{"title":"Flexural behaviour and design of circular concrete-filled tube beams: Effective stress method","authors":"Abdullah Alghossoon , Duaa Omoush , Amit Varma","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current AISC Specification lacks clear guidance on the flexural design of circular concrete-filled tube (CCFT) beams, while updates to material strength restrictions and the P-M interaction design curve apply exclusively to rectangular shapes. In response, this paper builds on a series of the author’s prior research to focus on the unique characteristics of CCFT beams, covering a wide range of material strength and geometric properties. A mechanical-based model, coupled with 169 experimental test outcomes, is utilized to develop an effective plastic stress distribution model for predicting the flexural capacity of conventional and high-strength CCFT beams with high precision. The proposed model accounts for the interaction between steel and concrete, including concrete confinement, steel local buckling, and the bi-axial state of stresses on steel. The results demonstrate that steel local buckling in circular filled shapes is unlikely, while the author's expression, as established in a prior study, for concrete confinement under pure compression applies to beams. Statistical validation indicates that the proposed effective stress model achieves the highest predictive efficiency compared to current design codes, with a coefficient of variation (CoV) of 12.6 % and a coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup>) of 0.99. This study offers an easy-to-use design expression for structural engineers by eliminating the current need for section classifications and represents a crucial step for researchers investigating the axial-flexure interaction behavior of conventional and high-strength CCFT members.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 120104"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962500495X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current AISC Specification lacks clear guidance on the flexural design of circular concrete-filled tube (CCFT) beams, while updates to material strength restrictions and the P-M interaction design curve apply exclusively to rectangular shapes. In response, this paper builds on a series of the author’s prior research to focus on the unique characteristics of CCFT beams, covering a wide range of material strength and geometric properties. A mechanical-based model, coupled with 169 experimental test outcomes, is utilized to develop an effective plastic stress distribution model for predicting the flexural capacity of conventional and high-strength CCFT beams with high precision. The proposed model accounts for the interaction between steel and concrete, including concrete confinement, steel local buckling, and the bi-axial state of stresses on steel. The results demonstrate that steel local buckling in circular filled shapes is unlikely, while the author's expression, as established in a prior study, for concrete confinement under pure compression applies to beams. Statistical validation indicates that the proposed effective stress model achieves the highest predictive efficiency compared to current design codes, with a coefficient of variation (CoV) of 12.6 % and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.99. This study offers an easy-to-use design expression for structural engineers by eliminating the current need for section classifications and represents a crucial step for researchers investigating the axial-flexure interaction behavior of conventional and high-strength CCFT members.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.