Natalie J. Harvey , Michael Herzog , Helen F. Dacre , Helen N. Webster
{"title":"A comparison of volcanic ash source term characteristics estimated by source inversion and plume rise modelling methods: Raikoke 2019","authors":"Natalie J. Harvey , Michael Herzog , Helen F. Dacre , Helen N. Webster","doi":"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2025.108304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Predictions of volcanic ash location and concentration following an eruption rely heavily on estimates of source term characteristics including mass eruption rate, vertical distribution of ash and particle size distribution. These characteristics can be provided by several methods including (i) preset values based on historical data, (ii) near-source plume rise model simulations, (iii) a combination of satellite retrievals and long-range dispersion model simulations (known as source inversion). For the first time, this study presents a comparison of source term characteristics from these different methods. The study focuses on the 2019 Raikoke eruption and analysis of the volcanic ash cloud 150 km downwind from the volcano vent, representing an effective source term for the dispersion of ash in the distal volcanic cloud. Results indicate good agreement in the vertical distribution of ash between the plume rise and source inversion methods but large differences in estimates of the horizontal mass flux at this distance. The plume rise model demonstrates the rapid sedimentation and deposition of coarse (<span><math><mo>></mo><mn>100</mn><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></math></span> diameter) ash particles close to the volcano vent resulting in a particle size distribution comparable to the preset distribution used operationally by the London VAAC at this range. These results suggest that source inversion can provide a computationally cheaper alternative to the 3D plume rise method for estimating the vertical distribution of ash, and that the assumption of near-source fallout of coarse particles in the preset particle size distribution holds fairly well. Further investigations are recommended including particle aggregation effects to understand differences in estimates of the effective mass eruption rate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","volume":"462 ","pages":"Article 108304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037702732500040X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predictions of volcanic ash location and concentration following an eruption rely heavily on estimates of source term characteristics including mass eruption rate, vertical distribution of ash and particle size distribution. These characteristics can be provided by several methods including (i) preset values based on historical data, (ii) near-source plume rise model simulations, (iii) a combination of satellite retrievals and long-range dispersion model simulations (known as source inversion). For the first time, this study presents a comparison of source term characteristics from these different methods. The study focuses on the 2019 Raikoke eruption and analysis of the volcanic ash cloud 150 km downwind from the volcano vent, representing an effective source term for the dispersion of ash in the distal volcanic cloud. Results indicate good agreement in the vertical distribution of ash between the plume rise and source inversion methods but large differences in estimates of the horizontal mass flux at this distance. The plume rise model demonstrates the rapid sedimentation and deposition of coarse ( diameter) ash particles close to the volcano vent resulting in a particle size distribution comparable to the preset distribution used operationally by the London VAAC at this range. These results suggest that source inversion can provide a computationally cheaper alternative to the 3D plume rise method for estimating the vertical distribution of ash, and that the assumption of near-source fallout of coarse particles in the preset particle size distribution holds fairly well. Further investigations are recommended including particle aggregation effects to understand differences in estimates of the effective mass eruption rate.
期刊介绍:
An international research journal with focus on volcanic and geothermal processes and their impact on the environment and society.
Submission of papers covering the following aspects of volcanology and geothermal research are encouraged:
(1) Geological aspects of volcanic systems: volcano stratigraphy, structure and tectonic influence; eruptive history; evolution of volcanic landforms; eruption style and progress; dispersal patterns of lava and ash; analysis of real-time eruption observations.
(2) Geochemical and petrological aspects of volcanic rocks: magma genesis and evolution; crystallization; volatile compositions, solubility, and degassing; volcanic petrography and textural analysis.
(3) Hydrology, geochemistry and measurement of volcanic and hydrothermal fluids: volcanic gas emissions; fumaroles and springs; crater lakes; hydrothermal mineralization.
(4) Geophysical aspects of volcanic systems: physical properties of volcanic rocks and magmas; heat flow studies; volcano seismology, geodesy and remote sensing.
(5) Computational modeling and experimental simulation of magmatic and hydrothermal processes: eruption dynamics; magma transport and storage; plume dynamics and ash dispersal; lava flow dynamics; hydrothermal fluid flow; thermodynamics of aqueous fluids and melts.
(6) Volcano hazard and risk research: hazard zonation methodology, development of forecasting tools; assessment techniques for vulnerability and impact.