*Deconfounding Sex and Sex of Partner in Mate-Preference Research.

IF 5.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1177/09567976251319038
Ashley J Coventry, Selina Mixner, Benjamin Gelbart, Kathryn V Walter, Daniel Conroy-Beam, Tamsin C German
{"title":"*Deconfounding Sex and Sex of Partner in Mate-Preference Research.","authors":"Ashley J Coventry, Selina Mixner, Benjamin Gelbart, Kathryn V Walter, Daniel Conroy-Beam, Tamsin C German","doi":"10.1177/09567976251319038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much of the previous research examining sex differences in human mate preferences has relied exclusively on heterosexual participants. Consequently, prior work overlooks a critical limitation: In heterosexual populations, participant sex and partner sex are perfectly confounded. Here, we tease apart this fundamental problem by separately examining ideal preferences for male and female partners across two studies-one using a large bisexual sample (<i>n</i> = 442) and another using a sample of both bisexual and heterosexual participants (<i>n =</i> 380). The results revealed that sex differences in mate preferences were largely driven by the participants' own sex. However, both males and females set higher standards overall for the traits of male partners. These findings suggest that a person's mate-preference psychology is shaped by both one's own sex and the sex of the target being evaluated. More broadly, these results expand our understanding of the proximate psychology underlying human mate preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":20745,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":"116-129"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976251319038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much of the previous research examining sex differences in human mate preferences has relied exclusively on heterosexual participants. Consequently, prior work overlooks a critical limitation: In heterosexual populations, participant sex and partner sex are perfectly confounded. Here, we tease apart this fundamental problem by separately examining ideal preferences for male and female partners across two studies-one using a large bisexual sample (n = 442) and another using a sample of both bisexual and heterosexual participants (n = 380). The results revealed that sex differences in mate preferences were largely driven by the participants' own sex. However, both males and females set higher standards overall for the traits of male partners. These findings suggest that a person's mate-preference psychology is shaped by both one's own sex and the sex of the target being evaluated. More broadly, these results expand our understanding of the proximate psychology underlying human mate preferences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
配偶偏好研究中的反奠基性与伴侣性。
之前的许多研究都是基于异性恋参与者来研究人类择偶偏好的性别差异。因此,先前的工作忽略了一个关键的限制:在异性恋人群中,参与者的性行为和伴侣的性行为是完全混淆的。在这里,我们通过在两项研究中分别检查男性和女性伴侣的理想偏好来梳理这个基本问题——一项研究使用了大量双性恋样本(n = 442),另一项研究使用了双性恋和异性恋参与者的样本(n = 380)。研究结果显示,两性在择偶偏好上的差异很大程度上是由参与者自己的性别决定的。然而,男性和女性对男性伴侣的特质设定了更高的标准。这些发现表明,一个人的择偶心理是由自己的性别和被评估对象的性别共同塑造的。更广泛地说,这些结果扩展了我们对人类择偶偏好的近似心理的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Science
Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Psychological Science, the flagship journal of The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society), is a leading publication in the field with a citation ranking/impact factor among the top ten worldwide. It publishes authoritative articles covering various domains of psychological science, including brain and behavior, clinical science, cognition, learning and memory, social psychology, and developmental psychology. In addition to full-length articles, the journal features summaries of new research developments and discussions on psychological issues in government and public affairs. "Psychological Science" is published twelve times annually.
期刊最新文献
To Believe or Not to Believe in Conspiracy Claims? That Is a Question for Signal Detection Theory. Metacognition in Decision-Making Across Domains and Modalities: Evidence From Three Studies. Detection of Idiosyncratic Gaze-Fingerprint Signatures in Humans. Pretending Not to Know Reveals a Capacity for Model-Based Self-Simulation. Registered Report: A Replication Examining Occupational Experience and Performance on the Water-Level Task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1