On cutting coal dependency for establishing a cleaner energy mix: A proposal for energy transition strategy in South Africa

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101694
Sinan Erdogan , Ugur Korkut Pata , Andrew Adewale Alola , Chukwuemeka Echebiri
{"title":"On cutting coal dependency for establishing a cleaner energy mix: A proposal for energy transition strategy in South Africa","authors":"Sinan Erdogan ,&nbsp;Ugur Korkut Pata ,&nbsp;Andrew Adewale Alola ,&nbsp;Chukwuemeka Echebiri","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although coal has powered economic activities for decades and significantly contributed to increasing economic welfare at the global level, its place in the modern economic system remained controversial because of its environmental impacts. Thus, cutting coal utilization and dependency on this energy source posits a great environmental benefit. With is motivation, the primary motivation of this study is to investigate the role of possible cleaner energy alternatives in cutting coal dependence in South Africa, which is prevalently utilizing coal in energy. To this end, the study employs Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) as a baseline estimator and Canonical Regression (CCR) as a robustness check from 1984 to 2022. The obtained outcomes denote that (i) an inverted U-shaped nexus exists between economic growth and coal utilization in some models. (ii) Renewable and hydro energy use has a negative and statistically significant impact on coal use, while nuclear energy and natural gas have no statistically significant impact. (iii) Population density spurs coal utilization. (iv) Robustness checks imply that empirical outcomes are substantially robust. In this regard, South Africa could reduce the demand for coal with renewable and hydro energy sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101694"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although coal has powered economic activities for decades and significantly contributed to increasing economic welfare at the global level, its place in the modern economic system remained controversial because of its environmental impacts. Thus, cutting coal utilization and dependency on this energy source posits a great environmental benefit. With is motivation, the primary motivation of this study is to investigate the role of possible cleaner energy alternatives in cutting coal dependence in South Africa, which is prevalently utilizing coal in energy. To this end, the study employs Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) as a baseline estimator and Canonical Regression (CCR) as a robustness check from 1984 to 2022. The obtained outcomes denote that (i) an inverted U-shaped nexus exists between economic growth and coal utilization in some models. (ii) Renewable and hydro energy use has a negative and statistically significant impact on coal use, while nuclear energy and natural gas have no statistically significant impact. (iii) Population density spurs coal utilization. (iv) Robustness checks imply that empirical outcomes are substantially robust. In this regard, South Africa could reduce the demand for coal with renewable and hydro energy sources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
期刊最新文献
Impact of environmental factors on photovoltaic system performance degradation Research on the resilience of petroleum industry chain and supply chain network from the perspective of China Two-step price mechanism using Newton-Raphson method and peer-to-peer mediation for local electricity markets How growth, urbanization, and energy consumption affect CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia (1970–2020)? An ARDL and NARDL approach to investigate the eco-environmental challenge Enhancing the enviro-economic viability of biogas-solar hybrid systems: Strategies for sustainable energy development in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1