Efficacy of a CBT Self-Help App (Zemedy) Versus an Education, Relaxation, and Mindfulness App for IBS: Results from Post-Treatment, 3-Month, and 6-Month Follow-Up.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002164
Melissa Hunt, Anika Dalvie, Simay Ipek, Sophia Glinski, Riley Macks
{"title":"Efficacy of a CBT Self-Help App (Zemedy) Versus an Education, Relaxation, and Mindfulness App for IBS: Results from Post-Treatment, 3-Month, and 6-Month Follow-Up.","authors":"Melissa Hunt, Anika Dalvie, Simay Ipek, Sophia Glinski, Riley Macks","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>To test the efficacy of a self-help cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) app compared with an active control app.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>IBS is a disorder of gut-brain interaction that can result in significant distress, disability, and psychiatric co-morbidity. CBT is an effective treatment for IBS. Self-help CBT apps can increase accessibility but should be tested against active controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial (NCT04665271) compared a CBT for IBS self-help app (Zemedy) to an active education, lifestyle management, relaxation, and mindfulness control app. A total of 453 individuals were screened in and offered allocation to treatment. Participants who actually downloaded their assigned app (N=267) were evenly split between the CBT app (N=136) and the active control (N=131). Follow-up data (CBT N=74, control N=82) were collected immediately post-treatment, at which point the control group was offered crossover to CBT. Follow-up data were collected at 3 (N=65) and 6 (N=32) months. Primary outcomes included IBS symptom severity and IBS quality of life. Secondary outcomes included catastrophizing, visceral anxiety, fear of food, and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At post-treatment, the CBT group improved significantly across all outcomes. The control group also improved on all outcomes except fear of food. In the intent-to-treat analysis the CBT group improved significantly more than the control group on both primary and secondary outcomes except depression. Gains were maintained at 3 and 6 months, although attrition was considerable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-help CBT for IBS may be effective and can be delivered successfully through apps, although we did not have data on engagement. Psychoeducation about symptom management strategies, relaxation, and mindfulness are active treatment components, but CBT is better at addressing underlying maintaining factors like catastrophizing, visceral anxiety, and fear of food.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goals: To test the efficacy of a self-help cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) app compared with an active control app.

Background: IBS is a disorder of gut-brain interaction that can result in significant distress, disability, and psychiatric co-morbidity. CBT is an effective treatment for IBS. Self-help CBT apps can increase accessibility but should be tested against active controls.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial (NCT04665271) compared a CBT for IBS self-help app (Zemedy) to an active education, lifestyle management, relaxation, and mindfulness control app. A total of 453 individuals were screened in and offered allocation to treatment. Participants who actually downloaded their assigned app (N=267) were evenly split between the CBT app (N=136) and the active control (N=131). Follow-up data (CBT N=74, control N=82) were collected immediately post-treatment, at which point the control group was offered crossover to CBT. Follow-up data were collected at 3 (N=65) and 6 (N=32) months. Primary outcomes included IBS symptom severity and IBS quality of life. Secondary outcomes included catastrophizing, visceral anxiety, fear of food, and depression.

Results: At post-treatment, the CBT group improved significantly across all outcomes. The control group also improved on all outcomes except fear of food. In the intent-to-treat analysis the CBT group improved significantly more than the control group on both primary and secondary outcomes except depression. Gains were maintained at 3 and 6 months, although attrition was considerable.

Conclusion: Self-help CBT for IBS may be effective and can be delivered successfully through apps, although we did not have data on engagement. Psychoeducation about symptom management strategies, relaxation, and mindfulness are active treatment components, but CBT is better at addressing underlying maintaining factors like catastrophizing, visceral anxiety, and fear of food.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Treatment of the Buried Bumper Syndrome​​​​​: A Retrospective Multicenter Study With Inclusion of 160 Cases. Decreased Completion of Ordered Laboratories and Imaging in Telehealth Compared With In-person Hepatology Encounters. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Through-the-Scope Suture System for Gastrointestinal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Preinjection With Ligation-Assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Barrett's Dysplasia and Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Characteristic Histological Features of the Depth of Resection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1