Screening and monitoring patients at high risk for mental health issues in COVID-19: a multicenter pre-post assessment study.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02514-5
Jeonga Yoo, Jeong-Wook Seo, Minsu Ock, Jin Yong Jun
{"title":"Screening and monitoring patients at high risk for mental health issues in COVID-19: a multicenter pre-post assessment study.","authors":"Jeonga Yoo, Jeong-Wook Seo, Minsu Ock, Jin Yong Jun","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02514-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to present the methods for screening, monitoring, and intervening with patients at high risk for mental health issues with COVID-19 at residential treatment centers, which are isolation treatment facilities for COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the mental health status of COVID-19 patients in three residential treatment centers. At admission and one day before discharge, patients received via their mobile a questionnaire containing one question each on anxiety, subjective psychological distress, post-traumatic stress symptoms, depression and suicidal ideation to identify those at high risk for mental health issues. High-risk patients and normal-risk participants who requested consultation were referred for psychological counseling. We evaluated the participants' clinical and mental health characteristics and performed a logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with worsened depression and suicide risk at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5,163 qualifying patients, 1,941 patients (37.6%) had their mental health assessed both at admission and discharge. In total, 661 persons (34.1%) required mental health support at admission and 648 persons (33.4%) at discharge. The patients at high risk for mental health issues at admission had an odds ratio of 5.31 (95% CI: 4.23-6.66) for depression at discharge, compared to those with normal mental health status at admission. The group that requested professional psychological counseling at admission showed an odds ratio of 2.33 (95% CI: 1.31-4.13) for depression at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeated mental health monitoring is crucial for COVID-19 patients. Additionally, a flexible intervention strategy should be developed to implement different screening methods for patients at high risk for mental health issues, depending on the status of the COVID-19 epidemic and available resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02514-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to present the methods for screening, monitoring, and intervening with patients at high risk for mental health issues with COVID-19 at residential treatment centers, which are isolation treatment facilities for COVID-19 patients.

Methods: We evaluated the mental health status of COVID-19 patients in three residential treatment centers. At admission and one day before discharge, patients received via their mobile a questionnaire containing one question each on anxiety, subjective psychological distress, post-traumatic stress symptoms, depression and suicidal ideation to identify those at high risk for mental health issues. High-risk patients and normal-risk participants who requested consultation were referred for psychological counseling. We evaluated the participants' clinical and mental health characteristics and performed a logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with worsened depression and suicide risk at discharge.

Results: Of 5,163 qualifying patients, 1,941 patients (37.6%) had their mental health assessed both at admission and discharge. In total, 661 persons (34.1%) required mental health support at admission and 648 persons (33.4%) at discharge. The patients at high risk for mental health issues at admission had an odds ratio of 5.31 (95% CI: 4.23-6.66) for depression at discharge, compared to those with normal mental health status at admission. The group that requested professional psychological counseling at admission showed an odds ratio of 2.33 (95% CI: 1.31-4.13) for depression at discharge.

Conclusions: Repeated mental health monitoring is crucial for COVID-19 patients. Additionally, a flexible intervention strategy should be developed to implement different screening methods for patients at high risk for mental health issues, depending on the status of the COVID-19 epidemic and available resources.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 中筛查和监测精神健康问题高风险患者:一项多中心前后评估研究。
目的:本研究旨在介绍作为COVID-19患者隔离治疗设施的住院治疗中心对COVID-19精神健康问题高风险患者的筛查、监测和干预方法。方法:对3个住院治疗中心的COVID-19患者的心理健康状况进行评估。入院时和出院前一天,患者通过手机收到一份问卷,问卷中包含焦虑、主观心理困扰、创伤后应激症状、抑郁和自杀意念各一个问题,以确定哪些人有心理健康问题的高风险。要求咨询的高危患者和正常风险参与者被转介进行心理咨询。我们评估了参与者的临床和心理健康特征,并进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定与出院时抑郁恶化和自杀风险相关的因素。结果:在5163名符合条件的患者中,1941名患者(37.6%)在入院和出院时都进行了心理健康评估。总共有661人(34.1%)在入院时需要心理健康支持,648人(33.4%)在出院时需要。与入院时心理健康状况正常的患者相比,入院时心理健康问题高风险的患者出院时抑郁的优势比为5.31 (95% CI: 4.23-6.66)。入院时要求专业心理咨询的组在出院时抑郁的比值比为2.33 (95% CI: 1.31-4.13)。结论:反复心理健康监测对COVID-19患者至关重要。此外,应制定灵活的干预策略,根据COVID-19的流行状况和现有资源,对精神健康问题高风险患者实施不同的筛查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Emotional and attentional anomalies underlying triarchic psychopathic traits: an EEG-startle blink study. Behavioral routines and perceived psychosocial influences associated with perceived academic standing among Moroccan secondary students: a self-regulated learning perspective. Factors associated with alcohol use disorder among young adults from ethnic minorities: a cross-sectional study. Adaptive effects of physical education reform: testing a multilevel SEM chain mediation model for social adaptability development. Effects of uncertainty stress on attentional control in college students: mediating effect of problematic mobile phone use and moderating effect of expressive suppression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1