Alternative sources for high flow nasal oxygen in low-resource settings: Exploring the potential of auxiliary oxygen ports and wall flowmeters

IF 0.7 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101542
Johan J Swart , Claire Pfister , Hayli Geffen , Ross Hofmeyr
{"title":"Alternative sources for high flow nasal oxygen in low-resource settings: Exploring the potential of auxiliary oxygen ports and wall flowmeters","authors":"Johan J Swart ,&nbsp;Claire Pfister ,&nbsp;Hayli Geffen ,&nbsp;Ross Hofmeyr","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy delivers pure oxygen at rates over 40 L/min during preoxygenation and 60 L/min during apnoea, preventing hypoxia and extending safe apnoeic time. HFNO is beneficial in certain clinical scenarios. However, cost and limited availability of HFNO devices restrict routine use. Auxiliary oxygen outlets on anaesthesia workstations present a potential alternative HFNO source.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the maximum flow rates from auxiliary oxygen outlets on various anaesthesia workstations and wall flowmeters, to explore their viability as a source for HFNO.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After calibration in Switzerland, a CITREX H4 gas flow analyser was used to measure flow rates across multiple anaesthesia workstations and wall-mounted flowmeters at five hospitals affiliated with one academic anaesthesia department.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Only two of nine tested workstations could reliably support flows sufficient for high flow apnoeic oxygenation. The General Electric (GE) CS 650 workstation had the highest average flow rate (120 L/min) while the Dräger Fabius GS Premium had the lowest (13 L/min). Wall flowmeters had flow rates ranging from 108 to 28 L/min, with most supporting flow rates greater than 60L/min.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The auxiliary oxygen outlet on anaesthetic workstations and general oxygen flowmeters is underutilised. Sufficient flow rates to function as a source of HFNO are attainable with many types, but should be individually tested. In a resource-limited environment, this could provide a cost-effective alternative in providing apnoeic oxygenation for a time-limited period, although safety has not yet been established.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210844025000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy delivers pure oxygen at rates over 40 L/min during preoxygenation and 60 L/min during apnoea, preventing hypoxia and extending safe apnoeic time. HFNO is beneficial in certain clinical scenarios. However, cost and limited availability of HFNO devices restrict routine use. Auxiliary oxygen outlets on anaesthesia workstations present a potential alternative HFNO source.

Aim

This study aimed to assess the maximum flow rates from auxiliary oxygen outlets on various anaesthesia workstations and wall flowmeters, to explore their viability as a source for HFNO.

Methods

After calibration in Switzerland, a CITREX H4 gas flow analyser was used to measure flow rates across multiple anaesthesia workstations and wall-mounted flowmeters at five hospitals affiliated with one academic anaesthesia department.

Results

Only two of nine tested workstations could reliably support flows sufficient for high flow apnoeic oxygenation. The General Electric (GE) CS 650 workstation had the highest average flow rate (120 L/min) while the Dräger Fabius GS Premium had the lowest (13 L/min). Wall flowmeters had flow rates ranging from 108 to 28 L/min, with most supporting flow rates greater than 60L/min.

Conclusion

The auxiliary oxygen outlet on anaesthetic workstations and general oxygen flowmeters is underutilised. Sufficient flow rates to function as a source of HFNO are attainable with many types, but should be individually tested. In a resource-limited environment, this could provide a cost-effective alternative in providing apnoeic oxygenation for a time-limited period, although safety has not yet been established.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低资源环境下高流量鼻氧的替代来源:探索辅助氧口和壁流量计的潜力
高流量鼻氧(HFNO)治疗在预充氧期间以超过40 L/min的速率提供纯氧,在呼吸暂停期间以60 L/min的速率提供纯氧,防止缺氧并延长安全呼吸暂停时间。HFNO在某些临床情况下是有益的。然而,HFNO设备的成本和有限的可用性限制了常规使用。麻醉工作站的辅助供氧口是一种潜在的替代HFNO来源。目的本研究旨在评估不同麻醉工作站和壁式流量计辅助供氧口的最大流量,探讨其作为高流量一氧化氮来源的可行性。方法在瑞士校准后,使用CITREX H4气体流量分析仪测量一个学术麻醉科所属五家医院的多个麻醉工作站和壁挂式流量计的流量。结果9个测试工作站中只有2个能够可靠地支持足够的高流量呼吸性氧合。通用电气(GE) CS 650工作站的平均流速最高(120 L/min),而Dräger Fabius GS Premium最低(13 L/min)。壁式流量计的流量范围为108 ~ 28l /min,大多数配套流量大于60L/min。结论麻醉工作站及普通氧流量计辅助供氧口利用不足。许多类型都可以达到足够的流量作为HFNO的来源,但应单独测试。在资源有限的环境中,这可能是一种具有成本效益的替代方法,可以在有限的时间内提供呼吸暂停氧合,尽管安全性尚未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Airway leaders, resources, practice, and organization in Portugal: A national survey of anaesthesiologists in public and private practice Evaluation of simulated task performance of a novel human factors inspired airway management equipment bag compared to an industry standard bag Malignant central airway obstruction and combined anatomical-physiological difficult airway – A case report To compare the analgesic efficacy of anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block combined with adductor canal block versus adductor canal block alone in patients undergoing unilateral Total Knee Replacement (TKR): A randomised controlled trial Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1