mentioned in the literature but poorly understood, limiting interpretation of results and mitigation strategies. We evaluate the extent and sources of nonfood plant DNA in dietary metabarcoding, based on 281 faecal samples of a strictly insectivorous bat. We modelled plant taxa detections in relation to pollination syndromes, flowering and fruiting phenology and habitat associations, and we estimated co-occurrences between plants and arthropods. The bat arthropod diet was consistent with previous studies. Plants were detected in 82.9% of samples, representing 148 taxa, and all pollination syndromes evaluated. Plant detections were more frequent during their flowering periods, particularly for those with mixed pollination syndromes, suggesting a relationship between flowering and detectability. Fruiting had a positive, albeit weaker, effect. There was a tendency for more frequent detection of forest plants and less frequent detection of plants associated with riparian and agricultural habitats. Co-occurrences between arthropods and plants were weak and inconsistent. Our results highlight the potential for widespread detection of nonfood plant DNA in metabarcoding studies, calling for great care when analysing the plant component of diets. Specifically, we recommend: (i) implementing strategies for reducing plant contamination during field sampling; (ii) using multiple field and lab negative controls; and (iii) using ancillary information (e.g., sample visual inspection and literature review) to aid interpretation of metabarcoding results. Moreover, we recommend that studies reporting plant consumption results greatly diverging from dietary patterns obtained through other methods should include detailed explanations of methodological steps taken to exclude the confounding effects of nonfood plant DNA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology Resources 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
5.20%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines. In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.
期刊最新文献
Beware of Plant DNA in Animal Dietary Metabarcoding: Lessons From a Strictly Insectivorous Bat. EntoSieve: Automated Size-Sorting of Insect Bulk Samples to Aid Accurate Megabarcoding and Metabarcoding. Issue Information Genome and Metagenome Skimming: Future Sequencing Methods for Environmental DNA (eDNA) Studies. Popfinder: A Highly Effective Artificial Neural Network Package for Genetic Population Assignment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1