[Organizational measures to increase work satisfaction in residential long-term care: A cross-sectional survey from Austria].

Alexander Braun, Markus Latzke, Manfred Pferzinger, Adelheid Schönthaler
{"title":"[Organizational measures to increase work satisfaction in residential long-term care: A cross-sectional survey from Austria].","authors":"Alexander Braun, Markus Latzke, Manfred Pferzinger, Adelheid Schönthaler","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With increasing care needs and a decline in nursing staff, measures must be found to make long-term care (LTC) attractive for nursing staff and at the same time encourage them to remain in the care sector. For this reason, the question is answered: \"How do organizational measures, identified by nursing staff, contribute to improving job satisfaction?\".</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a non-proportional quota sample along the federal state distribution, the implementation of measures was surveyed in a cross-sectional survey in LTC facilities. The effect of the measures on job satisfaction was analyzed using multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bundles of measures show a high internal consistency of 0.771 to 0.863. Regression analyses revealed that the bundles of measures, like making LTC more attractive (B = 0.244; p < 0.05), integrating interns (B = 0.222, p < 0.05), duty scheduling and working hours (B = 0.324, p < 0.05), and strengthening relationships (B = 0.078), explain more than 60% of the variance in job satisfaction. Overtime has a negative effect but can be mitigated by duty scheduling (B = -0.017, p < 0.05). Women report higher levels of job satisfaction than men. The type of organization, age and vocational training have no influence on job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Duty scheduling and working hours are important factors. Loss in job satisfaction can be cushioned by focusing on these measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bundles of measures \"Making LTC more attractive\", \"Duty scheduling and working hours\", \"Integrating interns\", and \"Strengthening relationships\" are positively associated with job satisfaction. Accordingly, care facilities that implement these bundles of measures have higher job satisfaction rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With increasing care needs and a decline in nursing staff, measures must be found to make long-term care (LTC) attractive for nursing staff and at the same time encourage them to remain in the care sector. For this reason, the question is answered: "How do organizational measures, identified by nursing staff, contribute to improving job satisfaction?".

Method: In a non-proportional quota sample along the federal state distribution, the implementation of measures was surveyed in a cross-sectional survey in LTC facilities. The effect of the measures on job satisfaction was analyzed using multiple linear regression.

Results: The bundles of measures show a high internal consistency of 0.771 to 0.863. Regression analyses revealed that the bundles of measures, like making LTC more attractive (B = 0.244; p < 0.05), integrating interns (B = 0.222, p < 0.05), duty scheduling and working hours (B = 0.324, p < 0.05), and strengthening relationships (B = 0.078), explain more than 60% of the variance in job satisfaction. Overtime has a negative effect but can be mitigated by duty scheduling (B = -0.017, p < 0.05). Women report higher levels of job satisfaction than men. The type of organization, age and vocational training have no influence on job satisfaction.

Discussion: Duty scheduling and working hours are important factors. Loss in job satisfaction can be cushioned by focusing on these measures.

Conclusions: The bundles of measures "Making LTC more attractive", "Duty scheduling and working hours", "Integrating interns", and "Strengthening relationships" are positively associated with job satisfaction. Accordingly, care facilities that implement these bundles of measures have higher job satisfaction rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
[Organizational measures to increase work satisfaction in residential long-term care: A cross-sectional survey from Austria]. [Cancer-related fatigue: How (good) is the quality of care at cancer care facilities in Germany?] [How can we support medical residents and lateral entrants into general practice during the transition from the inpatient to the outpatient setting? A qualitative interview study]. The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic in general practices compared to pre-pandemic times: Longitudinal questionnaire survey among general practitioners and medical practice assistants in Germany on how the pandemic shaped everyday care. [Real-world data for comparative effectiveness research: Taking stock of available data sources in Germany with special regard to registries].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1