The Community Attitudes Towards Mental Illness (CAMI) Scale 40 Years Later: An Investigation Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Free-Response Data

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of community psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1002/jcop.70005
Nathan R. Huff, David H. Arnold, Linda M. Isbell
{"title":"The Community Attitudes Towards Mental Illness (CAMI) Scale 40 Years Later: An Investigation Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Free-Response Data","authors":"Nathan R. Huff,&nbsp;David H. Arnold,&nbsp;Linda M. Isbell","doi":"10.1002/jcop.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The community attitudes towards mental illness scale (CAMI) is widely used to measure authoritarianism, benevolence, social restrictiveness, and community mental health attitudes held by general populations and medical professionals. This study compares the fit of published alternative factor structures of the CAMI to a general population English-speaking sample and examines what mental illnesses individuals think about when responding. Using data from 749 US MTurk participants, confirmatory factor analysis supported a modified version of Morris' (2012) structure — fear/exclusion, social control, and goodwill — <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>(183) = 1094.44, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>RMSEA</i> = 0.08, <i>CFI</i> = 0.90, <i>SRMR</i> = 0.06. Most participants (73.6%) considered specific mental illnesses, with bipolar disorder, depression, and schizophrenia most common. Some found challenges defining mental illness. Comparing structures of a widely cited tool and identifying what respondents think about while completing the scale assists the many researchers using the CAMI. This clarifies our understanding of community stigma and improves our capacity to reduce it.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community psychology","volume":"53 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcop.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The community attitudes towards mental illness scale (CAMI) is widely used to measure authoritarianism, benevolence, social restrictiveness, and community mental health attitudes held by general populations and medical professionals. This study compares the fit of published alternative factor structures of the CAMI to a general population English-speaking sample and examines what mental illnesses individuals think about when responding. Using data from 749 US MTurk participants, confirmatory factor analysis supported a modified version of Morris' (2012) structure — fear/exclusion, social control, and goodwill — χ2(183) = 1094.44, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.08, CFI = 0.90, SRMR = 0.06. Most participants (73.6%) considered specific mental illnesses, with bipolar disorder, depression, and schizophrenia most common. Some found challenges defining mental illness. Comparing structures of a widely cited tool and identifying what respondents think about while completing the scale assists the many researchers using the CAMI. This clarifies our understanding of community stigma and improves our capacity to reduce it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
40年后社区对精神疾病的态度(CAMI)量表:使用验证性因子分析和自由反应数据的调查
社区精神疾病态度量表(CAMI)被广泛用于衡量一般人群和医疗专业人员对权威主义、仁慈、社会限制和社区精神健康的态度。这项研究比较了CAMI中已发表的替代因素结构与普通英语人群样本的契合度,并检查了精神疾病个体在回应时的想法。使用来自749名美国MTurk参与者的数据,验证性因素分析支持Morris(2012)结构的修改版本-恐惧/排斥,社会控制和善意- χ2(183) = 1094.44, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.08, CFI = 0.90, SRMR = 0.06。大多数参与者(73.6%)认为是特定的精神疾病,双相情感障碍、抑郁症和精神分裂症最常见。一些人发现很难定义精神疾病。比较一个被广泛引用的工具的结构,并确定受访者在完成量表时的想法,有助于许多研究人员使用CAMI。这澄清了我们对社区耻辱的理解,并提高了我们减少它的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
195
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, evaluation, assessment and intervention, and review articles that deal with human behavior in community settings. Articles of interest include descriptions and evaluations of service programs and projects, studies of youth, parenting, and family development, methodology and design for work in the community, the interaction of groups in the larger community, and criminals and corrections.
期刊最新文献
Using Intervention Mapping to Develop, Implement, and Evaluate a Community Engaged Crime Reduction Intervention A Psychosocial Analysis in a Context of Seismic and Volcanic Emergency: Well-Being in the Campi Flegrei Area. “Get to Know My Community”: Community-Driven Guidance for Future Transgender and Nonbinary Focused Research Radical Healing in Three Marginalised South African Communities: Practices and Places of Healing Growing Stronger Together: Evaluating a Culturally Integrated Strengthening Families Program With Native American Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1