Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cemented Tailings Backfill Containing Coarse Aggregate Using a Hybrid Model Based on Extreme Gradient Boosting

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1002/nag.3972
Jinping Guo, Zechen Li, Xiaolin Wang, Qinghua Gu, Ming Zhang, Haiqiang Jiang, Caiwu Lu
{"title":"Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cemented Tailings Backfill Containing Coarse Aggregate Using a Hybrid Model Based on Extreme Gradient Boosting","authors":"Jinping Guo, Zechen Li, Xiaolin Wang, Qinghua Gu, Ming Zhang, Haiqiang Jiang, Caiwu Lu","doi":"10.1002/nag.3972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The utilization of cemented tailings backfill (CTB) presents distinct advantages in managing tailings and underground mining voids, occasionally incorporating coarse aggregate. In this study, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was employed to optimize the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model for predicting the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of CTB containing coarse aggregate (CTBCA). Additionally, feature importance was compared and analyzed. The findings indicate that the PSO‐XGBoost model exhibits high accuracy on the test set, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.091, a mean square error (MSE) of 0.008, and a coefficient of determination (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) of 0.999. The predicted values demonstrate a high degree of consistency with the actual results, exhibiting minimal errors that follow a normal distribution. The feature importance analysis reveals that the cement‐sand ratio holds the highest importance score and exerts a significant influence on the UCS prediction. In descending order of impact, the next most significant factors are curing age, slurry concentration, and the coarse aggregate ratio. The proposed PSO‐XGBoost model effectively reduces the UCS measurement cycle while maintaining prediction accuracy. Thus, this model has the potential to provide a fast and efficient method for predicting the UCS of CTBCA.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utilization of cemented tailings backfill (CTB) presents distinct advantages in managing tailings and underground mining voids, occasionally incorporating coarse aggregate. In this study, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was employed to optimize the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model for predicting the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of CTB containing coarse aggregate (CTBCA). Additionally, feature importance was compared and analyzed. The findings indicate that the PSO‐XGBoost model exhibits high accuracy on the test set, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.091, a mean square error (MSE) of 0.008, and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.999. The predicted values demonstrate a high degree of consistency with the actual results, exhibiting minimal errors that follow a normal distribution. The feature importance analysis reveals that the cement‐sand ratio holds the highest importance score and exerts a significant influence on the UCS prediction. In descending order of impact, the next most significant factors are curing age, slurry concentration, and the coarse aggregate ratio. The proposed PSO‐XGBoost model effectively reduces the UCS measurement cycle while maintaining prediction accuracy. Thus, this model has the potential to provide a fast and efficient method for predicting the UCS of CTBCA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
期刊最新文献
Semi‐analytical Solution of a Shallow Buried Lined Tunnel Under Full‐Slip Contact Condition Numerical Simulation of Debris Flow Impact on Pier With Different Cross‐Sectional Shapes Based on Coupled CFD‐DEM Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cemented Tailings Backfill Containing Coarse Aggregate Using a Hybrid Model Based on Extreme Gradient Boosting Correlation Characterization Method for Thermal Parameters of Frozen Soil Under Incomplete Probability Information Multiphase and Multiphysics Modelling of Rainfall Induced Failure in an Experimental Hillslope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1