Emulating Target Trials to Study Perioperative and Critical Care Interventions with Observational Data: Promise and Limitations.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005308
Chelsea J Messinger, Brian T Bateman, Kerollos Nashat Wanis
{"title":"Emulating Target Trials to Study Perioperative and Critical Care Interventions with Observational Data: Promise and Limitations.","authors":"Chelsea J Messinger, Brian T Bateman, Kerollos Nashat Wanis","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estimating effects of interventions is a central task in perioperative and critical care outcomes research. While randomized trials remain the accepted standard for causal inference, trial data are not always available to inform clinical decisions, and some questions cannot be answered feasibly or efficiently with trials. In these settings, studies using observational healthcare data may be used to inform practice. Causal inference from observational data has been reconsidered in recent years, challenging the prevailing notion among clinical researchers that causal conclusions cannot be drawn from observational studies. The \"target trial framework\" is one contribution within a growing methodologic field that helps investigators avoid common pitfalls in observational study design and analysis. Importantly, researchers must understand which biases this framework can-and cannot-help avoid. The authors present an overview of target trial emulation and describe the promise and limitations of this framework for improving observational perioperative and critical care outcomes research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"142 4","pages":"611-627"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005308","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimating effects of interventions is a central task in perioperative and critical care outcomes research. While randomized trials remain the accepted standard for causal inference, trial data are not always available to inform clinical decisions, and some questions cannot be answered feasibly or efficiently with trials. In these settings, studies using observational healthcare data may be used to inform practice. Causal inference from observational data has been reconsidered in recent years, challenging the prevailing notion among clinical researchers that causal conclusions cannot be drawn from observational studies. The "target trial framework" is one contribution within a growing methodologic field that helps investigators avoid common pitfalls in observational study design and analysis. Importantly, researchers must understand which biases this framework can-and cannot-help avoid. The authors present an overview of target trial emulation and describe the promise and limitations of this framework for improving observational perioperative and critical care outcomes research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用观察数据模拟目标试验研究围手术期和重症监护干预:希望和局限性。
评估干预措施的效果是围手术期和重症监护结果研究的核心任务。虽然随机试验仍然是因果推理的公认标准,但试验数据并不总是可用来为临床决策提供信息,并且一些问题无法通过试验可行或有效地回答。在这些情况下,使用观察性医疗数据的研究可用于为实践提供信息。近年来,从观察性数据中得出的因果推断被重新考虑,挑战了临床研究人员普遍认为不能从观察性研究中得出因果结论的观念。“目标试验框架”是方法学领域的一个贡献,它帮助研究者避免观察性研究设计和分析中的常见缺陷。重要的是,研究人员必须了解这个框架能够——也不能——帮助避免哪些偏见。作者概述了目标试验模拟,并描述了该框架在改善围手术期和重症监护结果观察性研究方面的前景和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
期刊最新文献
Individualized Flow-controlled versus Pressure-controlled Ventilation in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Liposomal Bupivacaine, Plain Bupivacaine, and Saline for Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks: The CLEVELAND Randomized Trial. Hemoptysis and Hypoxia after Supraglottic Airway Removal. Predicting Preoperative Consultation Clinician Time Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record Audit Log Data. Maintaining Lower Fresh Gas Flows When Using Sevoflurane: An Observational Exploration of Data from a Single Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1