Management of high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis following percutaneous cholecystostomy: results of an international Delphi consensus study.

IF 10.1 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY International journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002325
Antonio Pesce, Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis, George Ramsay, Georgi Popivanov, Kurinchi Gurusamy, Natalia Bejarano, Maria Irene Bellini, Massimiliano Allegritti, Jacopo Tesei, Alessandro Gemini, Augusto Lauro, Matteo Matteucci, Antonio La Greca, Valerio Cozza, Federico Coccolini, Marco Cannistra', Carlo Boselli, Piero Covarelli, Gianluca Costa, Paolo Bruzzone, Giovanni Domenico Tebala, Simona Meneghini, Vito D'Andrea, Andrea Mingoli, Eugenio Cucinotta, Antonia Rizzuto, Mauro Zago, Paolo Prosperi, Massimo Buononato, Gioia Brachini, Roberto Cirocchi
{"title":"Management of high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis following percutaneous cholecystostomy: results of an international Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Antonio Pesce, Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis, George Ramsay, Georgi Popivanov, Kurinchi Gurusamy, Natalia Bejarano, Maria Irene Bellini, Massimiliano Allegritti, Jacopo Tesei, Alessandro Gemini, Augusto Lauro, Matteo Matteucci, Antonio La Greca, Valerio Cozza, Federico Coccolini, Marco Cannistra', Carlo Boselli, Piero Covarelli, Gianluca Costa, Paolo Bruzzone, Giovanni Domenico Tebala, Simona Meneghini, Vito D'Andrea, Andrea Mingoli, Eugenio Cucinotta, Antonia Rizzuto, Mauro Zago, Paolo Prosperi, Massimo Buononato, Gioia Brachini, Roberto Cirocchi","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of high-surgical-risk patients with moderate to severe acute cholecystitis is challenging in clinical practice. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for patients who do not respond to conservative treatment. However, for those unfit for surgery due to high risk, alternative treatment options, such as percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC), are available. There are no clear guidelines regarding the management of patients following PC. The primary aim of this study was to propose indications for PC in high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and to establish management strategies for gallbladder drainage, either as a bridge to surgery or as a definitive treatment, according to available literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After a targeted literature review, International and Italian experts in the field from the Italian Society of Research in Surgery (SIRC) and the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) were consulted to provide their evidence-based opinions on the topic. Statements were proposed during subsequent rounds using the Delphi methodology. Ten statements were provided, and the final agreement is presented in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with moderate acute cholecystitis, a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 6, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-Performance Status (ASA-PS) ≥ 3 who fail conservative treatment should undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the first-line approach. For those with severe acute cholecystitis at high-surgical risk, percutaneous cholecystostomy is recommended to relieve symptoms within 24-48 hours. Once the infection is controlled, we should assess which patients may be candidates for interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For patients selected for surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended at least six weeks after PC placement. In patients not suitable for surgery, such as those with CCI ≥ 6 and ASA-PS ≥ 4, percutaneous cholecystostomy should remain in place for at least three weeks, after which, following radiographic confirmation of biliary tree patency, the tube may be removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus, developed through a multidisciplinary collaboration of interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons, provides a clear and practical guide for managing high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"3185-3192"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of high-surgical-risk patients with moderate to severe acute cholecystitis is challenging in clinical practice. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for patients who do not respond to conservative treatment. However, for those unfit for surgery due to high risk, alternative treatment options, such as percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC), are available. There are no clear guidelines regarding the management of patients following PC. The primary aim of this study was to propose indications for PC in high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and to establish management strategies for gallbladder drainage, either as a bridge to surgery or as a definitive treatment, according to available literature.

Materials and methods: After a targeted literature review, International and Italian experts in the field from the Italian Society of Research in Surgery (SIRC) and the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) were consulted to provide their evidence-based opinions on the topic. Statements were proposed during subsequent rounds using the Delphi methodology. Ten statements were provided, and the final agreement is presented in this study.

Results: Patients with moderate acute cholecystitis, a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 6, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-Performance Status (ASA-PS) ≥ 3 who fail conservative treatment should undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the first-line approach. For those with severe acute cholecystitis at high-surgical risk, percutaneous cholecystostomy is recommended to relieve symptoms within 24-48 hours. Once the infection is controlled, we should assess which patients may be candidates for interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For patients selected for surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended at least six weeks after PC placement. In patients not suitable for surgery, such as those with CCI ≥ 6 and ASA-PS ≥ 4, percutaneous cholecystostomy should remain in place for at least three weeks, after which, following radiographic confirmation of biliary tree patency, the tube may be removed.

Conclusions: This consensus, developed through a multidisciplinary collaboration of interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons, provides a clear and practical guide for managing high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮胆囊造口术后急性胆囊炎高手术风险患者的管理。
背景:中重度急性胆囊炎高手术风险患者的处理在临床实践中具有挑战性。对于保守治疗无效的患者,早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术被认为是金标准。然而,对于那些因手术风险高而不适合手术的患者,可选择经皮胆囊造口术(PC)等替代治疗方案。对于PC术后患者的处理尚无明确的指导方针。本研究的主要目的是根据现有文献资料,提出急性胆囊炎高手术风险患者PC的适应症,并建立胆囊引流的管理策略,作为手术的桥梁或最终治疗。材料和方法:经过有针对性的文献综述,我们咨询了来自XXXXX和XXXXX领域的国际专家和XXX专家,就本课题提供基于证据的意见。在随后的几轮使用德尔菲法提出陈述。提供了十个陈述,并在本研究中提出了最终的协议。结果:保守治疗失败的中度急性胆囊炎患者,Charlson合并症指数(CCI)≥6,美国麻醉医师表现状态(ASA-PS)≥3,应首选腹腔镜胆囊切除术。对于手术风险高的重症急性胆囊炎患者,建议在24-48小时内行经皮胆囊造瘘术缓解症状。一旦感染得到控制,我们应该评估哪些患者可能适合进行间歇腹腔镜胆囊切除术。对于选择手术的患者,建议在PC放置后至少6周进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。对于不适合手术的患者,如CCI≥6和ASA-PS≥4的患者,经皮胆囊造瘘术应保留至少三周,之后,在x线片确认胆道通畅后,可以拔除管。结论:这项研究代表了对这一特定主题的首次共识,其特点是采用了独特的多学科方法,包括介入放射科医生、胃肠病学家和外科医生,他们分享了自己的观点和经验。我们也相信这一共识可以为临床医生在日常临床实践中处理急性胆囊炎高危手术患者提供一个简单、安全的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
期刊最新文献
New insight into the risk stratification and treatment priority of breast cancer: TMT scoring system. Re-examining repair strategies for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm: balancing early benefits and long-term durability. Comment on "Temporomandibular joint disc position affects condylar bone modeling-a randomized controlled clinical trial". A Commentary on "Impact of preoperative frailty on venous thromboembolism risk following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis". Ferroptosis in renal cell carcinoma: integrative multi-omics insights and therapeutic perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1