Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Anastomoses of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Multicentric Experience.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancers Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.3390/cancers17050910
Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Chiara Coluccio, Edoardo Forti, Alessandro Fugazza, Cecilia Binda, Giuseppe Vanella, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Andrea Lisotti, Marcello Fabio Maida, Giovanni Aragona, Aurelio Mauro, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, Ilaria Tarantino, On Behalf Of The I-Eus Group
{"title":"Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Anastomoses of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Multicentric Experience.","authors":"Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Chiara Coluccio, Edoardo Forti, Alessandro Fugazza, Cecilia Binda, Giuseppe Vanella, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Andrea Lisotti, Marcello Fabio Maida, Giovanni Aragona, Aurelio Mauro, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, Ilaria Tarantino, On Behalf Of The I-Eus Group","doi":"10.3390/cancers17050910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This multicenter retrospective study included patients undergoing EUS-guided GI anastomoses from 2016 to 2023. Indications for EUS-guided anastomosis were GOO, ALS or patients with altered anatomy needing endoscopic interventions. The primary outcome was technical success, while secondary outcomes included clinical success, safety, lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) patency, and the need for reinterventions. A total of 216 patients (mean age 64.5 [±13.94] years; 49.1% males) were included. In total, 149 cases (69%) were GOO, 44 (20.4%) cases were bilioenteric anastomotic strictures or lithiasis in altered anatomy, 14 cases (6.5%) were ALS, and 9 patients (4.2%) were for ERCP in altered anatomy after EUS-GG. Overall, EUS-GE was performed in 181 patients (83.8%), EUS-JJ in 44 cases (20.4%), and EUS-GG in 10 (4.6%). Technical success was 94.91%, and clinical success was 93.66%. The adverse event (AE) rate was 11.1%. The reintervention rate was 7.69%. The median follow-up was 85 days. In conclusions, EUS-guided GI anastomoses are technically feasible and safe in both malignant and benign diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11899671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17050910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This multicenter retrospective study included patients undergoing EUS-guided GI anastomoses from 2016 to 2023. Indications for EUS-guided anastomosis were GOO, ALS or patients with altered anatomy needing endoscopic interventions. The primary outcome was technical success, while secondary outcomes included clinical success, safety, lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) patency, and the need for reinterventions. A total of 216 patients (mean age 64.5 [±13.94] years; 49.1% males) were included. In total, 149 cases (69%) were GOO, 44 (20.4%) cases were bilioenteric anastomotic strictures or lithiasis in altered anatomy, 14 cases (6.5%) were ALS, and 9 patients (4.2%) were for ERCP in altered anatomy after EUS-GG. Overall, EUS-GE was performed in 181 patients (83.8%), EUS-JJ in 44 cases (20.4%), and EUS-GG in 10 (4.6%). Technical success was 94.91%, and clinical success was 93.66%. The adverse event (AE) rate was 11.1%. The reintervention rate was 7.69%. The median follow-up was 85 days. In conclusions, EUS-guided GI anastomoses are technically feasible and safe in both malignant and benign diseases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声内镜下胃肠道吻合术:多中心经验。
这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2016年至2023年接受eus引导下胃肠道吻合术的患者。eus引导下吻合的适应症为粘稠、肌萎缩侧索硬化症或解剖结构改变需要内镜介入的患者。主要结果是技术成功,次要结果包括临床成功、安全性、腔旁金属支架(LAMS)通畅以及是否需要再干预。共216例患者,平均年龄64.5[±13.94]岁;49.1%男性)。EUS-GG术后,粘胶瘤149例(69%),胆肠吻合口狭窄或改变解剖结石44例(20.4%),肌萎缩侧索硬化症14例(6.5%),改变解剖ERCP 9例(4.2%)。总体而言,EUS-GE有181例(83.8%),EUS-JJ有44例(20.4%),EUS-GG有10例(4.6%)。技术成功率94.91%,临床成功率93.66%。不良事件(AE)发生率为11.1%。再干预率为7.69%。中位随访时间为85天。综上所述,eus引导下的胃肠道吻合术在技术上是可行和安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Chen et al. LncRNA ERVH48-1 Contributes to the Drug Resistance of Prostate Cancer and Proliferation through Sponging of miR-4784 to the Activation of the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. Cancers 2023, 15, 1902. Supramaximal Resection in Glioblastoma: Expanding Surgical Boundaries in the Era of Precision Neuro-Oncology-A Systematic Review. Immunohistochemical Expression of IDO and PD-L1 in Distinct Compartments of Breast Cancer Tissue: Correlation with Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes. Comparison of Comprehensive Serum miRNA Sequencing and Apolipoprotein A2 Isoforms for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Breast Cancer Histopathology: Toward Improved Diagnosis and Prognosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1