Farm-based therapy: An innovative treatment approach for children, adolescents and young adults

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2025.101967
Megan Moran , Chelsea Brown , Antonietta Alvarez Hernandez , Ingrid R. Hsu , Sarah Douglas , Louisa G. Sylvia
{"title":"Farm-based therapy: An innovative treatment approach for children, adolescents and young adults","authors":"Megan Moran ,&nbsp;Chelsea Brown ,&nbsp;Antonietta Alvarez Hernandez ,&nbsp;Ingrid R. Hsu ,&nbsp;Sarah Douglas ,&nbsp;Louisa G. Sylvia","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2025.101967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To describe the rationale and components of Farm-based Therapy (FBT) as well as examine its preliminary efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>FBT consists of five empirically supported components, or hands-on experience, sustainability, the life cycle, community, and mindfulness, that were developed in collaboration with clients, their caregivers, and clinicians. We explored the preliminary efficacy of FBT for improving anxiety and mood in new clients, and their parents, using the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We found that participants (N = 45) reported that their overall depression and anxiety (i.e., total RCADS score) improved after three months of FBT as well as the following RCADS subscales: social phobia, general anxiety, and obsessive and compulsive disorder, but not on separation anxiety, panic disorder, and low mood subscales. Parents reported that their children, or clients of FBT, improved on overall depression and anxiety (i.e., total RCADS score) as well as all subscales of the RCADS with the exception of separation anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our preliminary findings suggest that FBT may be an effective treatment for depression and anxiety and especially for social phobia, general anxiety, and obsessive and compulsive disorder. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings in larger samples, with longer follow-up and compared to other active treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101967"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388125000325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the rationale and components of Farm-based Therapy (FBT) as well as examine its preliminary efficacy.

Methods

FBT consists of five empirically supported components, or hands-on experience, sustainability, the life cycle, community, and mindfulness, that were developed in collaboration with clients, their caregivers, and clinicians. We explored the preliminary efficacy of FBT for improving anxiety and mood in new clients, and their parents, using the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS).

Results

We found that participants (N = 45) reported that their overall depression and anxiety (i.e., total RCADS score) improved after three months of FBT as well as the following RCADS subscales: social phobia, general anxiety, and obsessive and compulsive disorder, but not on separation anxiety, panic disorder, and low mood subscales. Parents reported that their children, or clients of FBT, improved on overall depression and anxiety (i.e., total RCADS score) as well as all subscales of the RCADS with the exception of separation anxiety.

Conclusion

Our preliminary findings suggest that FBT may be an effective treatment for depression and anxiety and especially for social phobia, general anxiety, and obsessive and compulsive disorder. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings in larger samples, with longer follow-up and compared to other active treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农场治疗:一种针对儿童、青少年和年轻人的创新治疗方法
目的介绍农场疗法(FBT)的基本原理和组成部分,并检查其初步疗效。方法sfbt由五个经验支持的组成部分组成,即实践经验、可持续性、生命周期、社区和正念,这些都是与客户、他们的护理人员和临床医生合作开发的。我们使用修订儿童焦虑和抑郁量表(RCADS)探讨了FBT在改善新来访者及其父母的焦虑和情绪方面的初步功效。结果我们发现,参与者(N = 45)报告说,他们的总体抑郁和焦虑(即RCADS总分)在FBT三个月后有所改善,以及以下RCADS分量表:社交恐惧症、一般焦虑和强迫症,但在分离焦虑、恐慌障碍和情绪低落分量表上没有改善。家长报告说,他们的孩子或FBT的客户在总体抑郁和焦虑(即RCADS总分)以及RCADS的所有亚量表上都有所改善,但分离焦虑除外。结论FBT可能是治疗抑郁和焦虑的有效方法,尤其对社交恐惧症、一般性焦虑和强迫症有较好的疗效。未来的研究需要在更大的样本中复制这些发现,随访时间更长,并与其他积极治疗相比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
期刊最新文献
Chinese patent medicine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1