A proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) study on the effects of different momentum ratios and Reynolds number in a T-junction with an upstream elbow

Q1 Chemical Engineering International Journal of Thermofluids Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101170
Y.H. Wong, Y. Duan, L. Lampunio, M.D. Eaton, M.J. Bluck
{"title":"A proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) study on the effects of different momentum ratios and Reynolds number in a T-junction with an upstream elbow","authors":"Y.H. Wong,&nbsp;Y. Duan,&nbsp;L. Lampunio,&nbsp;M.D. Eaton,&nbsp;M.J. Bluck","doi":"10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>T-junctions are critical components within the primary circuit of pressurised water reactors (PWRs). They connect the pressuriser (PRZ), with the steam generator (SG), and the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). As such, it is crucial to have a mechanistic understanding of the turbulent fluid flow and thermal mixing within such T-junctions. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of flows within T-junctions usually involve understanding the effects of variations in momentum and Reynolds numbers on the turbulent flow structures and thermal mixing phenomena. In this paper, we utilise proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) methods to analyse the complex flow structures arising from various test cases for a PWR T-junction with an upstream elbow.</div><div>The first aim is to compare the flow structures resulting from different momentum ratios and/or Reynolds numbers of the inlet branch flow to identify the dominant factor. These parameters are adjusted by varying the branch pipe diameter and inlet branch velocity. The final aim is to compare flow structures obtained using POD and SPOD analysis. While both methods produce explicable patterns, they reveal vastly different structures that can be interpreted differently.</div><div>Momentum ratios have traditionally guided engineering design optimization. Our findings indicate that altering the Reynolds number of the inlet branch flow can help avoid turbulent flow structures that may compromise the structural integrity of nuclear components in NPPs. While POD is widely used for fluid flow analysis, SPOD offers a more detailed examination of turbulent fluid flow structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36341,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Thermofluids","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Thermofluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266620272500117X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T-junctions are critical components within the primary circuit of pressurised water reactors (PWRs). They connect the pressuriser (PRZ), with the steam generator (SG), and the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). As such, it is crucial to have a mechanistic understanding of the turbulent fluid flow and thermal mixing within such T-junctions. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of flows within T-junctions usually involve understanding the effects of variations in momentum and Reynolds numbers on the turbulent flow structures and thermal mixing phenomena. In this paper, we utilise proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) methods to analyse the complex flow structures arising from various test cases for a PWR T-junction with an upstream elbow.
The first aim is to compare the flow structures resulting from different momentum ratios and/or Reynolds numbers of the inlet branch flow to identify the dominant factor. These parameters are adjusted by varying the branch pipe diameter and inlet branch velocity. The final aim is to compare flow structures obtained using POD and SPOD analysis. While both methods produce explicable patterns, they reveal vastly different structures that can be interpreted differently.
Momentum ratios have traditionally guided engineering design optimization. Our findings indicate that altering the Reynolds number of the inlet branch flow can help avoid turbulent flow structures that may compromise the structural integrity of nuclear components in NPPs. While POD is widely used for fluid flow analysis, SPOD offers a more detailed examination of turbulent fluid flow structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用固有正交分解(POD)和谱固有正交分解(SPOD)研究了不同动量比和雷诺数对具有上游弯头的t型结的影响
t型接头是压水堆一次回路中的关键部件。它们连接了增压器(PRZ)、蒸汽发生器(SG)和反应堆压力容器(RPV)。因此,对这种t型结内的湍流流体流动和热混合有一个机制的理解是至关重要的。计算流体力学(CFD)对t型结内流动的研究通常涉及了解动量和雷诺数变化对湍流结构和热混合现象的影响。在本文中,我们利用固有正交分解(POD)和谱固有正交分解(SPOD)方法分析了由不同测试案例产生的具有上游弯头的压水堆t型结的复杂流动结构。第一个目的是比较不同动量比和/或进口分支流雷诺数导致的流动结构,以确定主导因素。这些参数可以通过改变支管直径和进口支管速度来调节。最后的目的是比较用POD和SPOD分析得到的流动结构。虽然这两种方法都产生了可解释的模式,但它们揭示了截然不同的结构,可以用不同的方式解释。动量比传统上指导着工程设计的优化。我们的研究结果表明,改变进口分支流动的雷诺数可以帮助避免可能损害核电厂核部件结构完整性的湍流结构。POD被广泛用于流体流动分析,而SPOD提供了更详细的湍流流体流动结构检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Thermofluids
International Journal of Thermofluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Data-driven prediction and multi-objective optimization of pemfc performance using an ANN–GA hybrid model A technical note on solar thermal applications of semi-transparent liquid films Computational study of tetra hybrid nanofluid in micropolar fluid on shrinking/stretching needle: A dual solution study Numerical investigation of flow distribution and energy extraction in multi-fractured doublet Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) Homotopy simulation of oscillatory powell–eyring nanofluid under rotating MHD Forces with Hall–ion slip and thermophoretic deposition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1