A novel Adolescent Health Behavior Checklist.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1438775
Yanjie Su, Hua Bai, Ying Li, Yang Zhang
{"title":"A novel Adolescent Health Behavior Checklist.","authors":"Yanjie Su, Hua Bai, Ying Li, Yang Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1438775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adolescents are experiencing rising rates of obesity, insufficient exercise, and sleep disorders. To provide a scientific basis for policymakers to develop targeted and evidence-based health behavior education and policies, this study employed structural equation modeling to design the Adolescent Health Behavior Checklist (AHBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a draft 6-dimensional AHBC, which includes the dimensions of exercise, diet, personal responsibility, sleep, interpersonal relationships, and stress management. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating healthier behavior. Through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), we optimized the construct validity of the AHBC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal factor structure was first determined using EFA with 177 middle school students participating in the process. EFA suggested a hierarchical, 6-factor AHBC with good internal consistency (global Cronbach's alpha = 0.96). Using an independent sample of 349 middle school students, CFA confirmed the construct validity of the AHBC. The final model demonstrated a good fit: SRMR = 0.058, CFI = 0.990. Five out of six latent variables had factor loadings higher than 0.7, and 81% of the item-level factor loadings exceeded 0.7. Additionally, all latent variables had McDonald's omega values higher than 0.7, indicating acceptable convergent validity. Finally, factor correlations showed that the AHBC has good discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AHBC is a 31-item checklist that assesses adolescents' all-around health behaviors, using a score of four as the benchmark value. The shortcomings of the current checklist are discussed, along with future theoretical and practical directions for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1438775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1438775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Adolescents are experiencing rising rates of obesity, insufficient exercise, and sleep disorders. To provide a scientific basis for policymakers to develop targeted and evidence-based health behavior education and policies, this study employed structural equation modeling to design the Adolescent Health Behavior Checklist (AHBC).

Methods: We designed a draft 6-dimensional AHBC, which includes the dimensions of exercise, diet, personal responsibility, sleep, interpersonal relationships, and stress management. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating healthier behavior. Through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), we optimized the construct validity of the AHBC.

Results: The optimal factor structure was first determined using EFA with 177 middle school students participating in the process. EFA suggested a hierarchical, 6-factor AHBC with good internal consistency (global Cronbach's alpha = 0.96). Using an independent sample of 349 middle school students, CFA confirmed the construct validity of the AHBC. The final model demonstrated a good fit: SRMR = 0.058, CFI = 0.990. Five out of six latent variables had factor loadings higher than 0.7, and 81% of the item-level factor loadings exceeded 0.7. Additionally, all latent variables had McDonald's omega values higher than 0.7, indicating acceptable convergent validity. Finally, factor correlations showed that the AHBC has good discriminant validity.

Conclusions: The AHBC is a 31-item checklist that assesses adolescents' all-around health behaviors, using a score of four as the benchmark value. The shortcomings of the current checklist are discussed, along with future theoretical and practical directions for improvement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的青少年健康行为检查表。
目的:青少年正在经历肥胖率上升、运动不足和睡眠障碍。本研究采用结构方程模型设计青少年健康行为检查表(AHBC),为决策者制定有针对性、循证的健康行为教育和政策提供科学依据。方法:设计6维AHBC初稿,包括运动、饮食、个人责任、睡眠、人际关系、压力管理等维度。每个项目都以5分的李克特量表进行评分,得分越高表明行为越健康。通过探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)对AHBC的结构效度进行了优化。结果:以177名中学生为研究对象,采用EFA法首次确定了最优因素结构。EFA提示分层的6因子AHBC具有良好的内部一致性(全局Cronbach's alpha = 0.96)。以349名中学生为独立样本,CFA验证了AHBC的结构效度。最终模型拟合良好:SRMR = 0.058, CFI = 0.990。6个潜在变量中有5个因子负荷量大于0.7,81%的因子负荷量大于0.7。此外,所有潜在变量的麦当劳ω值均大于0.7,表明可接受的收敛效度。因子相关分析表明AHBC具有良好的判别效度。结论:AHBC是一份31项的评估青少年全面健康行为的检查表,以4分为基准值。讨论了现有检查表的不足,并提出了今后改进的理论和实践方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Training needs in data, informatics and technical skills in the US governmental public health workforce. Validation of the Korean version of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale. Translation and validation of the revised and short forms of the Death Literacy Index in the Chinese population. Understanding climate change knowledge and risk denial in a Southern Italian university population: a cross-sectional study. Impact of social alienation on self-care ability in rural older adults through psychological resilience and subjective wellbeing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1