Mining and analysis of amphotericin B adverse reaction signals: a real-world study based on the FAERS database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2468856
Siqi Wang, Yimei Cheng, Xing Wang, Qian Wang
{"title":"Mining and analysis of amphotericin B adverse reaction signals: a real-world study based on the FAERS database.","authors":"Siqi Wang, Yimei Cheng, Xing Wang, Qian Wang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have become an increasingly serious public health problem. Amphotericin B (AmB) remains the important component in the treatment of IFIs. But its clinical application is limited due to its adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this study we mined the adverse drug event signals of AmB based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2023, using the Reported Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker methods to provide a reference for the safe clinical use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3597 adverse event (AE) reports for the primary suspect drug AmB were obtained, involving 22 system organ classes (SOCs), 1355 AEs. Patients aged 18-60 (47.93%) and female patients (53.82%) were at a higher risk of AEs with AmB. High risk signals in the report include hypokalemia, pyrexia, chill, renal failure. Additional high risk signals not mentioned in the instructions conclude respiratory failure, tachycardia, deafness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mining the adverse reaction signal study of AmB based on the FAERS database provides support for the clinical monitoring and risk identification of this drug.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2468856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have become an increasingly serious public health problem. Amphotericin B (AmB) remains the important component in the treatment of IFIs. But its clinical application is limited due to its adverse reactions.

Research design and methods: In this study we mined the adverse drug event signals of AmB based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2023, using the Reported Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker methods to provide a reference for the safe clinical use.

Results: A total of 3597 adverse event (AE) reports for the primary suspect drug AmB were obtained, involving 22 system organ classes (SOCs), 1355 AEs. Patients aged 18-60 (47.93%) and female patients (53.82%) were at a higher risk of AEs with AmB. High risk signals in the report include hypokalemia, pyrexia, chill, renal failure. Additional high risk signals not mentioned in the instructions conclude respiratory failure, tachycardia, deafness.

Conclusions: Mining the adverse reaction signal study of AmB based on the FAERS database provides support for the clinical monitoring and risk identification of this drug.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of cdki-related adverse events in older patients: a real-world data from the FDA adverse event reporting system database. Assessing adverse event burden in chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment regimens: what's best for patient quality of life? Safety assessment of selinexor: a real-world pharmacovigilance study. Mining and analysis of amphotericin B adverse reaction signals: a real-world study based on the FAERS database. JAK inhibitors and pregnancy in autoimmune disease: safety insights from existing evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1