Bikramaditya Mandal, Konrad Patkowski, Pablo G Jambrina, F Javier Aoiz, Naduvalath Balakrishnan
{"title":"Stereodynamics of cold HD and D2 collisions with He.","authors":"Bikramaditya Mandal, Konrad Patkowski, Pablo G Jambrina, F Javier Aoiz, Naduvalath Balakrishnan","doi":"10.1063/5.0250522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present a comprehensive quantum mechanical study of stereodynamic control of HD + He and D2 + He collisions that have been probed experimentally by Perreault et al. [J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 10912 (2022)] using Stark-induced adiabatic Raman passage (SARP) techniques. Our calculations utilize a highly accurate full-dimensional H2 + He interaction potential with diagonal Born-Oppenheimer correction appropriate for HD and D2 isotopomers. The results show that rotational quenching of HD from j = 2 → j' = 0 in v = 2, j = 2 → j' = 1 in v = 2 and v = 4, and j = 4 → j' = 3 in v = 4 is dominated by an l = 1 shape resonance located between 0.1 and 1.0 cm-1. For collision energies less than 0.1 cm-1, isotropic scattering prevails. An l = 1 resonance centered around 0.02 cm-1 is also found to dominate the j = 2 → j' = 0 and j = 4 → j' = 2 transitions in v = 4 for He-D2 collisions consistent with our prior studies of Δj = -2 transition in He + D2(v = 2, j = 2) collisions. Our analysis does not support the hypothesis of Perreault et al. [J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 10912 (2022)] that a strong l = 2 resonance controls the angular distribution for Δj = -2 transition for both systems. Despite improvements in the development of the potential energy surface, a good agreement with SARP experiments for v = 2 is achieved only when contributions from collision energies less than 1.0 cm-1 were excluded in the computation of velocity averaged differential rate coefficients for both systems. This could be due to some uncertainties in the velocity spread in the experiment that employs co-propagation of the collision partners and possibly, the neglect of transverse velocities in the simulation of the experiment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Physics","volume":"162 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0250522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We present a comprehensive quantum mechanical study of stereodynamic control of HD + He and D2 + He collisions that have been probed experimentally by Perreault et al. [J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 10912 (2022)] using Stark-induced adiabatic Raman passage (SARP) techniques. Our calculations utilize a highly accurate full-dimensional H2 + He interaction potential with diagonal Born-Oppenheimer correction appropriate for HD and D2 isotopomers. The results show that rotational quenching of HD from j = 2 → j' = 0 in v = 2, j = 2 → j' = 1 in v = 2 and v = 4, and j = 4 → j' = 3 in v = 4 is dominated by an l = 1 shape resonance located between 0.1 and 1.0 cm-1. For collision energies less than 0.1 cm-1, isotropic scattering prevails. An l = 1 resonance centered around 0.02 cm-1 is also found to dominate the j = 2 → j' = 0 and j = 4 → j' = 2 transitions in v = 4 for He-D2 collisions consistent with our prior studies of Δj = -2 transition in He + D2(v = 2, j = 2) collisions. Our analysis does not support the hypothesis of Perreault et al. [J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 10912 (2022)] that a strong l = 2 resonance controls the angular distribution for Δj = -2 transition for both systems. Despite improvements in the development of the potential energy surface, a good agreement with SARP experiments for v = 2 is achieved only when contributions from collision energies less than 1.0 cm-1 were excluded in the computation of velocity averaged differential rate coefficients for both systems. This could be due to some uncertainties in the velocity spread in the experiment that employs co-propagation of the collision partners and possibly, the neglect of transverse velocities in the simulation of the experiment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Physics publishes quantitative and rigorous science of long-lasting value in methods and applications of chemical physics. The Journal also publishes brief Communications of significant new findings, Perspectives on the latest advances in the field, and Special Topic issues. The Journal focuses on innovative research in experimental and theoretical areas of chemical physics, including spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, and quantum mechanics. In addition, topical areas such as polymers, soft matter, materials, surfaces/interfaces, and systems of biological relevance are of increasing importance.
Topical coverage includes:
Theoretical Methods and Algorithms
Advanced Experimental Techniques
Atoms, Molecules, and Clusters
Liquids, Glasses, and Crystals
Surfaces, Interfaces, and Materials
Polymers and Soft Matter
Biological Molecules and Networks.