Identifying Risk Factors for Central Venous Access Device Complications in Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES European Journal of Cancer Care Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1155/ecc/9956694
Jenna L. Nunn, Mari D. Takashima, Erin M. Wray-Jones, Trisha A. Soosay Raj, Diane M. Hanna, Amanda J. Ullman
{"title":"Identifying Risk Factors for Central Venous Access Device Complications in Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review","authors":"Jenna L. Nunn,&nbsp;Mari D. Takashima,&nbsp;Erin M. Wray-Jones,&nbsp;Trisha A. Soosay Raj,&nbsp;Diane M. Hanna,&nbsp;Amanda J. Ullman","doi":"10.1155/ecc/9956694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> To systematically review the risk factors for central venous access device (CVAD)–associated complications in pediatric patients with cancer.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A scoping review with systematic search criteria was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases from 2012 to 2022. Cohort studies and the control arm of randomized controlled trials, which reported CVAD-associated complications in pediatric patients aged 0–18 years, were included.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> 381 studies were identified in initial screening, with 25 studies included in the review. Device-related factors were commonly reported as risk factors for central line–associated blood stream infection, CVAD-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), and device failure. Tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC), multilumen devices, and larger diameter lumens were risk factors for CLABSI. TCVCs were a risk factor for device failure. PICCs were a risk factor for CVAD-associated VTE. Provider and patient-related risk factors were rarely reported. There is significant inconsistency in the quality of reporting of vascular access data.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> External devices are associated with an increased risk of CVAD-associated complications. There is a limited good quality prospective evidence on risk factors for CVAD-associated complications in this cohort. Further research is needed to understand drivers of these complications, inform preventative strategies, and guide device-selection decisions. Improved research quality through adherence to benchmarking reporting standards for vascular access data is also needed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/9956694","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/9956694","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To systematically review the risk factors for central venous access device (CVAD)–associated complications in pediatric patients with cancer.

Methods: A scoping review with systematic search criteria was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases from 2012 to 2022. Cohort studies and the control arm of randomized controlled trials, which reported CVAD-associated complications in pediatric patients aged 0–18 years, were included.

Results: 381 studies were identified in initial screening, with 25 studies included in the review. Device-related factors were commonly reported as risk factors for central line–associated blood stream infection, CVAD-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), and device failure. Tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC), multilumen devices, and larger diameter lumens were risk factors for CLABSI. TCVCs were a risk factor for device failure. PICCs were a risk factor for CVAD-associated VTE. Provider and patient-related risk factors were rarely reported. There is significant inconsistency in the quality of reporting of vascular access data.

Conclusion: External devices are associated with an increased risk of CVAD-associated complications. There is a limited good quality prospective evidence on risk factors for CVAD-associated complications in this cohort. Further research is needed to understand drivers of these complications, inform preventative strategies, and guide device-selection decisions. Improved research quality through adherence to benchmarking reporting standards for vascular access data is also needed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
期刊最新文献
Identifying Risk Factors for Central Venous Access Device Complications in Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review Differences in Psychological Distress of Cancer and Hemodialysis Caregivers: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in Lebanon A Physical Exercise Intervention, Delivered Through In-Person or Home-Based Programs, in Patients Living With Cancer and Bone Metastases: A Single-Arm, Feasibility Study Factors Associated With Upgrades From Biopsy Gleason Grades 1–3 to Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Grades 4–5 in Prostate Cancer Patients ‘Death Doulas’ are not yet an Issue in German Palliative Care—A National Survey of Palliative Care Providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1