A Scoping Review of Responsive Neurostimulation in Focal Cortical Dysplasia-Related Epilepsy

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110362
Vincent Chang , Puck C. Reeders , Elizabeth R. Blackwood , Elizabeth Palmi , Brian N. Lundstrom , Sandipan Pati , Pariya Salami , Vikram R. Rao , Shruti Agashe
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Responsive Neurostimulation in Focal Cortical Dysplasia-Related Epilepsy","authors":"Vincent Chang ,&nbsp;Puck C. Reeders ,&nbsp;Elizabeth R. Blackwood ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Palmi ,&nbsp;Brian N. Lundstrom ,&nbsp;Sandipan Pati ,&nbsp;Pariya Salami ,&nbsp;Vikram R. Rao ,&nbsp;Shruti Agashe","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) is a closed-loop neuromodulation therapy approved for treating drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) with 1 or 2 seizure foci, but its potential utility for treating complex seizure networks, such as in focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), remains uncertain. This review and commentary discuss the current practice of RNS use in focal cortical dysplasia-related drug-resistant epilepsy(FCD-DRE), and the potential of individualized approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our scoping review followed a search to identify relevant studies on epilepsy and RNS across MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, yielding 674, 1,255, and 579 results, respectively followed by abstract and full text review to include FCD-DRE. Data on history, imaging, intracranial EEG, RNS implantation and programming strategies were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>78 patients with FCD-DRE across 25 studies were included. The most common lead configuration was two depth electrodes in 53 % (19/36). The median seizure reduction was 85 % [IQR = 66, 96] with a median follow up of 17 months., including 6 patients (7.6 %) achieving seizure freedom for a median 15 months. In 17 patients with resections and RNS implantation, median seizure frequency reduction was 87 % (N = 15), not significantly different from the group with RNS only. 8 patients with cortical and thalamic leads had median seizure frequency reduction of 87 % [IQR = 51, 92]. RNS was effective when used in refractory status epilepticus associated with FCDs.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>RNS is a flexible therapy that effectively reduces seizures in FCD-DRE. Electrographic and imaging signatures can potentially be leveraged. Hybrid resection with RNS approaches and the role in refractory status epilepticus associated with FCD is highlighted. Future studies are necessary to optimize RNS therapy in FCD-DRE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 110362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025001015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) is a closed-loop neuromodulation therapy approved for treating drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) with 1 or 2 seizure foci, but its potential utility for treating complex seizure networks, such as in focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), remains uncertain. This review and commentary discuss the current practice of RNS use in focal cortical dysplasia-related drug-resistant epilepsy(FCD-DRE), and the potential of individualized approaches.

Methods

Our scoping review followed a search to identify relevant studies on epilepsy and RNS across MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, yielding 674, 1,255, and 579 results, respectively followed by abstract and full text review to include FCD-DRE. Data on history, imaging, intracranial EEG, RNS implantation and programming strategies were recorded.

Results

78 patients with FCD-DRE across 25 studies were included. The most common lead configuration was two depth electrodes in 53 % (19/36). The median seizure reduction was 85 % [IQR = 66, 96] with a median follow up of 17 months., including 6 patients (7.6 %) achieving seizure freedom for a median 15 months. In 17 patients with resections and RNS implantation, median seizure frequency reduction was 87 % (N = 15), not significantly different from the group with RNS only. 8 patients with cortical and thalamic leads had median seizure frequency reduction of 87 % [IQR = 51, 92]. RNS was effective when used in refractory status epilepticus associated with FCDs.

Significance

RNS is a flexible therapy that effectively reduces seizures in FCD-DRE. Electrographic and imaging signatures can potentially be leveraged. Hybrid resection with RNS approaches and the role in refractory status epilepticus associated with FCD is highlighted. Future studies are necessary to optimize RNS therapy in FCD-DRE.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病灶皮质发育不良相关癫痫的反应性神经刺激范围综述
目的反应性神经刺激(RNS)是一种被批准用于治疗具有1或2个发作灶的耐药癫痫(DRE)的闭环神经调节疗法,但其治疗复杂发作网络(如局灶性皮质发育不良(FCD))的潜在用途仍不确定。这篇综述和评论讨论了RNS在局灶性皮质发育不良相关的耐药癫痫(FCD-DRE)中的应用现状,以及个性化治疗方法的潜力。方法通过MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science检索癫痫和RNS相关研究,分别获得674、1255和579条结果,然后进行摘要和全文综述,纳入FCD-DRE。记录病史、影像学、颅内脑电图、RNS植入及编程策略等资料。结果25项研究共纳入78例FCD-DRE患者。最常见的引线配置是两个深度电极,占53%(19/36)。中位癫痫发作减少率为85% [IQR = 66,96],中位随访时间为17个月。,其中6例患者(7.6%)实现了中位15个月的癫痫发作自由。在17例切除并植入RNS的患者中,癫痫发作频率中位数降低87% (N = 15),与仅植入RNS组无显著差异。8例皮质导联和丘脑导联患者癫痫发作频率中位数降低87% [IQR = 51,92]。RNS用于与fcd相关的难治性癫痫持续状态有效。erns是一种灵活的治疗方法,可有效减少FCD-DRE的癫痫发作。可以潜在地利用电图和成像签名。混合切除与RNS入路和难治性癫痫持续状态相关的FCD的作用突出。未来的研究需要优化FCD-DRE的RNS治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
Between seizures and schooling: qualitative insights into the experiences of children with epilepsy The influences of guilt and shame on anger in patients with concurrent psychogenic Non-Epileptic seizures and PTSD: The mediating role of frustration intolerance Regional and environmental differences in public attitudes toward epilepsy in Japan: A Post-hoc analysis of the SAPE-J nationwide survey Mind the Gap! What do people with epilepsy want to know? Quality of life measure for children with Epilepsy: A psychometric evaluation of the Italian version
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1