A better self-efficacy is predictive of lower fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Data from a Almenara Lupus Cohort.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Lupus Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1177/09612033251325320
Manuel F Ugarte-Gil, Rocío V Gamboa-Cárdenas, Victor Pimentel-Quiroz, Cristina Reategui-Sokolova, Claudia Elera-Fitzcarrald, Francisco Zevallos, Zoila Rodriguez-Bellido, Cesar Pastor-Asurza, Risto Perich-Campos, Graciela S Alarcón
{"title":"A better self-efficacy is predictive of lower fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Data from a Almenara Lupus Cohort.","authors":"Manuel F Ugarte-Gil, Rocío V Gamboa-Cárdenas, Victor Pimentel-Quiroz, Cristina Reategui-Sokolova, Claudia Elera-Fitzcarrald, Francisco Zevallos, Zoila Rodriguez-Bellido, Cesar Pastor-Asurza, Risto Perich-Campos, Graciela S Alarcón","doi":"10.1177/09612033251325320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To determine the possible predictive value of self-efficacy on fatigue in SLE patients. <b>Methods:</b> SLE patients from a single-center prevalent cohort were included. Self-efficacy was ascertained with the five instruments of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions plus the PROMIS general self-efficacy. For PROMIS instruments, a score of 50 is the average for a clinical population (people with a chronic condition), the higher score, the greater self-efficacy. Fatigue was ascertained with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F), the higher score, the lower fatigue. Generalized estimating equations were performed, using as outcome the FACIT-F in the subsequent visit, and the self-efficacy instrument in the previous visit; multivariable models were adjusted for possible confounders. All the confounders were measured in the same visit than the self-efficacy instrument. <b>Results:</b> A total of 209 patients and 563 visits were included. At baseline, FACIT-F was 33.0 (10.2), mean general self-efficacy was 47.2 (10.4), self-efficacy for managing emotions was 44.6 (8.0), for managing symptoms was 47.7 (8.2), for managing daily activities was 45.5 (7.5) for managing social interactions was 42.9 (7.9) and for managing medications and treatment was 43.9 (7.0). In the multivariable models a lower fatigue was predicted by self-efficacy for managing symptoms and managing activities. <b>Conclusion:</b> A better self-efficacy is predictive of a subsequent lower fatigue, even after adjustment for possible confounders. Strategies to improve self-efficacy in SLE patients should be encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"9612033251325320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251325320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the possible predictive value of self-efficacy on fatigue in SLE patients. Methods: SLE patients from a single-center prevalent cohort were included. Self-efficacy was ascertained with the five instruments of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions plus the PROMIS general self-efficacy. For PROMIS instruments, a score of 50 is the average for a clinical population (people with a chronic condition), the higher score, the greater self-efficacy. Fatigue was ascertained with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F), the higher score, the lower fatigue. Generalized estimating equations were performed, using as outcome the FACIT-F in the subsequent visit, and the self-efficacy instrument in the previous visit; multivariable models were adjusted for possible confounders. All the confounders were measured in the same visit than the self-efficacy instrument. Results: A total of 209 patients and 563 visits were included. At baseline, FACIT-F was 33.0 (10.2), mean general self-efficacy was 47.2 (10.4), self-efficacy for managing emotions was 44.6 (8.0), for managing symptoms was 47.7 (8.2), for managing daily activities was 45.5 (7.5) for managing social interactions was 42.9 (7.9) and for managing medications and treatment was 43.9 (7.0). In the multivariable models a lower fatigue was predicted by self-efficacy for managing symptoms and managing activities. Conclusion: A better self-efficacy is predictive of a subsequent lower fatigue, even after adjustment for possible confounders. Strategies to improve self-efficacy in SLE patients should be encouraged.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus
Lupus 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…
期刊最新文献
A better self-efficacy is predictive of lower fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Data from a Almenara Lupus Cohort. Prognostic value of the modified National Institute of health activity and chronicity scoring system in predicting end-stage kidney disease in Latin American lupus nephritis patients. The performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Health journey of Nigerian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Real world use of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1