Stepwise response-guided treatment protocol superior to thrombopoietin receptor agonist-based second-line therapy for severe persistent/chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a multicenter prospective study from China
Lingling Fu , Xi Lin , Zhenping Chen , Zhifa Wang , Yan Liu , Lijuan Wang , Yu Hu , Jingyao Ma , Nan Wang , Xiaoling Cheng , Jie Ma , Runhui Wu
{"title":"Stepwise response-guided treatment protocol superior to thrombopoietin receptor agonist-based second-line therapy for severe persistent/chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a multicenter prospective study from China","authors":"Lingling Fu , Xi Lin , Zhenping Chen , Zhifa Wang , Yan Liu , Lijuan Wang , Yu Hu , Jingyao Ma , Nan Wang , Xiaoling Cheng , Jie Ma , Runhui Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The first second-line international recommendation for children with severe persistent/chronic immune thrombocytopenia is thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA)-based treatment; however, <30% can achieve sustained response off-treatment (SRoT), leading to a heavy medical burden.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to confirm the efficacy of the stepwise response-guided treatment protocol compared with TPO-RA–based second-line therapy for children with severe P/CITP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The stepwise response-guided treatment protocol is an individualized stratified immune thrombocytopenia treatment starting with high-dose dexamethasone, then adding rituximab and TPO-RAs in sequential order according to treatment response. A prospective, multicenter clinical cohort study enrolled severe P/CITP children with a 1-year follow-up. We compared the treatment outcome response of platelet count, bleeding control, and treatment-related side effects and cost outcomes (escalation status, SRoT, and treatment costs) between the stepwise group and the TPO-RA–based second-line treatment group (TPO-RA group).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study enrolled 143 cases of severe P/CITP children with a 12-month follow-up period. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the stepwise and TPO-RA groups (<em>P</em> > .05). Response/remission rates and bleeding grades showed no differences (<em>P</em> > .05), but there were fewer side effects related to treatment in the stepwise group (9.0%; <em>P</em> < .00). A total of 74% in the stepwise group achieved SRoT while none in the TPO-RA group did. The cost of treatment was significantly lower in the stepwise group compared with the TPO-RA group over the 12-month follow-up period (USD 68.26/kg vs USD 384.76/kg, <em>P</em> < .00).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The stepwise response-guided treatment protocol effectively stratifies children with severe P/CITP based on treatment response, enabling individualized treatment strategies. This protocol achieves comparable efficacy and safety while reducing the treatment burden compared with TPO-RA–based second-line therapy, making it a preferable option for children with severe P/CITP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 102702"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037925000263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The first second-line international recommendation for children with severe persistent/chronic immune thrombocytopenia is thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA)-based treatment; however, <30% can achieve sustained response off-treatment (SRoT), leading to a heavy medical burden.
Objectives
This study aimed to confirm the efficacy of the stepwise response-guided treatment protocol compared with TPO-RA–based second-line therapy for children with severe P/CITP.
Methods
The stepwise response-guided treatment protocol is an individualized stratified immune thrombocytopenia treatment starting with high-dose dexamethasone, then adding rituximab and TPO-RAs in sequential order according to treatment response. A prospective, multicenter clinical cohort study enrolled severe P/CITP children with a 1-year follow-up. We compared the treatment outcome response of platelet count, bleeding control, and treatment-related side effects and cost outcomes (escalation status, SRoT, and treatment costs) between the stepwise group and the TPO-RA–based second-line treatment group (TPO-RA group).
Results
The study enrolled 143 cases of severe P/CITP children with a 12-month follow-up period. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the stepwise and TPO-RA groups (P > .05). Response/remission rates and bleeding grades showed no differences (P > .05), but there were fewer side effects related to treatment in the stepwise group (9.0%; P < .00). A total of 74% in the stepwise group achieved SRoT while none in the TPO-RA group did. The cost of treatment was significantly lower in the stepwise group compared with the TPO-RA group over the 12-month follow-up period (USD 68.26/kg vs USD 384.76/kg, P < .00).
Conclusion
The stepwise response-guided treatment protocol effectively stratifies children with severe P/CITP based on treatment response, enabling individualized treatment strategies. This protocol achieves comparable efficacy and safety while reducing the treatment burden compared with TPO-RA–based second-line therapy, making it a preferable option for children with severe P/CITP.