Microbial Contamination of Eye Drops: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001334
Samuel Kyei, Randy Asiamah, Sandra Owusu, Nyaradzo Ellen Masango
{"title":"Microbial Contamination of Eye Drops: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Samuel Kyei, Randy Asiamah, Sandra Owusu, Nyaradzo Ellen Masango","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To profile the array of microbial contaminants of eye drops, both native and non-native to the ocular surface, and associated factors for contamination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Potentially relevant studies were retrieved from major bibliographic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Data were extracted, and study-specific estimates of the contamination rates of topical ophthalmic solutions were combined using meta-analysis to obtain pooled results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 studies that evaluated the microbial contamination rate in 4600 samples were included in this study. The microbial contamination rate of in-use ophthalmic medications is 10% (95% CI: 6%-17%; PI: 0%-78%, I2 =95.1%). The contamination rate among diagnostic eye drops is 13% (95% CI: 3%-42%; PI: 0%-98%, I2 =95.6%), and the contamination rate among therapeutic eye drops is 10% (95% CI: 6%-17%; PI: 1%-63%, I2 =94.9%). Staphylococcus spp. were the most prevalent gram-positive bacterial contaminants [3.55% (95% CI: 1.52%-8.04%; PI: 0.08%-63.46%), I2 =93.2%], Escherichia coli , the most prevalent gram-negative contaminants [1.02% (95% CI: 0.50%-2.05%; PI: 0.16 to 6.04%), I2 =24.8%], and Aspergillus spp., the most prevalent fungal contaminants [0.88% (95% CI: 0.31%-2.51%; PI: 0.03%-22.05%), I2 =89.9%].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a high rate of microbial contamination in topical ophthalmic solutions, which has implications for patient safety and the effort to stem avoidable blindness. Similar to injectable medications, we recommend using single-use vials for topical ophthalmic solutions, as opposed to multi-use vials, which are stored for a protracted period of time and used on multiple patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"297-308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To profile the array of microbial contaminants of eye drops, both native and non-native to the ocular surface, and associated factors for contamination.

Methods: Potentially relevant studies were retrieved from major bibliographic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Data were extracted, and study-specific estimates of the contamination rates of topical ophthalmic solutions were combined using meta-analysis to obtain pooled results.

Results: A total of 33 studies that evaluated the microbial contamination rate in 4600 samples were included in this study. The microbial contamination rate of in-use ophthalmic medications is 10% (95% CI: 6%-17%; PI: 0%-78%, I2 =95.1%). The contamination rate among diagnostic eye drops is 13% (95% CI: 3%-42%; PI: 0%-98%, I2 =95.6%), and the contamination rate among therapeutic eye drops is 10% (95% CI: 6%-17%; PI: 1%-63%, I2 =94.9%). Staphylococcus spp. were the most prevalent gram-positive bacterial contaminants [3.55% (95% CI: 1.52%-8.04%; PI: 0.08%-63.46%), I2 =93.2%], Escherichia coli , the most prevalent gram-negative contaminants [1.02% (95% CI: 0.50%-2.05%; PI: 0.16 to 6.04%), I2 =24.8%], and Aspergillus spp., the most prevalent fungal contaminants [0.88% (95% CI: 0.31%-2.51%; PI: 0.03%-22.05%), I2 =89.9%].

Conclusion: There is a high rate of microbial contamination in topical ophthalmic solutions, which has implications for patient safety and the effort to stem avoidable blindness. Similar to injectable medications, we recommend using single-use vials for topical ophthalmic solutions, as opposed to multi-use vials, which are stored for a protracted period of time and used on multiple patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滴眼液的微生物污染:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:分析滴眼液的微生物污染物,包括眼表的原生和非原生污染物,以及污染的相关因素。方法:从主要书目数据库(PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)中检索可能相关的研究。提取数据,并使用荟萃分析将研究特定的眼用溶液污染率估计值结合起来,以获得汇总结果。结果:本研究共纳入33项研究,评估了4600份样品的微生物污染率。在用眼科药物微生物污染率为10% (95% CI: 6%-17%;Pi: 0% ~ 78%, i2 =95.1%)。诊断性滴眼液的污染率为13% (95% CI: 3%-42%;PI: 0% ~ 98%, I2=95.6%),治疗性滴眼液的污染率为10% (95% CI: 6% ~ 17%;Pi = 1% ~ 63%, i2 =94.9%)。葡萄球菌是最常见的革兰氏阳性细菌污染物[3.55% (95% CI: 1.52% ~ 8.04%;PI: 0.08% ~ 63.46%), I2=93.2%],大肠杆菌,最常见的革兰氏阴性污染物[1.02%](95% CI: 0.50% ~ 2.05%;PI: 0.16 ~ 6.04%), I2=24.8%],最常见的真菌污染物曲霉(Aspergillus spp.) [0.88% (95% CI: 0.31% ~ 2.51%;Pi: 0.03% ~ 22.05%), i2 =89.9%]。结论:外用眼液的微生物污染率很高,这对患者安全和防止可避免失明的努力有影响。与注射药物类似,我们建议使用一次性小瓶的眼药水,而不是多用途小瓶,因为多用途小瓶要储存很长一段时间并用于多名患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
期刊最新文献
Missed Nursing Care in Nursing Homes and Causes: A Systematic Review. Frequent Use of a Spaced-retrieval Mobile App Improves Self-efficacy and Adherence to Safety Protocols in Nursing Staff: A Pilot Study. Evaluation of Interruptions During IV Smart Pump Medication Administration in Intensive Care Units. Analysis of Patient Safety Event Report to Understand the Contribution of Health IT to Diagnostic Error. Mobile Applications for Educating Patients, Caregivers, and Health Personnel on Patient Safety: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1