Yang Bai , Qin Chao , Yang Yuan-hao , Cheng Feng , Zhao Shan-shan
{"title":"Field test study on uplift bearing characteristics of rock socketed piles in sandstone stratum","authors":"Yang Bai , Qin Chao , Yang Yuan-hao , Cheng Feng , Zhao Shan-shan","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on the field ultimate load test, the uplift bearing characteristics of reinforced cement concrete (RCC) bored piles in clay and sandstone strata were analyzed, and semi empirical methods for calculating the ultimate uplift capacity of rock socketed pile were proposed. This method was compared with the design codes of pile foundations in China and Europe, and its reliability was verified by engineering case analysis. The results show that the relationship curves between pile top displacement and uplift load are of steep deformation type. In the field test, the ultimate uplift capacity increases with the increase of rock socketed depth or pile diameter. The failure mode of uplift pile is the relative sliding failure of pile body and surrounding rock and soil. In this technical report, the relationship between ultimate side resistance <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>r</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> and unconfined compressive strength <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> of sandstone is proposed,<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>r</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>0.18</mn><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mi>c</mi><mrow><mn>0.5</mn></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span> (MPa). And the calculation method of ultimate uplift capacity of the pile in clay and sandstone strata is proposed. The calculated results are in good agreement with the test results, with an error of −11.4 % to 9.5 %, which is smaller than that of the design codes of pile foundations in China and Europe. This calculated method has a certain reference for the design of uplift piles in similar strata.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"65 3","pages":"Article 101598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080625000320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Based on the field ultimate load test, the uplift bearing characteristics of reinforced cement concrete (RCC) bored piles in clay and sandstone strata were analyzed, and semi empirical methods for calculating the ultimate uplift capacity of rock socketed pile were proposed. This method was compared with the design codes of pile foundations in China and Europe, and its reliability was verified by engineering case analysis. The results show that the relationship curves between pile top displacement and uplift load are of steep deformation type. In the field test, the ultimate uplift capacity increases with the increase of rock socketed depth or pile diameter. The failure mode of uplift pile is the relative sliding failure of pile body and surrounding rock and soil. In this technical report, the relationship between ultimate side resistance and unconfined compressive strength of sandstone is proposed, (MPa). And the calculation method of ultimate uplift capacity of the pile in clay and sandstone strata is proposed. The calculated results are in good agreement with the test results, with an error of −11.4 % to 9.5 %, which is smaller than that of the design codes of pile foundations in China and Europe. This calculated method has a certain reference for the design of uplift piles in similar strata.
期刊介绍:
Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020.
Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.