The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography–derived parameters as prognostic factors in patients undergoing resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109271
Francesco Lancellotti MD , Agastya Patel MD , Savvas Tsaramanidis MD , Elbert Edy MBChB , Thomas Satyadas MD , Rafik Filobbos MD , Saurabh Jamdar MD , Sharon Barker NP , Ajith Kumar Siriwardena FRCS , Nicola de Liguori-Carino MD
{"title":"The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography–derived parameters as prognostic factors in patients undergoing resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma","authors":"Francesco Lancellotti MD ,&nbsp;Agastya Patel MD ,&nbsp;Savvas Tsaramanidis MD ,&nbsp;Elbert Edy MBChB ,&nbsp;Thomas Satyadas MD ,&nbsp;Rafik Filobbos MD ,&nbsp;Saurabh Jamdar MD ,&nbsp;Sharon Barker NP ,&nbsp;Ajith Kumar Siriwardena FRCS ,&nbsp;Nicola de Liguori-Carino MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this study is to investigate the role of maximum standardized uptake and tumor-to-liver ratio derived from preoperative <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent pancreatic resection from January 2015 to December 2022 were reviewed. Patients were grouped based on disease-free survival of 1 year, disease-free survival of 6 months, overall survival of 1 year, and resectability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 133 patients were included in the study. The median maximum standardized uptake was significantly greater in patients with shorter survival than in those with longer survival (disease-free survival &lt;1 year vs &gt;1 year: 7.1 [4.3–9.1] vs 4.9 [3.3–6.5], <em>P</em> &lt; .001; disease-free survival &lt;6 months vs &gt;6 months: 8 [4.5–9.7] vs 5.2 [3.4–6.8], <em>P</em> = .001; overall survival &lt;1 year vs &gt;1 year: 6.9 [4.4–8.8] vs 5 [3.4–6.9], <em>P</em> = .01). Median maximum standardized uptake was significantly greater in patients with intraoperative findings of unresectable disease than in those who underwent surgical resection (7.4 [5.5–9.5] vs 5.5 [3.8–7.8], <em>P</em> = .02). These findings were consistent for tumor-to-liver ratio for all groupings. The area under the curve based on receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.7 for both maximum standardized uptake and tumor-to-liver ratio for predicting disease-free survival, overall survival, and resectability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography maximum standardized uptake and tumor-to-liver ratio are indicators of resectability, early recurrence, and poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. A maximum standardized uptake value between 5 and 7 is a potential red flag, and further investigations should be considered before proceeding to a pancreatic resection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 109271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025001230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of maximum standardized uptake and tumor-to-liver ratio derived from preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Patients who underwent pancreatic resection from January 2015 to December 2022 were reviewed. Patients were grouped based on disease-free survival of 1 year, disease-free survival of 6 months, overall survival of 1 year, and resectability.

Results

A total of 133 patients were included in the study. The median maximum standardized uptake was significantly greater in patients with shorter survival than in those with longer survival (disease-free survival <1 year vs >1 year: 7.1 [4.3–9.1] vs 4.9 [3.3–6.5], P < .001; disease-free survival <6 months vs >6 months: 8 [4.5–9.7] vs 5.2 [3.4–6.8], P = .001; overall survival <1 year vs >1 year: 6.9 [4.4–8.8] vs 5 [3.4–6.9], P = .01). Median maximum standardized uptake was significantly greater in patients with intraoperative findings of unresectable disease than in those who underwent surgical resection (7.4 [5.5–9.5] vs 5.5 [3.8–7.8], P = .02). These findings were consistent for tumor-to-liver ratio for all groupings. The area under the curve based on receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.7 for both maximum standardized uptake and tumor-to-liver ratio for predicting disease-free survival, overall survival, and resectability.

Conclusion

Preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography maximum standardized uptake and tumor-to-liver ratio are indicators of resectability, early recurrence, and poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. A maximum standardized uptake value between 5 and 7 is a potential red flag, and further investigations should be considered before proceeding to a pancreatic resection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描衍生参数作为胰腺导管腺癌切除术患者预后因素的作用
本研究的目的是探讨最大标准化摄取和术前18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描在胰腺导管腺癌患者中的作用。方法回顾2015年1月至2022年12月行胰腺切除术的患者。患者根据1年无病生存期、6个月无病生存期、1年总生存期和可切除性进行分组。结果共纳入133例患者。生存期较短的患者中位最大标准化摄取显著高于生存期较长的患者(无病生存期1年vs无病生存期1年:7.1 [4.3-9.1]vs 4.9 [3.3-6.5], P <;措施;无病生存<;6个月vs >;6个月:8 [4.5-9.7]vs 5.2 [3.4-6.8], P = .001;总生存期(1年vs 1年):6.9 [4.4-8.8]vs 5 [3.4-6.9], P = 0.01)。术中发现不可切除疾病的患者中位最大标准化摄取显著高于手术切除患者(7.4 [5.5 - 9.5]vs 5.5 [3.8-7.8], P = 0.02)。这些发现与所有组的肿瘤与肝脏比例一致。基于受试者工作特征分析的曲线下面积为0.7,用于最大标准化摄取和预测无病生存、总生存和可切除性的肿瘤-肝比。结论术前18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描最大标准化摄取和瘤肝比是胰腺导管腺癌患者可切除、早期复发和预后不良的指标。最大标准化摄取值在5到7之间是一个潜在的危险信号,在进行胰腺切除术之前应该考虑进一步的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a nomogram for early prediction of splenic infarction after minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study Withdrawal of life support following interfacility transfer in older adults with traumatic brain injury Metabolic dysfunction–Associated fatty liver disease impairs intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography quality: Development and validation of a predictive model Collaborative model between breast surgery and genetic counseling reduces wait times and increases pretesting genetic counseling volume Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus open Lichtenstein primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1