Adverse events and contributing factors in Chinese nursing homes: a multisite cross-sectional study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1518552
Zhangan Wang, Xiang Qi, Ying Shi, Lu Shao, Wei Li, Xiyan Xie, Bei Wu, June Zhang
{"title":"Adverse events and contributing factors in Chinese nursing homes: a multisite cross-sectional study.","authors":"Zhangan Wang, Xiang Qi, Ying Shi, Lu Shao, Wei Li, Xiyan Xie, Bei Wu, June Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1518552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse events in nursing homes, which are unintended incidents causing unnecessary harm to older residents. Previous studies in Chinese populations often focused on adverse events in hospitals, rather than residents in nursing homes. Additionally, they tended to focus on single incident rather than multiple types of adverse events. This study aims to assess the occurrence and contributing factors of multiple adverse events perceived by staff in Chinese nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 691 frontline staff from 11 nursing homes in Southern China (August 2021-January 2022). Data were collected using a General Information Questionnaire, the Adverse Event Reporting Awareness Scale, and the Adverse Event Reporting Habit Scale. Logistic regression models were employed to analyze the contributing factors of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 types of adverse events were screened out in nursing homes, and 477 (69.0%) participants reported that the adverse events \"had happened\" in the past year. The most common events were falls, unplanned extubation, and pressure sores. Clinical staff were 2.06 times more likely than frontline workers to report adverse events (95% CI = 1.13-3.76). Increased awareness (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.15-1.34) and habitual reporting of adverse events (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.08) were positively associated with higher reporting rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant proportion of staff reported adverse events, with clinical staff and those with better reporting habits noting higher occurrences. To enhance resident safety, nursing homes must prioritize preventing high-risk adverse events. Targeting frontline workers with lower reporting awareness and habits is crucial for effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1518552"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1518552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse events in nursing homes, which are unintended incidents causing unnecessary harm to older residents. Previous studies in Chinese populations often focused on adverse events in hospitals, rather than residents in nursing homes. Additionally, they tended to focus on single incident rather than multiple types of adverse events. This study aims to assess the occurrence and contributing factors of multiple adverse events perceived by staff in Chinese nursing homes.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 691 frontline staff from 11 nursing homes in Southern China (August 2021-January 2022). Data were collected using a General Information Questionnaire, the Adverse Event Reporting Awareness Scale, and the Adverse Event Reporting Habit Scale. Logistic regression models were employed to analyze the contributing factors of adverse events.

Results: A total of 13 types of adverse events were screened out in nursing homes, and 477 (69.0%) participants reported that the adverse events "had happened" in the past year. The most common events were falls, unplanned extubation, and pressure sores. Clinical staff were 2.06 times more likely than frontline workers to report adverse events (95% CI = 1.13-3.76). Increased awareness (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.15-1.34) and habitual reporting of adverse events (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.08) were positively associated with higher reporting rates.

Conclusion: A significant proportion of staff reported adverse events, with clinical staff and those with better reporting habits noting higher occurrences. To enhance resident safety, nursing homes must prioritize preventing high-risk adverse events. Targeting frontline workers with lower reporting awareness and habits is crucial for effective interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国养老院不良事件及其影响因素:一项多地点横断面研究。
背景:养老院不良事件是指对老年居民造成不必要伤害的意外事件。此前对中国人群的研究往往侧重于医院的不良事件,而不是养老院的居民。此外,他们倾向于关注单一事件,而不是多种类型的不良事件。本研究旨在了解养老院工作人员感知的多重不良事件发生情况及其影响因素。方法:采用横断面调查法(2021年8月- 2022年1月)对华南地区11家养老院的691名一线工作人员进行调查。使用一般信息问卷、不良事件报告意识量表和不良事件报告习惯量表收集数据。采用Logistic回归模型分析不良事件的影响因素。结果:共筛选出13种养老院不良事件,477人(69.0%)报告过去一年“发生过”不良事件。最常见的事件是跌倒、意外拔管和压疮。临床工作人员报告不良事件的可能性是一线工作人员的2.06倍(95% CI = 1.13-3.76)。提高意识(OR = 1.24,95% CI = 1.15-1.34)和习惯性报告不良事件(OR = 1.04,95% CI = 1.01-1.08)与较高的报告率呈正相关。结论:有相当比例的医务人员报告了不良事件,临床医务人员和报告习惯较好的医务人员的不良事件发生率较高。为了提高居民的安全,养老院必须优先预防高危不良事件。针对报告意识和习惯较低的一线工作人员,对有效干预至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of pedagogical approaches and action pathways for climate change education in medical and health professions training. Attitudes of healthcare workers toward recommending vaccination against herpes zoster: a study based on the health belief model and theory of planned behavior. The effects of microplastics exposure on the growth and development of children. A PRECEDE-PROCEED-based educational program: enhancing self-care and quality of life with implications for biochemical outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Breaking barriers: unraveling the impact of cultural beliefs and misconceptions on HPV vaccination uptake-the narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1