Independent Risk Factors for Less Than "Top Box" Doctor Communication Patient Experience Survey Scores in an Urban Teaching Hospital.

Richard H Savel, Payam Benson, Carmen Collins, Srinivas Gongireddy, Christina Oquendo, Kwaku Gyekye, Eva Villar-Trinidad, Jill Fennimore, Ije Akunyili
{"title":"Independent Risk Factors for Less Than \"Top Box\" Doctor Communication Patient Experience Survey Scores in an Urban Teaching Hospital.","authors":"Richard H Savel, Payam Benson, Carmen Collins, Srinivas Gongireddy, Christina Oquendo, Kwaku Gyekye, Eva Villar-Trinidad, Jill Fennimore, Ije Akunyili","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the independent risk factors for patients giving a less than \"top box\" score on their Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys in the \"doctor communication\" domain (DCD). After adjusting for age, gender, length of stay, receiving a postdischarge phone call (PC), new medication during hospitalization, highest education level, language spoken at home, and zip code, results from 803 HCAHPS surveys (from January 1 to December 31, 2023) revealed that not receiving a PC was associated with a more than doubling of the odds that a patient would give less than a \"top box\" score for the DCD (overall adjusted odds ratio of 2.22; 95% confidence interval: 1.77-2.78) and a nearly doubling the actual probability of doing so (34.3% less than \"top box\" score if no PC, 17.9% less than \"top box\" score if PC). These findings support the potential value of a post-discharge patient PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"140-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the independent risk factors for patients giving a less than "top box" score on their Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys in the "doctor communication" domain (DCD). After adjusting for age, gender, length of stay, receiving a postdischarge phone call (PC), new medication during hospitalization, highest education level, language spoken at home, and zip code, results from 803 HCAHPS surveys (from January 1 to December 31, 2023) revealed that not receiving a PC was associated with a more than doubling of the odds that a patient would give less than a "top box" score for the DCD (overall adjusted odds ratio of 2.22; 95% confidence interval: 1.77-2.78) and a nearly doubling the actual probability of doing so (34.3% less than "top box" score if no PC, 17.9% less than "top box" score if PC). These findings support the potential value of a post-discharge patient PC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某城市教学医院医生沟通患者体验调查得分低于“顶盒”的独立危险因素分析
本研究探讨了在“医生沟通”领域(DCD)的医院消费者医疗服务提供者和系统评估(HCAHPS)调查中得分低于“顶框”的患者的独立风险因素。在调整了年龄、性别、住院时间、出院后接到电话(PC)、住院期间服用的新药物、最高教育程度、家中使用的语言和邮政编码等因素后,803项HCAHPS调查(从2023年1月1日至12月31日)的结果显示,没有接到电话与患者给出的DCD得分低于“顶盒”分数的几率增加了一倍以上相关(总体调整后的优势比为2.22;95%置信区间:1.77-2.78),实际发生这种情况的概率几乎翻了一倍(如果没有PC,则比“顶盒”得分低34.3%,如果有PC,则比“顶盒”得分低17.9%)。这些发现支持了出院后患者PC的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advance Care Planning, Race, and Age. Best Practices for Diagnostic Evaluation of Unintentional Weight Loss. Determining Causes of Insulin-Induced Hypoglycemia Using an Electronic-Based Trigger. Bridging the Methodological Gap: Integrating Implementation Science With HFACS to Move From Diagnosis to Intervention Design. Physician Practices Promoting Effective Communication with Nurses: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1