Comparison of radiation dose and image quality for abdominal CT exams using photon-counting and energy-integrating CT: A self-controlled study including optimized patient positioning

IF 2.8 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2025.102909
L. Sukupova
{"title":"Comparison of radiation dose and image quality for abdominal CT exams using photon-counting and energy-integrating CT: A self-controlled study including optimized patient positioning","authors":"L. Sukupova","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.102909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT represents a major advancement in CT imaging, offering improved image quality and reduced radiation dose compared to traditional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. This study compared image quality and radiation dose using a self-controlled approach, while evaluating the impact of patient positioning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed data from 200 patients who underwent abdominal CT scans on both EID (Somatom Definition Flash) and PCD (Naeotom Alpha) scanners. After applying inclusion criteria for proper positioning (within ±20 mm) and stable anatomical conditions, 119 patients were included. Radiation doses were assessed using CTDI<sub>vol</sub>, and image quality was evaluated via CT numbers, noise levels, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), SNR to dose (SNRD), and contrast-to-noise ratio to dose (CNRD).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study found a median radiation dose reduction of 37 % with PCD CT compared to EID CT (p &lt; 0.05). Image quality assessments revealed significant improvements with PCD CT, including reduced noise levels (up to 31 % in contrast-enhanced organs) and enhanced SNRD (33–51 % increase). CNRD improved by 60–76 %, indicating superior imaging performance of PCD CT. However, 36 % of patients on EID were positioned outside the ±20 mm range, which could adversely affect image quality and radiation dose, underscoring the need for more precise patient positioning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study confirms that PCD CT achieves substantial reductions in radiation dose while enhancing image quality. However, accurate patient positioning is crucial to fully optimize these benefits. Automated tools that ensure proper positioning may be necessary to consistently maintain image quality and reduce radiation exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>PCD CT offers improved patient safety and diagnostic imaging. Automated positioning tools are essential to optimize and consistently maintain image quality and minimize radiation exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 102909"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT represents a major advancement in CT imaging, offering improved image quality and reduced radiation dose compared to traditional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. This study compared image quality and radiation dose using a self-controlled approach, while evaluating the impact of patient positioning.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed data from 200 patients who underwent abdominal CT scans on both EID (Somatom Definition Flash) and PCD (Naeotom Alpha) scanners. After applying inclusion criteria for proper positioning (within ±20 mm) and stable anatomical conditions, 119 patients were included. Radiation doses were assessed using CTDIvol, and image quality was evaluated via CT numbers, noise levels, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), SNR to dose (SNRD), and contrast-to-noise ratio to dose (CNRD).

Results

The study found a median radiation dose reduction of 37 % with PCD CT compared to EID CT (p < 0.05). Image quality assessments revealed significant improvements with PCD CT, including reduced noise levels (up to 31 % in contrast-enhanced organs) and enhanced SNRD (33–51 % increase). CNRD improved by 60–76 %, indicating superior imaging performance of PCD CT. However, 36 % of patients on EID were positioned outside the ±20 mm range, which could adversely affect image quality and radiation dose, underscoring the need for more precise patient positioning.

Conclusion

This study confirms that PCD CT achieves substantial reductions in radiation dose while enhancing image quality. However, accurate patient positioning is crucial to fully optimize these benefits. Automated tools that ensure proper positioning may be necessary to consistently maintain image quality and reduce radiation exposure.

Implications for practice

PCD CT offers improved patient safety and diagnostic imaging. Automated positioning tools are essential to optimize and consistently maintain image quality and minimize radiation exposure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用光子计数和能量积分CT检查腹部CT的辐射剂量和图像质量的比较:一项包括优化患者体位的自我对照研究
光子计数检测器(PCD) CT代表了CT成像的重大进步,与传统的能量积分检测器(EID) CT相比,它提供了更高的图像质量和更低的辐射剂量。本研究采用自我控制的方法比较图像质量和辐射剂量,同时评估患者体位的影响。方法回顾性分析200例患者在EID (Somatom Definition Flash)和PCD (Naeotom Alpha)扫描仪上进行腹部CT扫描的数据。以体位合适(±20 mm以内)、解剖条件稳定为纳入标准,纳入119例患者。使用CTDIvol评估辐射剂量,通过CT数、噪声水平、信噪比(SNR)、信噪比与剂量(SNRD)和比噪比与剂量(CNRD)评估图像质量。研究发现,与EID CT相比,PCD CT的中位辐射剂量降低了37% (p <;0.05)。图像质量评估显示PCD CT有显著改善,包括噪音水平降低(对比增强器官高达31%)和SNRD增强(增加33 - 51%)。CNRD改善60 - 76%,显示PCD CT具有优越的成像性能。然而,36%的EID患者定位在±20 mm范围之外,这可能对图像质量和辐射剂量产生不利影响,强调需要更精确的患者定位。结论PCD CT在降低辐射剂量的同时,提高了图像质量。然而,准确的患者定位对于充分优化这些益处至关重要。确保正确定位的自动化工具对于始终保持图像质量和减少辐射暴露是必要的。epcd CT提高了患者的安全性和诊断成像。自动定位工具对于优化和始终如一地保持图像质量和最大限度地减少辐射暴露至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the green gap: aligning rwandan medical imaging education with national and global sustainability goals A systematic review on the acceptability, perception, preference, comfort, and burdens associated with radiological investigations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients. Diagnostic performance of phase-contrast computed tomography versus digital mammography: A pilot study Performance of a complete AI radiographic suite across 258,373 X-rays from 26 countries: A worldwide evaluation Exploring social accountability in radiography education: Student perspectives on current practices and understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1