Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias in the chloroplast genome of five Caragana.

IF 4.8 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES BMC Plant Biology Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1186/s12870-025-06351-x
XinJuan Li, LiE Liu, QianDan Ren, Tian Zhang, Na Hu, Jing Sun, Wu Zhou
{"title":"Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias in the chloroplast genome of five Caragana.","authors":"XinJuan Li, LiE Liu, QianDan Ren, Tian Zhang, Na Hu, Jing Sun, Wu Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s12870-025-06351-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The genus Caragana, known for its adaptability and high forage value, is commonly planted to rehabilitate barren land and prevent desertification. Several Caragana species are also used for medicinal purposes. Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias and their primary influencing factors in chloroplast genomes aims to provide insights into molecular research and germplasm innovation for Caragana plants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GC content of the five Caragana species ranged from 36.00% to 37.10%, showing a preference for codons ending in A/U, although the codon bias was weak. The screening identified nine to twelve optimal codons, but their frequency of use was low. Correlation analysis, neutrality plots, ENC plots and PR2 plots of the parameters identified two potential groups among the five species: Caragana arborescens and Caragana jubata, and Caragana turkestanica, Caragana opulens and Caragana tibetica. These groups showed a high level of intragroup similarity in the parameter analyses. In the RSCU cluster tree analysis, Caragana turkestanica and Caragana arborescens grouped together, while Caragana tibetica, Caragana jubata and Caragana opulens formed a separate clade in the CDS sequence and complete sequence phylogenetic tree analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The codon usage bias in the chloroplast genomes of the five Caragana species showed high similarity, suggesting that natural selection has a greater influence on codon bias than mutation. Furthermore, the identified optimal codons provide valuable insights for germplasm improvement of Caragana plants.</p>","PeriodicalId":9198,"journal":{"name":"BMC Plant Biology","volume":"25 1","pages":"322"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06351-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The genus Caragana, known for its adaptability and high forage value, is commonly planted to rehabilitate barren land and prevent desertification. Several Caragana species are also used for medicinal purposes. Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias and their primary influencing factors in chloroplast genomes aims to provide insights into molecular research and germplasm innovation for Caragana plants.

Results: The GC content of the five Caragana species ranged from 36.00% to 37.10%, showing a preference for codons ending in A/U, although the codon bias was weak. The screening identified nine to twelve optimal codons, but their frequency of use was low. Correlation analysis, neutrality plots, ENC plots and PR2 plots of the parameters identified two potential groups among the five species: Caragana arborescens and Caragana jubata, and Caragana turkestanica, Caragana opulens and Caragana tibetica. These groups showed a high level of intragroup similarity in the parameter analyses. In the RSCU cluster tree analysis, Caragana turkestanica and Caragana arborescens grouped together, while Caragana tibetica, Caragana jubata and Caragana opulens formed a separate clade in the CDS sequence and complete sequence phylogenetic tree analysis.

Conclusions: The codon usage bias in the chloroplast genomes of the five Caragana species showed high similarity, suggesting that natural selection has a greater influence on codon bias than mutation. Furthermore, the identified optimal codons provide valuable insights for germplasm improvement of Caragana plants.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5种锦鸡儿叶绿体基因组同义密码子使用偏向性分析。
背景:锦鸡儿属植物适应性强,具有较高的饲用价值,是修复荒地和防治荒漠化的常用植物。一些锦鸡儿品种也被用于药用目的。分析柠条属植物叶绿体基因组中同义密码子使用偏向性及其主要影响因素,旨在为柠条属植物的分子研究和种质创新提供参考。结果:5种锦鸡儿的GC含量在36.00% ~ 37.10%之间,表现出对以a /U结尾的密码子的偏好,但密码子偏性较弱。筛选确定了9到12个最佳密码子,但它们的使用频率很低。通过相关分析、中性图、ENC图和PR2图,确定了5个物种中2个潜在类群:柠条和朱巴柠条,以及土耳其柠条、populens柠条和西藏柠条。这些组在参数分析中显示出高水平的组内相似性。在RSCU聚类树分析中,土耳其锦鸡儿和杉木锦鸡儿聚在一起,而在CDS序列和全序列系统发育树分析中,西藏锦鸡儿、朱巴锦鸡儿和大锦鸡儿形成一个单独的分支。结论:5种锦鸡儿叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏性具有较高的相似性,表明自然选择对密码子偏性的影响大于突变。此外,所鉴定的最佳密码子为锦鸡儿属植物的种质改良提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Plant Biology
BMC Plant Biology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Plant Biology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of plant biology, including molecular, cellular, tissue, organ and whole organism research.
期刊最新文献
H3K36 methyltransferase SDG102 enhances salt tolerance by altering the methylation level of genes in maize (Zea mays L.). Integrated effects of Curcumin application methods and Trichoderma afroharzianum on Fusarium wilt management and biochemical responses in hot pepper (Capsicum annuum). Physiological and molecular mechanisms of Medicago ruthenica in response to different saline-alkali stresses. Mitogenome characterization and organellar genome evolution in achlorophyllous orchid Chamaegastrodia shikokiana Makino & F.Maek. (Orchidaceae). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of RBR-type ubiquitin ligase family genes reveal the role of ZmIBR10 in maize disease resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1